×

Emergence of polarization in a sigmoidal bounded-confidence model of opinion dynamics. (English) Zbl 1542.91314

Summary: We study a nonlinear bounded-confidence model (BCM) of continuous-time opinion dynamics on networks with both persuadable individuals and zealots. The model is parameterized by a nonnegative scalar \(\gamma\), which controls the steepness of a smooth influence function. This influence function encodes the relative weights that individuals place on the opinions of other individuals. When \(\gamma =0\), this influence function recovers Taylor’s averaging model; when \(\gamma \rightarrow \infty\), the influence function converges to that of a modified Hegselmann-Krause (HK) BCM. Unlike the classical HK model, however, our sigmoidal bounded-confidence model (SBCM) is smooth for any finite \(\gamma\). We show that the set of steady states of our SBCM is qualitatively similar to that of the Taylor model when \(\gamma\) is small and that the set of steady states approaches a subset of the set of steady states of a modified HK model as \(\gamma \rightarrow \infty\). For certain special graph topologies, we give analytical descriptions of important features of the space of steady states. A notable result is a closed-form relationship between graph topology and the stability of polarized states in a simple special case that models echo chambers in social networks. Because the influence function of our BCM is smooth, we are able to study it with linear stability analysis, which is difficult to employ with the usual discontinuous influence functions in BCMs.

MSC:

91D30 Social networks; opinion dynamics
05C82 Small world graphs, complex networks (graph-theoretic aspects)
34D20 Stability of solutions to ordinary differential equations

Software:

R; ggplot2; Julia

References:

[1] Abelson, R. P., Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy, in Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, Fredericksen, N. and Gullicksen, H., eds., Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York City, NY, USA, 1964.
[2] Abelson, R. P., Mathematical models in social psychology, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 3, Berkowitz, L., ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1967, pp. 1-54.
[3] Arenas, A., Díaz-Guilera, A., Kurths, J., Moreno, Y., and Zhou, C., Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep., 469 (2008), pp. 93-153.
[4] Bak-Coleman, J. B., Alfano, M., Barfuss, W., Bergstrom, C. T., Centeno, M. A., Couzin, I. D., Donges, J. F., Galesic, M., Gersick, A. S., Jacquet, J., Kao, A. B., Moran, R. E., Romanczuk, P., Rubenstein, D. I., Tombak, K. J., Van Bavel, J. J., and Weber, E. U., Stewardship of global collective behavior, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118 (2021), e2025764118.
[5] Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., and Starnini, M.,Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124 (2020), 048301.
[6] Benjamini, I. and Lovász, L., Harmonic and analytic functions on graphs, J. Geom., 76 (2003), pp. 3-15. · Zbl 1028.31005
[7] Bernardo, C., Altafini, C., Proskurnikov, A., and Vasca, F.,Bounded confidence opinion dynamics: A survey, Automatica, 159 (2024), 111302. · Zbl 1537.91203
[8] Bernardo, M., Budd, C., Champneys, A. R., and Kowalczyk, P., Piecewise-Smooth Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. · Zbl 1146.37003
[9] Bertozzi, A. L., Carrillo, J. A., and Laurent, T., Blow-up in multidimensional aggregation equations with mildly singular interaction kernels, Nonlinearity, 22 (2009), pp. 683-710. · Zbl 1194.35053
[10] Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., and Shah, V. B., Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Rev., 59 (2017), pp. 65-98. · Zbl 1356.68030
[11] Bizyaeva, A., Franci, A., and Leonard, N. E., Nonlinear opinion dynamics with tunable sensitivity, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 68 (2023), pp. 1415-1430. · Zbl 07743760
[12] Blondel, V. D., Hendrickx, J. M., and Tsitsiklis, J. N., On Krause’s multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 54 (2009), pp. 2586-2597. · Zbl 1367.93426
[13] Bonetto, R. and Kojakhmetov, H. J., Nonlinear Laplacian Dynamics: Symmetries, Perturbations, and Consensus, preprint, arXiv:2206.04442, 2022.
[14] Brooks, H. Z. and Porter, M. A., A model for the influence of media on the ideology of content in online social networks, Phys. Rev. Res., 2 (2020), 023041.
[15] Bullo, F., Lectures on Network Systems, Edition 1.6, Kindle Direct Publishing, Santa Barbara, CA, 2022, https://fbullo.github.io/lns/.
[16] Ceragioli, F. and Frasca, P., Continuous and discontinuous opinion dynamics with bounded confidence, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 13 (2012), pp. 1239-1251. · Zbl 1239.91129
[17] Ceragioli, F., Frasca, P., Piccoli, B., and Rossi, F., Generalized solutions to opinion dynamics models with discontinuities, in Crowd Dynamics3, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2021, pp. 11-47. · Zbl 1504.91210
[18] Chen, G., Su, W., Mei, W., and Bullo, F., Convergence properties of the heterogeneous Deffuant-Weisbuch model, Automatica, 114 (2020), 108825. · Zbl 1441.91058
[19] Couzin, I. D., Ioannou, C. C., Demirel, G., Gross, T., Torney, C. J., Hartnett, A., Conradt, L., Levin, S. A., and Leonard, N. E., Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups, Science, 334 (2011), pp. 1578-1580.
[20] De, A., Valera, I., Ganguly, N., Bhattacharya, S., and Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Learning and forecasting opinion dynamics in social networks, in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, , NeurIPS ’16, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 397-405.
[21] De Pasquale, G. and Valcher, M. E., Multi-dimensional extensions of the Hegselmann-Krause model, in Proceedings of the 61st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, , Cancun, Mexico, 2022, pp. 3525-3530.
[22] Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G., and Faure, T., How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 5(4) (2002), 1.
[23] Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., and Weisbuch, G., Mixing beliefs among interacting agents, Adv. Complex Syst., 3 (2000), pp. 87-98.
[24] Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., and Weisbuch, G., Modelling Group Opinion Shift to Extreme: The Smooth Bounded Confidence Model, preprint, arXiv:cond-mat/0410199, 2004.
[25] DeGroot, M. H., Reaching a consensus, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 69 (1974), pp. 118-121. · Zbl 0282.92011
[26] Devriendt, K. and Lambiotte, R., Nonlinear network dynamics with consensus-dissensus bifurcation, J. Nonlinear Sci., 31 (2021), pp. 1-34. · Zbl 1467.37046
[27] Dittmer, J. C., Consensus formation under bounded confidence, Nonlinear Anal., 47 (2001), pp. 4615-4622. · Zbl 1042.91567
[28] Franci, A., Golubitsky, M., Bizyaeva, A., and Leonard, N. E., A Model-Independent Theory of Consensus and DIssensus Decision Making, preprint, arXiv:1909.05765, 2019.
[29] Franci, A., Golubitsky, M., Stewart, I., Bizyaeva, A., and Leonard, N. E., Breaking Indecision in Multi-Agent, Multi-Option Dynamics, preprint, arXiv:2206.14893, 2022.
[30] French, J. R. P., A formal theory of social power, Psychol. Rev., 63 (1956), pp. 181-194.
[31] Friedkin, N. E. and Johnsen, E. C., Social influence and opinions, J. Math. Sociol., 15 (1990), pp. 193-206. · Zbl 0712.92025
[32] Fu, G., Zhang, W., and Li, Z., Opinion dynamics of modified Hegselmann-Krause model in a group-based population with heterogeneous bounded confidence, Phys. A, 419 (2015), pp. 558-565. · Zbl 1400.91463
[33] Galam, S. and Jacobs, F., The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics, Phys. A, 381 (2007), pp. 366-376.
[34] Gandica, Y. and Deffuant, G., Bounded Confidence Model on Growing Populations, preprint, arXiv:2305.18858, 2023.
[35] Golubitsky, M. and Stewart, I., Dynamics and Bifurcation in Networks: Theory and Applications of Coupled Differential Equations, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, , Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2023. · Zbl 1527.37001
[36] Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U., Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 5(3) (2002), 2.
[37] Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U., Opinion dynamics under the influence of radical groups, charismatic leaders, and other constant signals: A simple unifying model, Netw. Heterog. Media, 10 (2015), pp. 477-509. · Zbl 1332.90049
[38] Hegselmann, R. and Krause, U., Consensus and fragmentation of opinions with a focus on bounded confidence, Amer. Math. Monthly, 126 (2019), pp. 700-716. · Zbl 1425.91374
[39] Homs-Dones, M., Devriendt, K., and Lambiotte, R., Nonlinear consensus on networks: Equilibria, effective resistance, and trees of motifs, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 20 (2021), pp. 1544-1570. · Zbl 1478.05142
[40] Jia, P., MirTabatabaei, A., Friedkin, N. E., and Bullo, F., Opinion dynamics and the evolution of social power in influence networks, SIAM Rev., 57 (2015), pp. 367-397. · Zbl 1339.91098
[41] Juul, J. S. and Porter, M. A., Hipsters on networks: How a minority group of individuals can lead to an antiestablishment majority, Phys. Rev. E, 99 (2019), 022313.
[42] Karlsson, A., Some remarks concerning harmonic functions on homogeneous graphs, in Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, DMTCS Proceedings AC, Discrete Random Walks (DRW ’03), , 2003, pp. 137-144. · Zbl 1073.60529
[43] Klamser, P. P., Wiedermann, M., Donges, J. F., and Donner, R. V., Zealotry effects on opinion dynamics in the adaptive voter model, Phys. Rev. E, 96 (2017), 052315.
[44] Landemore, H. and Page, S. E., Deliberation and disagreement: Problem solving, prediction, and positive dissensus, Polit. Philos. Econ., 14 (2015), pp. 229-254.
[45] Leonard, N. E., Lipsitz, K., Bizyaeva, A., Franci, A., and Lelkes, Y., The nonlinear feedback dynamics of asymmetric political polarization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118 (2021), e2102149118.
[46] Levin, S. A., Milner, H. V., and Perrings, C., The dynamics of political polarization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118 (2021), e2116950118.
[47] Liang, H., Su, H., Wang, Y., Peng, C., Fei, M., and Wang, X., Continuous-time opinion dynamics with stochastic multiplicative noises, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Briefs, 66 (2018), pp. 988-992.
[48] Martins, A. C. R. and Galam, S., Building up of individual inflexibility in opinion dynamics, Phys. Rev. E, 87 (2013), 042807.
[49] Meng, X. F., Van Gorder, R. A., and Porter, M. A., Opinion formation and distribution in a bounded-confidence model on various networks, Phys. Rev. E, 97 (2018), 022312.
[50] Mobilia, M., Petersen, A., and Redner, S., On the role of zealotry in the voter model, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 2007 (2007), P08029. · Zbl 1456.91047
[51] Munkres, J. R., Analysis on Manifolds, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997.
[52] Nabet, B., Leonard, N. E., Couzin, I. D., and Levin, S. A., Dynamics of decision making in animal group motion, J. Nonlinear Sci., 19 (2009), pp. 399-435. · Zbl 1169.93302
[53] Neuhäuser, L., Mellor, A., and Lambiotte, R., Multibody interactions and nonlinear consensus dynamics on networked systems, Phys. Rev. E, 101 (2020), 032310.
[54] Noorazar, H., Vixie, K. R., Talebanpour, A., and Hu, Y., From classical to modern opinion dynamics, Internat. J. Modern Phys. C, 31 (2020), 2050101.
[55] Noschese, S., Pasquini, L., and Reichel, L., Tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices: Properties and novel applications, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 20 (2013), pp. 302-326. · Zbl 1289.65082
[56] Okawa, M. and Iwata, T., Predicting opinion dynamics via sociologically-informed neural networks, in Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’22, , Association for Computing Machinery, New York City, NY, USA, 2022, pp. 1306-1316.
[57] Olfati Saber, R. and Murray, R. M., Flocking with obstacle avoidance: Cooperation with limited communication in mobile networks, in 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37475), vol. 2, 2003, pp. 2022-2028.
[58] Parsegov, S. E., Proskurnikov, A. V., Tempo, R., and Friedkin, N. E., Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 62 (2016), pp. 2270-2285. · Zbl 1366.91125
[59] Porter, M. A. and Gleeson, J. P., Dynamical Systems on Networks: A Tutorial, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2016. · Zbl 1369.34001
[60] Porter, M. A., Onnela, J.-P., and Mucha, P. J., Communities in networks, Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 56 (2009), pp. 1082-1097, 1164-1166. · Zbl 1188.05142
[61] Proskurnikov, A. V. and Tempo, R., A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I, Annu. Rev. Control, 43 (2017), pp. 65-79.
[62] R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2022.
[63] Ren, W. and Beard, R. W., Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 50 (2005), pp. 655-661. · Zbl 1365.93302
[64] Rodrigues, F. A., Peron, T. K. DM., Ji, P., and Kurths, J., The Kuramoto model in complex networks, Phys. Rep., 610 (2016), pp. 1-98. · Zbl 1357.34089
[65] Srivastava, V., Moehlis, J., and Bullo, F., On bifurcations in nonlinear consensus networks, J. Nonlinear Sci., 21 (2011), pp. 875-895. · Zbl 1242.34089
[66] Taylor, M., Towards a mathematical theory of influence and attitude change, Hum. Relat., 21 (1968), pp. 121-139.
[67] Verma, G., Swami, A., and Chan, K., The impact of competing zealots on opinion dynamics, Phys. A, 395 (2014), pp. 310-331. · Zbl 1402.91606
[68] Von Luxburg, U., A tutorial on spectral clustering, Stat. Comput., 17 (2007), pp. 395-416.
[69] Waller, I. and Anderson, A., Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms, Nature, 600 (2021), pp. 264-268.
[70] Wickham, H., ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2016, https://ggplot2-book.org.
[71] Xing, Y. and Johansson, K. H., Transient behavior of gossip opinion dynamics with community structure, Automatica, 164 (2024), 111627. · Zbl 1537.91226
[72] Yang, Y., Dimarogonas, D. V., and Hu, X., Opinion consensus of modified Hegselmann-Krause models, Automatica, 50 (2014), pp. 622-627. · Zbl 1364.93037
[73] Zachary, W. W., An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups, J. Anthropol. Res., 33 (1977), pp. 452-473.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.