×

Compact support FDK kernel reconstruction model base on approximate inverse. (English) Zbl 1264.65222

Summary: A novel CT reconstruction model is proposed, and the reconstruction is completed by this kernel-based method. The reconstruction kernel can be obtained by combining the approximate inverse method with the FDK algorithm. The computation of the kernel is moderate, and the reconstruction results can be improved by introducing the compact support version of the kernel. The efficiency and the accuracy are shown in the numerical experiments.

MSC:

65T60 Numerical methods for wavelets
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] A. K. Louis and P. Maass, “A mollifier method for linear operator equations of the first kind,” Inverse Problems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 427-440, 1990. · Zbl 0713.65040 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/6/3/011
[2] A. K. Louis, “Approximate inverse for linear and some nonlinear problems,” Inverse Problems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 175-190, 1996. · Zbl 0851.65036 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/12/2/005
[3] A. K. Louis, “Development of algorithms in computerized tomography,” in The Radon Transform, Inverse Problems, and Tomography, G. Olafsson and E. T. Quinto, Eds., vol. 63 of Proc. Sympos. Appl. Math., pp. 25-42, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, USA, 2006. · Zbl 1100.65118
[4] P. Grangeat, “Mathematical framework of cone beam 3D reconstruction via the first derivative of the Radon transform,” in Mathematical Methods in Tomography, vol. 1497 of Lecture Notes in Math., pp. 66-97, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991. · Zbl 0764.65079
[5] A. K. Louis, T. Weber, and D. Theis, “Computing reconstruction kernels for circular 3-D cone beam tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 880-886, 2008. · doi:10.1109/TMI.2008.922188
[6] I. A. Feldkamp, L. C. Davis, and J. W. Kress, “Practical cone-beam algorithm,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 612-619, 1984.
[7] K. Zeng, Z. Chen, L. Zhang, and G. Wang, “An error-reduction-based algorithm for cone-beam computed tomography,” Medical Physics, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 3206-3212, 2004. · doi:10.1118/1.1809792
[8] D. Soimu, I. Buliev, and N. Pallikarakis, “Studies on circular isocentric cone-beam trajectories for 3D image reconstructions using FDK algorithm,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 210-220, 2008. · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.12.005
[9] Z. Chen and R. Ning, “Volume fusion for two-circular-orbit cone-beam tomography,” Applied Optics, vol. 45, no. 23, pp. 5960-5966, 2006. · doi:10.1364/AO.45.005960
[10] J. Hsieh, Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Scincep, Beijing, China, 2006.
[11] H. Turbell and P.-E. Danielsson, “Helical cone-beam tomography,” International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 91-100, 2000. · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(2000)11:1<91::AID-IMA10>3.0.CO;2-F
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.