×

Adaptive event-triggered resilient stabilization for nonlinear semi-Markov jump systems subject to DoS attacks. (English) Zbl 1532.93181

Summary: This article investigates the problem of adaptive event-triggered resilient stabilization for nonlinear semi-Markov jump systems with DoS attacks. In this article, both DoS attacks and event-triggered transmission strategy (ETTS) are considered. The DoS attacks may disturb the event-triggered strategy, which implies that the original inequality condition of ETTS will no longer be satisfied. Different from the traditional ETTS, the adaptive ETTS is designed to reduce bandwidth usage. Based on the adaptive ETTS and resilient controller, the sufficient condition for stochastic stability of the closed-loop system is proposed. Then, the calculation method of controller and observer parameters is given in the form of linear matrix inequality. Finally, the proposed adaptive event-triggered resilient controller is applied to a single-link robot arm model, which can show effectiveness of the proposed method.
{© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.}

MSC:

93C40 Adaptive control/observation systems
93C65 Discrete event control/observation systems
93D21 Adaptive or robust stabilization
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory
93E15 Stochastic stability in control theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] SworderD, RogersR. An LQ‐solution to a control problem associated with a solar thermal central receiver. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1983;28(10):971‐978.
[2] KavikumarR, SakthivelR, KwonO, KaviarasanB. Reliable non‐fragile memory state feedback controller design for fuzzy Markov jump systems. Nonlinear Anal Hybrid Syst. 2020;35:100828. · Zbl 1433.93039
[3] JagerMA, HamprechtF. Principal component imagery for the quality monitoring of dynamic laser welding processes. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2009;56(4):1307‐1313.
[4] HeH, QiW, LiuZ, WangM. Adaptive attack‐resilient control for Markov jump system with additive attacks. Nonlinear Dyn. 2021;103(2):1585‐1598. · Zbl 1517.93050
[5] ShenH, MenY, WuZ, CaoJ, LuG. Network‐based quantized control for fuzzy singularly perturbed semi‐Markov jump systems and its application. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. 2018;66(3):1‐11.
[6] TianY, YanH, ZhangH, ZhangX, PengY. Dynamic output‐feedback control of linear semi‐Markov jump systems with incomplete semi‐Markov kernel. Automatica. 2020;17:108997. · Zbl 1442.93045
[7] ZongG, RenH. Guaranteed cost finite‐time control for semi‐Markov jump systems with event‐triggered scheme and quantization input. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2019;29(15):5251‐5273. · Zbl 1426.93316
[8] QiW, HouY, ParkJ, ZongG, ShiY. SMC for uncertain discrete‐time semi‐Markov switching systems. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Exp Briefs. 2022;69(3):1452‐1456.
[9] NieR, HeS, LiuF, LuanX. Sliding mode controller design for conic‐type nonlinear semi‐Markovian jumping systems of time‐delayed Chua’s circuit. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(4):2467‐2475.
[10] WangG, XuL. Almost sure stability and stabilization of Markovian jump systems with stochastic switching. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2021;67(3):1529‐1536. · Zbl 1537.93778
[11] WangG, SunY. Almost sure stabilization of continuous‐time jump linear systems via a stochastic scheduled controller. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022;52(5):2712‐2724.
[12] NgoPD, ShinYC. Modeling and robust controlling of laser welding process on high strength titanium alloy using fuzzy basis function networks and robust Takagi‐Sugeno fuzzy controller. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;89(1-4):1089‐1102.
[13] LiY, YangY, ChaiT, ChenT. Stochastic detection against deception attacks in CPS: performance evaluation and game‐theoretic analysis. Automatica. 2022;144:110461. · Zbl 1498.93292
[14] LiuH, LiY, HanQL, RaT. Watermark‐based proactive defense strategy design For cyber‐physical systems with unknown‐but‐bounded noises. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2022. doi:10.1109/TAC.2022.3184396 · Zbl 07744822
[15] WangB, ZhuQ. Stability analysis of discrete time semi‐Markov jump linear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2020;65(12):5415‐5412. · Zbl 1536.93966
[16] NingZ, ZhangL, MesbahA, ColaneriP. Stability analysis and stabilization of discrete‐time non‐homogeneous semi‐Markov jump linear systems: a polytopic approach. Automatica. 2020;120:109080. · Zbl 1448.93341
[17] ZhangL, CaiB, ShiY. Stabilization of hidden semi‐Markov jump systems: emission probability approach. Automatica. 2019;101:87‐95. · Zbl 1415.93287
[18] ShenH, XingM, XuS, BasinM, ParkJ. H∞ stabilization of discrete‐time nonlinear semi‐Markov jump singularly perturbed systems with partially known semi‐Markov Kernel information. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. 2021;68(2):818‐828.
[19] KavikumarR, KwonO, SakthivelR, LeeS, ChoiS, PriyankaS. Sliding mode control for IT2 fuzzy semi‐Markov systems with faults and disturbances. Appl Math Comput. 2020;423:127028. · Zbl 1510.93174
[20] CaiB, YangJ, YuanS, ShiY, ZhangL. Estimation for fuzzy semi‐Markov jump systems with indirectly accessible mode information and nonideal data transmission. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(7):4016‐4027.
[21] ShenH, LiF, CaoJ, WuZ, LuG. Fuzzy‐model‐based output feedback reliable control for network‐based semi‐Markov jump nonlinear systems subject to redundant channels. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2020;50(11):4599‐4609.
[22] KarthickS, SakthivelR, AlzahraniF, LeelamaniA. Synchronization of semi‐Markov coupled neural networks with impulse effects and leakage delay. Neurocomputing. 2020;386(21):221‐231.
[23] ZhangH, ZhaoX, ZhangL, NiuB, ZongG, XuN. Observer‐based adaptive fuzzy hierarchical sliding mode control of uncertain under‐actuated switched nonlinear systems with input quantization. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2022;32(14):8163‐8185. doi:10.1002/rnc.6269 · Zbl 1528.93076
[24] ZhangH, ZhaoX, WangH, ZongG, XuN. Hierarchical sliding‐mode surface‐based adaptive actor‐critic optimal control for switched nonlinear systems with unknown perturbation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2022. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3183991
[25] LiY, WangH, ZhaoX, XuN. Event‐triggered adaptive tracking control for uncertain fractional‐order nonstrict‐feedback nonlinear systems via command filtering. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2022;32(14):7987‐8011. doi:10.1002/rnc.6255 · Zbl 1528.93139
[26] LiuS, NiuB, ZongG, ZhaoX, XuN. Data‐driven‐based event‐triggered optimal control of unknown nonlinear systems with input constraints. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022;109(2):891‐909.
[27] QiW, HouY, ZongG, AhnCK. Finite‐time event‐triggered control for semi‐Markovian switching cyber‐physical systems with FDI attacks and applications. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. 2021;68(6):2665‐2674.
[28] JinY, QiW, ZongG. Finite‐time synchronization of delayed semi‐Markov neural networks with dynamic event‐triggered scheme. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2021;19(6):2297‐2308.
[29] ShenH, ChenM, WuZ, CaoJ, ParkJ. Reliable event‐triggered asynchronous extended passive control for semi‐Markov jump fuzzy systems and its application. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2020;28(8):1708‐1722.
[30] WangJ, WangY, YanH, CaoJ, ShenH. Hybrid event‐based leader‐following consensus of nonlinear multiagent systems with semi‐Markov jump parameters. IEEE Syst J. 2022;16(1):397‐408.
[31] QiW, ZongG, ZhengW. Adaptive event‐triggered SMC for stochastic switching systems with semi‐Markov process and application to boost converter circuit model. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. 2021;68(2):786‐796.
[32] LuZ, RanG, XuF, LuJ. Novel mixed‐triggered filter design for interval type‐2 fuzzy nonlinear Markovian jump systems with randomly occurring packet dropouts. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019;97:1525‐1540. · Zbl 1430.60068
[33] DuZ, KaoY, KarimiH, ZhaoX. Interval type‐2 fuzzy sampled‐data
[( {H}_{\infty } \]\) control for nonlinear unreliable networked control systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2020;28(7):1434‐1448.
[34] ShenH, WangT, ChenM, LuJ. Nonfragile mixed
[( {H}_{\infty }/{L}_2 \]\)‐
[( {L}_{\infty } \]\) state estimation for repeated scalar nonlinear systems with Markov jumping parameters and redundant channels. Nonlinear Dyn. 2018;91:641‐654. · Zbl 1390.93289
[35] ZhangD, ShenY, ZhouS, DongX, YuL. Distributed secure platoon control of connected vehicles subject to DoS attack: theory and application. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(11):7269‐7278.
[36] SunQ, ZhangK, ShiY. Resilient model predictive control of cyber‐physical systems under DoS attacks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2020;16(7):4920‐4927.
[37] RotondoD, SanchezH, PuigV, EscobetT, QuevedoJ. A virtual actuator approach for the secure control of networked LPV systems under pulse‐width modulated DoS attacks. Neurocomputing. 2019;365:21‐30.
[38] HuS, YuanP, YueD, DouC, ChengZ, ZhangY. Attack‐resilient event‐triggered controller design of DC microgrids under DoS attacks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap. 2020;67(2):699‐710. · Zbl 1469.94243
[39] DongT, GongY. Leader‐following secure consensus for second‐order multi‐agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and event‐triggered control strategy under DoS attack. Neurocomputing. 2020;416:95‐102.
[40] SunH, PengC, ZhangW, YangT, WangZ. Security‐based resilient event‐triggered control of networked control systems under denial of service attacks. J Frankl Inst. 2019;356(17):10277‐10295. · Zbl 1425.93186
[41] AminiA, AsifA, MohammadiA. RQ‐CEASE: a resilient quantized collaborative event‐triggered average‐consensus sampled‐data framework under denial of service attack. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021;51(11):7027‐7039.
[42] LuW, YinX, FuY, GaoZ. Observer‐based event‐triggered predictive control for networked control systems under DoS attacks. Sensors. 2020;20(23):6866.
[43] GuZ, AhnC, YueD, XieX. Event‐triggered
[( {H}_{\infty } \]\) filtering for T‐S fuzzy‐model‐based nonlinear networked systems with multisensors against DoS attacks. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2022;52(6):5311‐5321. doi:10.1109/TCYB.2020.3030028
[44] ZengH, HeY, WuM, SheJ. Free‐matrix‐based integral inequality for stability analysis of systems with time‐varying delay. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2015;60(10):2768‐2772. · Zbl 1360.34149
[45] CaoZ, NiuY, SongJ. Finite‐time sliding‐mode control of Markovian jump cyber‐physical systems against randomly occurring injection attacks. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2020;65(3):1264‐1271. · Zbl 1533.93672
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.