×

Derivatives-based portfolio decisions: an expected utility insight. (English) Zbl 1492.91323

Summary: This paper challenges the use of stocks in portfolio construction, instead we demonstrate that Asian derivatives, straddles, or baskets could be more convenient substitutes. Our results are obtained under the assumptions of the Black-Scholes-Merton setting, uncovering a hidden benefit of derivatives that complements their well-known gains for hedging, risk management, and to increase utility in market incompleteness. The new insights are also transferable to more advanced stochastic settings. The analysis relies on the infinite number of optimal choices of derivatives for a maximized expected utility theory agent; we propose risk exposure minimization as an additional optimization criterion inspired by regulations. Working with two assets, for simplicity, we demonstrate that only two derivatives are needed to maximize utility while minimizing risky exposure. In a comparison among one-asset options, e.g. American, European, Asian, Calls and Puts, we demonstrate that the deepest out-of-the-money Asian products available are the best choices to minimize exposure. We also explore optimal selections among straddles, which are better practical choice than out-of-the-money Calls and Puts due to liquidity and rebalancing needs. The optimality of multi-asset derivatives is also considered, establishing that a basket option could be a better choice than one-asset Asian call/put in many realistic situations.

MSC:

91G10 Portfolio theory
91G20 Derivative securities (option pricing, hedging, etc.)
91B16 Utility theory

References:

[1] Bertsimas, D., Tsitsiklis, J.N.: Introduction to Linear Optimization, Vol. 6. Athena Scientific Belmont, MA (1997)
[2] Bjerksund, P.; Stensland, G., Closed-form approximation of American options, Scand J Manage, 9, S87-S99 (1993) · doi:10.1016/0956-5221(93)90009-H
[3] Black, F.; Scholes, M., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J Polit Econ, 81, 3, 637-654 (1973) · Zbl 1092.91524 · doi:10.1086/260062
[4] Chen, N.; Liu, Y., American option sensitivities estimation via a generalized infinitesimal perturbation analysis approach, Oper Res, 62, 3, 616-632 (2014) · Zbl 1307.91172 · doi:10.1287/opre.2014.1273
[5] Goldman, MB; Sosin, HB; Gatto, MA, Path dependent options:“ buy at the low, sell at the high”, J Finance, 34, 5, 1111-1127 (1979)
[6] Haugh, MB; Lo, AW, Asset allocation and derivatives, Quant Finance, 1, 45-72 (2001) · Zbl 1405.91694 · doi:10.1080/713665551
[7] Kemna, AG; Vorst, AC, A pricing method for options based on average asset values, J Bank Finance, 14, 1, 113-129 (1990) · doi:10.1016/0378-4266(90)90039-5
[8] Kraft, H., Elasticity approach to portfolio optimization, Math Methods Oper Res, 58, 1, 159-182 (2003) · Zbl 1042.93060 · doi:10.1007/s001860300296
[9] Liu, J.; Pan, J., Dynamic derivative strategies, J Financ Econ, 69, 3, 401-430 (2003) · doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00118-1
[10] Maverick, J.: How Big is the Derivatives Market? https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/052715/how-big-derivatives-market.asp (2020)
[11] Merton, R.C.: Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev Econ Stat, 247-257 (1969)
[12] Merton, R.C.: Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J Econ Manage Sci, 141-183 (1973) · Zbl 1257.91043
[13] Mi, H.; Xu, L., Optimal investment with derivatives and pricing in an incomplete market, J Comput Appl Math, 368, 112, 522 (2020) · Zbl 1431.91402
[14] Rardin, R.L., Rardin, R.L.: Optimization in Operations Research, Vol. 166. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ (1998)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.