×

A computational framework for conceptual blending. (English) Zbl 1443.68139

Summary: We present a computational framework for conceptual blending, a concept invention method that is advocated in cognitive science as a fundamental and uniquely human engine for creative thinking. Our framework treats a crucial part of the blending process, namely the generalisation of input concepts, as a search problem that is solved by means of modern answer set programming methods to find commonalities among input concepts. We also address the problem of pruning the space of possible blends by introducing metrics that capture most of the so-called optimality principles, described in the cognitive science literature as guidelines to produce meaningful and serendipitous blends. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate how our system invents novel concepts and theories in domains where creativity is crucial, namely mathematics and music.

MSC:

68T01 General topics in artificial intelligence

Software:

Hets; CASL; Clingo; IsaCoSy

References:

[1] Anderson, D.; Zalta, E., Frege, boolos and logical objects, J. Philos. Log., 33, 1-26 (2004) · Zbl 1052.03003
[2] Baral, C., Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving (2003), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1056.68139
[3] Boden, M. A., Creativity, (Boden, M. A., Artificial Intelligence (Handbook of Perception and Cognition) (1996), Academic Press), 267-291 · Zbl 0939.68735
[4] Bou, F.; Eppe, M.; Plaza, E.; Schorlemmer, M., D2.1: reasoning with Amalgams (October 2014), Technical report, COINVENT Project, available at
[5] Codescu, M.; Kuksa, E.; Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Neuhaus, F., Ontohub: a semantic repository engine for heterogeneous ontologies, Appl. Ontol. (2017)
[6] Colton, S.; Charnley, J. W.; Pease, A., Computational creativity theory: the FACE and IDEA descriptive models, (Ventura, D.; Gervás, P.; Harrell, D. F.; Maher, M. L.; Pease, A.; Wiggins, G. A., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computational Creativity, Mexico City, Mexico, April 27-29, 2011 (2011)), 90-95
[7] Confalonieri, R.; Nieves, J. C., Nested preferences in answer set programming, Fundam. Inform., 113, 1, 19-39 (2011) · Zbl 1243.68140
[8] Confalonieri, R.; Prade, H., Using possibilistic logic for modeling qualitative decision: answer set programming algorithms, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 55, 2, 711-738 (2014) · Zbl 1316.68173
[9] Confalonieri, R.; Corneli, J.; Pease, A.; Plaza, E.; Schorlemmer, M., Using argumentation to evaluate concept blends in combinatorial creativity, (Toivonen, H.; Colton, S.; Cook, M.; Ventura, D., Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, Park City, Utah, USA, June 29-July 2, 2015 (2015)), 174-181
[10] R. Confalonieri, M. Schorlemmer, E. Plaza, M. Eppe, O. Kutz, R. Peñaloza, Upward refinement for conceptual blending in description logic: an asp-based approach and case study in EL++, in: Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops 2015 Episode 1: The Argentine Winter of Ontology co-located with the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.; R. Confalonieri, M. Schorlemmer, E. Plaza, M. Eppe, O. Kutz, R. Peñaloza, Upward refinement for conceptual blending in description logic: an asp-based approach and case study in EL++, in: Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops 2015 Episode 1: The Argentine Winter of Ontology co-located with the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.
[11] Confalonieri, R.; Eppe, M.; Schorlemmer, M.; Kutz, O.; Peñaloza, R.; Plaza, E., Upward refinement operators for conceptual blending in the description logic EL++, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 1-31 (2016)
[12] R. Confalonieri, E. Plaza, M. Schorlemmer, A process model for concept invention, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2016.; R. Confalonieri, E. Plaza, M. Schorlemmer, A process model for concept invention, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2016.
[13] Confalonieri, R.; Schorlemmer, M.; Kutz, O.; Peñaloza, R.; Plaza, E.; Eppe, M., Conceptual blending in EL++, (Lenzerini, M.; Peñaloza, R., Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics. Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics, Cape Town, South Africa, April 22-25. Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics. Proceedings of the 29th International Workshop on Description Logics, Cape Town, South Africa, April 22-25, CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 1577 (2016), CEUR-WS.org)
[14] Confalonieri, R.; Kutz, O.; Galliani, P.; Peñaloza, R.; Porello, D.; Schorlemmer, M.; Troquard, N., Coherence, similarity, and concept generalisation, (Artale, A.; Glimm, B.; Kontchakov, R., Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Description Logics. Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Description Logics, Montpellier, France, July 18-21, 2017. Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Description Logics. Proceedings of the 30th International Workshop on Description Logics, Montpellier, France, July 18-21, 2017, CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 1879 (2017), CEUR-WS.org)
[15] (Confalonieri, R.; Pease, A.; Schorlemmer, M.; Besold, T.; Kutz, O.; Maclean, E.; Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M., Concept Invention: Foundations, Implementation, Social Aspects and Applications. Concept Invention: Foundations, Implementation, Social Aspects and Applications, Comput. Synth. Creat. Syst. (2018), Springer)
[16] M. Eppe, M. Bhatt, Narrative based postdictive reasoning for cognitive robotics, in: International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, CR, 2013.; M. Eppe, M. Bhatt, Narrative based postdictive reasoning for cognitive robotics, in: International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, CR, 2013.
[17] Eppe, M.; Bhatt, M., Approximate postdictive reasoning with answer set programming, J. Appl. Log., 13, 4, 676-719 (2015) · Zbl 1457.68255
[18] M. Eppe, M. Bhatt, F. Dylla, Approximate epistemic planning with postdiction as answer-set programming, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 2013.; M. Eppe, M. Bhatt, F. Dylla, Approximate epistemic planning with postdiction as answer-set programming, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 2013. · Zbl 1405.68348
[19] Eppe, M.; Bhatt, M.; Suchan, J.; Tietzen, B., ExpCog: experiments in commonsense cognitive robotics, (International Workshop on Cognitive Robotics. International Workshop on Cognitive Robotics, CogRob (2014))
[20] Eppe, M.; Confalonieri, R.; Maclean, E.; Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, M. A.; Cambouropoulos, E.; Schorlemmer, W. M.; Codescu, M.; Kühnberger, K., Computational invention of cadences and chord progressions by conceptual chord-blending, (Yang, Q.; Wooldridge, M., Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 25-31, 2015 (2015), AAAI Press), 2445-2451
[21] Eppe, M.; Maclean, E.; Confalonieri, R.; Kutz, O.; Schorlemmer, W. M.; Plaza, E., ASP, amalgamation, and the conceptual blending workflow, (Calimeri, F.; Ianni, G.; Truszczynski, M., Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning - 13th International Conference, LPNMR 2015, Lexington, KY, USA, September 27-30, 2015. Proceedings. Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning - 13th International Conference, LPNMR 2015, Lexington, KY, USA, September 27-30, 2015. Proceedings, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., vol. 9345 (2015), Springer), 309-316 · Zbl 1467.68165
[22] Eppe, M.; Trott, S.; Feldman, J., Exploiting deep semantics and compositionality of natural language for human-robot-interaction, (International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS (2016)), 731-738
[23] Eppe, M.; Trott, S.; Raghuram, V.; Feldman, J.; Janin, A., Application-independent and integration-friendly natural language understanding, (Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Global Conference on Artificial Intelligence, GCAI (2016)), 340-352
[24] Fauconnier, G., Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language (1985), MIT Press
[25] Fauconnier, G., Mappings in Thought and Language (1997), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England
[26] Fauconnier, G.; Turner, M., Conceptual integration networks, Cogn. Sci., 22, 2, 133-187 (1998), reprinted in: D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, pp. 303-371
[27] Fauconnier, G.; Turner, M., The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending And The Mind’s Hidden Complexities (2002), Basic Books
[28] M. Gebser, R. Kaminski, B. Kaufmann, M. Ostrowski, T. Schaub, S. Thiele, Engineering an incremental ASP solver, in: International Conference on Logic Programming, LPNMR, 2008.; M. Gebser, R. Kaminski, B. Kaufmann, M. Ostrowski, T. Schaub, S. Thiele, Engineering an incremental ASP solver, in: International Conference on Logic Programming, LPNMR, 2008. · Zbl 1185.68159
[29] Gebser, M.; Kaminski, R.; Kaufmann, B.; Schaub, T., Clingo = ASP + control: preliminary report (2014), CoRR
[30] Gebser, M.; Kaminski, R.; Kaufmann, B.; Lindauer, M.; Ostrowski, M.; Romero, J.; Schaub, T.; Thiele, S., Potassco User Guide 2.0 (May 2015), University of Potsdam, Technical report
[31] Gelfond, M.; Kahl, Y., Knowledge Representation, Reasoning, and the Design of Intelligent Agents: The Answer-Set Programming Approach (2014), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York, NY, USA
[32] Gelfond, M.; Lifschitz, V., The stable model semantics for logic programming, (Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic Programming. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic Programming, ICLP (1988), The MIT Press), 1070-1080
[33] Goguen, J.; Harrell, D. F., Style: a computational and conceptual blending-based approach, (Argamon, S.; Burns, K.; Dubnov, S., The Structure of Style: Algorithmic Approaches to Understanding Manner and Meaning (2010), Springer), 291-316
[34] Goguen, J. A., An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design, (Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents (1999)), 1-39
[35] Goguen, J. A.; Harrell, D. F., Foundations for active multimedia narrative: semiotic spaces and structural blending (2005)
[36] Guhe, M.; Pease, A.; Smaill, A.; Martínez, M.; Schmidt, M.; Gust, H.; Kühnberger, K.-U.; Krumnack, U., A computational account of conceptual blending in basic mathematics, Cogn. Syst. Res., 12, 3-4, 249-265 (2011)
[37] Hampe, B., Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: an introduction, (Hampe, B.; Grady, J. E., From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Cogn. Linguist. Res., vol. 29 (2005), Mouton de Gruyter), 1-12
[38] D.F. Harrell, Shades of computational evocation and meaning: the GRIOT system and improvisational poetry generation, in: 6th Digital Arts and Culture Conference, 2005.; D.F. Harrell, Shades of computational evocation and meaning: the GRIOT system and improvisational poetry generation, in: 6th Digital Arts and Culture Conference, 2005.
[39] Harrell, D. F., Theory and Technology for Computational Narrative: An Approach to Generative and Interactive Narrative With Bases in Algebraic Semiotics and Cognitive Linguistics (2007), University of California: University of California San Diego, Ph.D. thesis
[40] Hedblom, M. M.; Kutz, O.; Neuhaus, F., Choosing the right path: image schema theory as a foundation for concept invention, J. Artif. Gen. Intell., 6, 1, 21-54 (2015)
[41] Hedblom, M. M.; Kutz, O.; Neuhaus, F., Image schemas in computational conceptual blending, Cogn. Syst. Res., 39, 42-57 (2016)
[42] Ireland, A.; Bundy, A., Productive use of failure in inductive proof, J. Autom. Reason., 16, 1-2, 79-111 (1996) · Zbl 0847.68103
[43] Johansson, M.; Dixon, L.; Bundy, A., Conjecture synthesis for inductive theories, J. Autom. Reason., 47, 251-289 (2011) · Zbl 1243.68268
[44] Johnson, M., The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reasoning (1987), The University of Chicago Press
[45] Jordanous, A., Stepping back to progress forwards: setting standards for meta-evaluation of computational creativity, (Colton, S.; Ventura, D.; Lavrac, N.; Cook, M., Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity, Ljubljana, Slovenia, June 10-13, 2014 (2014)), 129-136, computationalcreativity.net
[46] Koestler, A., The Act of Creation (1964), Hutchinson & Co.
[47] Kowalski, R., Predicate logic as programming language, (Proceedings of International Federation for Information Processing (1974)), 569-574 · Zbl 0297.68006
[48] Kuhn, W., An image-schematic account of spatial categories, (Winter, S.; Duckham, M.; Kulik, L.; Kuipers, B., Spatial Information Theory. Spatial Information Theory, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., vol. 4736 (2007), Springer), 152-168
[49] Kutz, O.; Bateman, J.; Neuhaus, F.; Mossakowski, T.; Bhatt, M., E pluribus unum: formalisation, use-cases, and computational support for conceptual blending, (Besold, T. R.; Schorlemmer, M.; Smaill, A., Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines, Thinking Machines (2014), Atlantis/Springer)
[50] O. Kutz, T. Mossakowski, F. Neuhaus, M. Codescu, Blending in the Hub: towards a computational concept invention platform, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2014.; O. Kutz, T. Mossakowski, F. Neuhaus, M. Codescu, Blending in the Hub: towards a computational concept invention platform, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2014.
[51] Lakoff, G., Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things (1987), University of Chicago Press
[52] Lakoff, G.; Johnson, M., Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (1999), Basic Books
[53] Malcolm, G., Software Engineering with OBJ: Algebraic Specification in Action (2000), Kluwer
[54] Mandler, J. M.; Pagán Cánovas, C., On defining image schemas, Lang. Cogn., 6, 1-23 (2014)
[55] P. Martins, S. Pollak, T. Urbanĉiĉ, A. Cardoso, Optimality principles in computational approaches to conceptual blending: do we need them (at) all? in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2016.; P. Martins, S. Pollak, T. Urbanĉiĉ, A. Cardoso, Optimality principles in computational approaches to conceptual blending: do we need them (at) all? in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2016.
[56] Montano-Rivas, O.; McCasland, R.; Dixon, L.; Bundy, A., Scheme-based synthesis of inductive theories, (MICAI. MICAI, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., vol. 6437 (2010)), 348-361
[57] Mossakowski, T., Colimits of order-sorted specifications, (Recent Trends in Algebraic Development Techniques. Recent Trends in Algebraic Development Techniques, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., vol. 1376 (1998), Springer: Springer Berlin), 316-332 · Zbl 0902.18002
[58] Mossakowski, T.; Maeder, C.; Lüttich, K., The heterogeneous tool set, Hets, (International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS (2007), Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 519-522
[59] Mossakowski, T.; Codescu, M.; Neuhaus, F.; Kutz, O., The distributed ontology, modelling and specification language - DOL, (The Road to Universal Logic - Festschrift for 50th birthday of Jean-Yves Beziau, vol. II. The Road to Universal Logic - Festschrift for 50th birthday of Jean-Yves Beziau, vol. II, Stud. Univers. Log. (2015), Birkhäuser) · Zbl 1409.68284
[60] Mosses, P. D., CASL Reference Manual - The Complete Documentation of the Common Algebraic Specification Language (2004), Springer · Zbl 1046.68001
[61] Ontañón, S.; Plaza, E., Amalgams: a formal approach for combining multiple case solutions, (Bichindaritz, I.; Montani, S., Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development. Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development, ICCBR (2010), Springer), 257-271
[62] A. Pease, J. Corneli, Evaluating creativity, in: Concept Invention: Foundations, Implementation, Social Aspects and Applications, Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-65602-1, http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319656014; A. Pease, J. Corneli, Evaluating creativity, in: Concept Invention: Foundations, Implementation, Social Aspects and Applications, Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-65602-1, http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319656014
[63] Pereira, F. C., A Computational Model of Creativity (2005), Universidade de Coimbra, Ph.D. thesis
[64] Pereira, F. C., Creativity and Artificial Intelligence: A Conceptual Blending Approach (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
[65] F.C. Pereira, A. Cardoso, The boat-house visual blending experiment, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in AI and Cognitive Science, ECAI 2002, Lyon, France, 2002.; F.C. Pereira, A. Cardoso, The boat-house visual blending experiment, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in AI and Cognitive Science, ECAI 2002, Lyon, France, 2002.
[66] Pereira, F. C.; Cardoso, A., Optimality principles for conceptual blending: a first computational approach, AISB J., 1, 4, 351-370 (2003)
[67] Pereira, F. C.; Cardoso, A., The horse-birdcreature generationexperiment, AISB J., 1, 3, 257-280 (2003)
[68] Pereira, F. C.; Cardoso, A., Experiments with free concept generation in Divago, Knowl.-Based Syst., 19, 7, 459-470 (2006)
[69] Pierce, B., Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists (1991), MIT Press · Zbl 0875.18001
[70] Porello, D.; Troquard, N.; Confalonieri, R.; Galliani, P.; Kutz, O.; Peñaloza, R., Repairing socially aggregated ontologies using axiom weakening, (Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, PRIMA 2017, October 30-November 3, Nice, France (2017), Springer) · Zbl 1498.68309
[71] M. Quillian, Semantic Memory. Semantic Information Processing, 1968.; M. Quillian, Semantic Memory. Semantic Information Processing, 1968. · Zbl 0187.13301
[72] Ritchie, G., Assessing creativity, (Wiggins, G., Proceedings of the AISB’01 Symposium on AI and Creativity in Arts and Science (2001)), 3-11
[73] M. Schorlemmer, A. Smaill, K.-U. Kühnberger, O. Kutz, S. Colton, E. Cambouropoulos, A. Pease, COINVENT: towards a computational concept invention theory, in: Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2014.; M. Schorlemmer, A. Smaill, K.-U. Kühnberger, O. Kutz, S. Colton, E. Cambouropoulos, A. Pease, COINVENT: towards a computational concept invention theory, in: Fifth International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2014.
[74] M. Schorlemmer, R. Confalonieri, E. Plaza, The Yoneda Path to the Buddhist Monk Blend, in: First International Workshop on Cognition and Ontologies, CAOS 2016, Annecy, France, 6th July, 2016.; M. Schorlemmer, R. Confalonieri, E. Plaza, The Yoneda Path to the Buddhist Monk Blend, in: First International Workshop on Cognition and Ontologies, CAOS 2016, Annecy, France, 6th July, 2016.
[75] Schorlemmer, M.; Confalonieri, R.; Plaza, E., Coherent concept invention, (Besold, T. R.; Kutz, O.; León, C., Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, C3GI 2016, co-located with the 28th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, C3GI 2016, co-located with the 28th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, ESSLLI 2016, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy, August 20-22, 2016. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, C3GI 2016, co-located with the 28th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, C3GI 2016, co-located with the 28th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, ESSLLI 2016, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy, August 20-22, 2016, CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 1767 (2016), CEUR-WS.org)
[76] Schwering, A.; Krumnack, U.; Kühnberger, K.-U.; Gust, H., Syntactic principles of heuristic-driven theory projection, Cogn. Syst. Res., 10, 3, 251-269 (2009)
[77] Amant, R. St.; Morrison, C. T.; Chang, Y.-H.; Cohen, P. R.; Beal, C., An image schema language, (International Conference on Cognitive Modeling. International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, ICCM (2006)), 292-297
[78] Thagard, P., Coherence in Thought and Action (2000), The MIT Press
[79] Thagard, P., The Brain and the Meaning of Life (2010), Princeton University Press
[80] Thagard, P.; Stewart, T. C., The AHA! experience: creativity through emergent binding in neural networks, Cogn. Sci., 35, 1, 1-33 (2011)
[81] S. Trott, M. Eppe, J. Feldman, Recognizing intention from natural language: clarification dialog and construction grammar, in: Workshop on Communicating Intentions in Human-Robot Interaction, 2016.; S. Trott, M. Eppe, J. Feldman, Recognizing intention from natural language: clarification dialog and construction grammar, in: Workshop on Communicating Intentions in Human-Robot Interaction, 2016.
[82] T. Veale, From conceptual “mash-ups” to “bad-ass” blends: a robust computational model of conceptual blending, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2012.; T. Veale, From conceptual “mash-ups” to “bad-ass” blends: a robust computational model of conceptual blending, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, 2012.
[83] Veale, T.; Donoghue, D. O., Computation and blending, Cogn. Linguist., 11, 3-4, 253-282 (2000)
[84] Veale, T.; Keane, M., The competence of sub-optimal theories of structure mapping on hard analogies, (IJCAI (1997)), 232-237
[85] Walton, L.; Worboys, M., An algebraic approach to image schemas for geographic space, (Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT, France (2009)), 357-370
[86] Wiggins, G. A., A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems, Knowl.-Based Syst., 19, 7, 449-458 (2006)
[87] M. Ẑnidarŝiĉ, A. Cardoso, P. Gervas, P. Martins, R. Hervas, A. Alves, H. Oliveira, P. Xiao, S. Linkola, H. Toivonen, J. Kranjc, N. Lavraĉ, Computational creativity infrastructure for online software composition: a conceptual blending use case, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, Paris, France, 1st July, 2016.; M. Ẑnidarŝiĉ, A. Cardoso, P. Gervas, P. Martins, R. Hervas, A. Alves, H. Oliveira, P. Xiao, S. Linkola, H. Toivonen, J. Kranjc, N. Lavraĉ, Computational creativity infrastructure for online software composition: a conceptual blending use case, in: International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, Paris, France, 1st July, 2016.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.