×

A kidney segmentation framework for dynamic constrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. (English) Zbl 1342.92106

Summary: In the United States, more than 12000 renal transplantations are performed annually; but the transplanted kidneys face a number of surgical and medical complications that cause a decrease in their functionality. In an effort to understand the reasons for this functionality decrease, considerable attention has recently been focused on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) due to its superior functional and anatomical information. The biggest challenge in the analysis of DCE-MRI is the segmentation of kidneys from abdomen images because of the high noise and partial volume effects introduced during the rapid and repeated scanning process.
In this paper, a general framework is introduced for the segmentation of kidneys from DCE-MR images of the abdomen. The proposed segmentation algorithm consists of three main steps. In the first step, an average kidney shape is constructed from a dataset of previously segmented kidneys, and an average signed distance map density is obtained describing the shape of the kidneys. In the second step, the gray level density is calculated for a given new kidney image using a modified expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. In the third step, a deformable model is evolved based on the two density functions obtained from the previous two steps: the first one describes the prior shape of the kidney, and the second one describes the distribution of the gray level inside and outside the kidney region. The new deformable model is able to handle intricate shapes without getting stuck in edge points and gives very promising results that are comparable to radiologists’ segmentation.

MSC:

92C50 Medical applications (general)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Boykov, Y., Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI)
[2] El-Baz, A., Proceedings of International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI)
[3] Farag, A.A., Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
[4] Farag, A.A., IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15 (4) pp 952– (2006) · doi:10.1109/TIP.2005.863949
[5] Farag, A.A., IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI)
[6] Gerig, G., IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11 (2) pp 221– (1992) · doi:10.1109/42.141646
[7] Giele, E.L.W., Computer methods for semi-automatic MR renogram determination. PhD thesis (2002)
[8] El-Baz, A., Proceedings of International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI)
[9] Rigg, K.M., Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 36 pp B51– (1995) · doi:10.1093/jac/36.suppl_B.51
[10] Schlesinger, M.I., Ten Lectures on Statistical and Structural Pattern Recognition (2002) · Zbl 1087.62505 · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3217-8
[11] Sun, Y., Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
[12] Tsai, A., IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22 (2) pp 137– (2003) · doi:10.1109/TMI.2002.808355
[13] Witkin, A., International Journal of Computer Vision 1 pp 321– (1987) · doi:10.1007/BF00123162
[14] Yang, D., Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 46 pp 1152– (2001) · doi:10.1002/mrm.1312
[15] Yuksel, S.E., Image processing methods for the detection of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. MS thesis (2005)
[16] Yuksel, S.E., Proceedings of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.