×

Optimized Gauss-Legendre-Hermite 2-point (O-GLH-2P) method for nonlinear time-history analysis of structures. (English) Zbl 07830933

Meccanica 59, No. 3, 305-332 (2024); correction ibid. 59, No. 4, 681 (2024).
Summary: An efficient time-integration method is developed for nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structural systems. The main novelty of the new method is to couple Gauss-Legendre integrator with particular forms of Hermite interpolator to solve the vibration equation under earthquake excitation. Accordingly, the simplest Gauss-Legendre quadrature is adopted from numerical analysis while Hermite interpolators are separately constructed for the given task of evaluating the internal points, so-called stages. Then, using swarm intelligence, a greatly constructive modification is made in the body of the Gauss-Legendre integrator to strengthen it for dealing with high-frequency NDA problems. So, an additional part is included in the integrator and it is tuned by calibration factor (CF) which is introduced in this work. The modern evolutionary optimizer is used to obtain the optimal calibration factor (OCF) formula. The resulted method is called optimized Gauss-Legendre-Hermite 2-point (O-GLH-2P) method because it is basically founded on the 2-point Gauss-Legendre formula which is optimized in an evolutionary procedure. O-GLH-2P provides a completely general implicit NDA algorithm for linear and nonlinear analyses of structural systems undergoing earthquake excitation. The advantages of the proposed algorithm against conventional ones are as follows: 1) It works more precisely than the conventional methods such as Newmark-\(\beta\) and Wilson-\(\theta\) methods, 2) Very simple relations and basic formulas are used in the main body of the O-GLH-2P algorithm, 3) It runs appropriately fast; however, it still cannot work as fast as the Newmark-\(\beta\) method, 4) It robustly analyzes high-frequency systems with \(T_n \leq 0.12\)s. These systems can be difficultly analyzed by the others unless very fine mesh is employed, and 5) O-GLH-2P conducts a more precise analysis for conservative and near-conservative systems which have small damping ratio, i.e., \(\zeta \leq 0.01\). In brief, the extreme simplicity and high precision of the proposed method make it stand higher than its counterparts. Numerical studies clearly verify the superiority of O-GLH-2P against the others.

MSC:

74S20 Finite difference methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74L10 Soil and rock mechanics
74L05 Geophysical solid mechanics
86A15 Seismology (including tsunami modeling), earthquakes
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Akbari, MA; Zare, M.; Azizipanah-Abarghooee, R.; Mirjalili, S.; Deriche, M., The cheetah optimizer: a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for large-scale optimization problems, Sci Rep, 12, 1, 10953, 2022 · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14338-z
[2] Babaei, M.; Jalilkhani, M.; Mollaei, S., A numerical method for estimating the dynamic response of structures, J Civ Environ Eng, 2021 · doi:10.22034/jcee.2021.41770.1963
[3] Babaei, M.; Jalilkhani, M.; Ghasemi, SH; Mollaei, S., New methods for dynamic analysis of structural systems under earthquake loads, J Rehabil Civ Eng, 10, 3, 81-99, 2022
[4] Babaei, M.; Farzi, J., Derivation of weighting rules for developing a class of A-stable numerical integration scheme: αI-(2+ 3) P method, J Differ Equ Appl, 29, 4, 489-518, 2023 · Zbl 1515.65188 · doi:10.1080/10236198.2023.2219785
[5] Babaei, M.; Alidoost, MR; Hanafi, MR, A novel numerical method for nonlinear time history analysis of MDOF structures: Newton-Cotes-Hermite-4Point, J Struct Construct Eng, 2023 · doi:10.22065/jsce.2023.400538.3134
[6] Hanafi, MR; Babaei, M.; Narjabadifam, P., New Formulation for dynamic analysis of nonlinear time-history of vibrations of structures under earthquake loading, J Civ Environ Eng, 2023 · doi:10.22034/ceej.2023.54564.2209
[7] Bathe, K-J, Finite element procedures, 1996, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
[8] Bathe, K-J; Baig, MMI, On a composite implicit time-integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics, Comput Struct, 83, 31-32, 2513-2524, 2005 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.08.001
[9] Bathe, KJ; Noh, G., Insight into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Comput Struct, 98, 1-6, 2012 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.01.009
[10] Brusa, L.; Nigro, L., A one-step method for direct integration of structural dynamic equations, Int J Numer Methoss Eng, 15, 5, 685-699, 1980 · Zbl 0426.65034 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620150506
[11] Chen, CC; Robinson, AR, Improved time-history analysis for structural dynamics. I: treatment of rapid variation of excitation and material nonlinearity, J Eng Mech, 119, 12, 2496-2513, 1993 · doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:12(2496)
[12] Chopra, AK, Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 2012, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
[13] Chung, J.; Hulbert, G., A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-α method, J Appl Mech, 60, 371-375, 1993 · Zbl 0775.73337 · doi:10.1115/1.2900803
[14] Chung, J.; Hulbert, GM, A family of single-step Houbolt time integration algorithms for structural dynamics, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 118, 1-2, 1-11, 1994 · Zbl 0849.73079
[15] Craig, RR Jr; Kurdila, AJ, Fundamentals of structural dynamics, 2006, Wiley · Zbl 1118.70001
[16] Clough, RW; Penzien, J., Dynamics of Structures, 1995, Berkeley: Computers & Structure, Berkeley
[17] Craig, RR; Kurdila, AJ, Fundamentals of structural dynamics, 2006, New York: Wiley, New York · Zbl 1118.70001
[18] Ebeling RM, Green RA, French SE (1997) Accuracy of response of single-degree-of freedom systems to ground motion, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Technical report ITL-97-7, Washington, DC
[19] Gatti, PL, Applied structural and mechanical vibrations: theory and methods, 2014, Boca Raton: CRC Press, Boca Raton · doi:10.1201/b16697
[20] Géradin, M.; Rixen, DJ, Mechanical vibrations: theory and application to structural dynamics, 2014, New Yorks: Wiley, New Yorks
[21] Hilber, HM; Hughes, TJ; Taylor, RL, Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthq Eng Struct Dynam, 5, 3, 283-292, 1977 · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290050306
[22] Hoff, C.; Pahl, PJ, Development of an implicit method with numerical dissipation from a generalized single-step algorithm for structural dynamics, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 67, 3, 367-385, 1988 · Zbl 0619.73002 · doi:10.1016/0045-7825(88)90053-9
[23] Houbolt, JC, A recurrence matrix solution for the dynamic response of elastic aircraft, J Aeronaut Sci, 17, 9, 540-550, 1950 · doi:10.2514/8.1722
[24] Humar, J., Dynamics of structures, 2012, Boca Raton: CRC Press, Boca Raton · Zbl 1246.74001 · doi:10.1201/b11772
[25] Karabalis DL, Beskos DE (1997) Numerical methods in earthquake engineering. In: Computer analysis and design in earthquake resistant structures: a handbook, pp 1-102
[26] Katona, MC; Zienkiewicz, OC, A unified set of single step algorithms part 3: the beta-m method, a generalization of the Newmark scheme, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 21, 7, 1345-1359, 1985 · Zbl 0584.65044 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620210713
[27] Katsikadelis JT (2013) A new direct time integration scheme for the nonlinear equations of motion in structural dynamics. In: 10th HSTAM international congress on mechanics, May 2013, pp 25-27
[28] Katsikadelis, JT, A new direct time integration method for the equations of motion in structural dynamics, ZAMM-J Appl Math Mech, 94, 9, 757-774, 2014 · Zbl 1298.74251 · doi:10.1002/zamm.201200245
[29] Katsikadelis, JT, A new method for numerical integration of higher-order ordinary differential equations without losing the periodic responses, Front Built Environ, 7, 2021 · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.621037
[30] Katsikadelis JT (2012) Dynamic analysis of structures. In: Theory and application, 2nd ed. Symmetria Publications, Athens (in Greek)
[31] Kim, W.; Reddy, JN, An improved time integration algorithm: a collocation time finite element approach, Int J Struct Stab Dyn, 17, 2, 1750024, 2017 · Zbl 1535.74643 · doi:10.1142/S0219455417500249
[32] Kurt, N.; Çevik, M., ‘Polynomial solution of the single degree of freedom system by Taylor matrix method’, Mech Res Commun, 35, 530-536, 2008 · Zbl 1258.70033 · doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.05.001
[33] Li, PS; Wu, BS, ‘An iteration approach to nonlinear oscillations of conservative single-degree-of-freedom systems’, Acta Mech, 170, 69-75, 2004 · Zbl 1063.70018 · doi:10.1007/s00707-004-0112-3
[34] Malathy, RB; Bhat, G.; Dewangan, UK, An improved iterative technique for inelastic time history analysis of single degree of freedom (SDOF) elasto-plastic system, J Build Pathol Rehabil, 7, 1, 1-14, 2022
[35] Meirovitch, L., Elements of vibration analysis, 1986, Singapore: Mc-Graw Hill Inc., Singapore
[36] Newmark, NM, ‘A method of computation for structural dynamics’, ASCE J Eng Mech Div, 85, 67-94, 1959 · doi:10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098
[37] Noh, G.; Bathe, KJ, Further insights into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Comput Struct, 202, 15-24, 2018 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.02.007
[38] Noh, G.; Bathe, KJ, The Bathe time integration method with controllable spectral radius: the ρ∞-Bathe method, Comput Struct, 212, 299-310, 2019 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.11.001
[39] Paz, M.; Leigh, W., Structural dynamics: theory and computation, 2004, New York: Springer, New York · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0481-8
[40] Rao, SS, Mechanical vibrations in SI units, 2017, Pearson: Pearson Higher Ed, Pearson
[41] Shao, HP, The studying on the direct time integration algorithms for structural dynamics response [master’s thesis], 1987, Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
[42] Shao HP, Cai CW (1988) The direct integration three-parameters optimal schemes for structural dynamics. In: Proceeding of the international conference: machine dynamics and engineering applications. Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, pp C16-C20
[43] Shao, HP; Cai, CW, A three parameters algorithm for numerical integration of structural dynamic equations, Chin J Appl Mech, 5, 4, 76-81, 1988
[44] Soroushian, A.; Wriggers, P.; Farjoodi, J., On practical integration of semi-discretized nonlinear equations of motion. Part 1: reasons for probable instability and improper convergence, J Sound Vibr, 284, 3-5, 705-731, 2005 · Zbl 1237.70014 · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2004.07.008
[45] Tedesco, J.; McDougal, WG; Ross, CA, Structural dynamics, 2000, London, UK: Pearson Education, London, UK
[46] Thomas, RM; Addison, CA; Gladwell, I., A family of Houbolt methods for dynamic vibration problems, Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, 7, 3, 321-336, 1983 · Zbl 0523.65056 · doi:10.1002/nag.1610070305
[47] Veletsos AS, Newmark NM, Chelapati CV (1965) Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions. In: Proceedings of the world conference on earthquake engineering, pp 663-682
[48] Wood, WL, On the Zienkiewicz four-time-level scheme for the numerical integration of vibration problems, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 11, 10, 1519-1528, 1977 · Zbl 0362.65063 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620111004
[49] Wood, WL; Bossak, M.; Zienkiewicz, OC, An alpha modification of Newmark’ s method, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 15, 10, 1562-1566, 1980 · Zbl 0441.73106 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620151011
[50] Wood, WL, A further look at Newmark, Houbolt, etc, time-stepping formulae, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 20, 6, 1009-1017, 1984 · Zbl 0535.73067 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620200604
[51] Wood, WL, A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 2: theory, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 20, 12, 2303-2309, 1984 · Zbl 0557.65042 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620201210
[52] Wen, WB; Wei, K.; Lei, HS; Duan, SY; Fang, DN, A novel sub-step composite implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Comput Struct, 182, 176-186, 2017 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.11.018
[53] Wu, JS, Analytical and numerical methods for vibration analyses, 2013, Singapore: Wiley, Singapore · Zbl 1292.74002
[54] Yu, K.; Zhao, J., A time integral formulation and algorithm for structural dynamics with nonlinear stiffness, Acta Mechanica Sinica, 22, 479-485, 2006 · Zbl 1202.74196 · doi:10.1007/s10409-006-0025-6
[55] Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, D., Accuracy of a composite implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 109, 3, 368-406, 2017 · Zbl 07874361 · doi:10.1002/nme.5291
[56] Zhang, J., A-stable two-step time integration methods with controllable numerical dissipation for structural dynamics, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 121, 1, 54-92, 2020 · Zbl 07841253 · doi:10.1002/nme.6188
[57] Zienkiewicz, OC, A new look at the Newmark, Houbolt and other time stepping formulas:a weighted residual approach, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 5, 4, 413-418, 1977 · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290050407
[58] Zienkiewicz, OC; Wood, WL; Taylor, RL, An alternative single-step algorithm for dynamic problems, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 8, 1, 31-40, 1980 · doi:10.1002/eqe.4290080104
[59] Zienkiewicz, OC; Wood, WL; Hine, NW; Taylor, RL, A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 1: general formulation and applications, Int J Numer Methods Eng, 20, 8, 1529-1552, 1984 · Zbl 0557.65041 · doi:10.1002/nme.1620200814
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.