×

Inverse design of anti-reflection coatings using the nonlinear approximate inverse. (English) Zbl 1342.65237

Summary: We consider a multi-frequency inverse scattering problem arising in the design of anti-reflection coatings. These thin films are deposited onto photovoltaic solar cells to enhance their performance. The objective is to determine the space-dependent refractive index in an inhomogeneous optical layer from the reflection coefficients at the surface. The relevant model yields a boundary value problem for the one-dimensional (1D) Helmholtz equation, which we formulate as an equivalent integral equation. The resulting inverse problem is nonlinear and ill-posed. We consider a series expansion of the field depending on the order of nonlinearity of the model. The first-order solution is obtained by using the Born approximation which is valid for weak scattering. Stronger scatterers are sought by considering a nonlinearity of higher order. The mathematical and numerical framework is provided by the (noniterative) method of the approximate inverse (AI) for nonlinear inverse problems. Numerical results are presented to attest the efficiency and stability of the method.

MSC:

65R10 Numerical methods for integral transforms
65R30 Numerical methods for ill-posed problems for integral equations
78A46 Inverse problems (including inverse scattering) in optics and electromagnetic theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1002/9781118172841 · doi:10.1002/9781118172841
[2] DOI: 10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00365-2 · doi:10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00365-2
[3] DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.30.000656 · doi:10.1364/JOSAA.30.000656
[4] DOI: 10.1023/A:1012510015703 · Zbl 1018.78006 · doi:10.1023/A:1012510015703
[5] DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01446-1 · doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01446-1
[6] Lesnic D, Math-in-Ind. Case Stud. J 2 pp 155– (2010)
[7] DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.119 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.119
[8] Alakel Abazid M, Int. J. Renew. Technol
[9] DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.016 · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.016
[10] DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90109-1 · Zbl 0468.65045 · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(81)90109-1
[11] DOI: 10.1364/OL.33.002101 · doi:10.1364/OL.33.002101
[12] DOI: 10.1063/1.1645977 · Zbl 1068.34008 · doi:10.1063/1.1645977
[13] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/8/3/002 · Zbl 0760.34017 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/8/3/002
[14] Dunn MH, NASA Contractor Rep 55 pp 157– (1984)
[15] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/12/125009 · Zbl 1209.78010 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/26/12/125009
[16] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/30/10/105007 · Zbl 1327.35429 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/30/10/105007
[17] Li J, Inverse Prob 27 (2011)
[18] DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139644181 · doi:10.1017/CBO9781139644181
[19] Kak AC, Principles of computerized tomographic imaging (1988)
[20] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/2/009 · Zbl 1073.35213 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/20/2/009
[21] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/4/045020 · Zbl 1155.35492 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/24/4/045020
[22] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/1/015007 · Zbl 1185.35328 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/26/1/015007
[23] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/9/095001 · Zbl 1290.78010 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/29/9/095001
[24] DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-84808-6 · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-84808-6
[25] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/15/2/009 · Zbl 0933.65060 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/15/2/009
[26] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/6/3/011 · Zbl 0713.65040 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/6/3/011
[27] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/12/2/005 · Zbl 0851.65036 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/12/2/005
[28] Louis AK, Inverse Problems in Engineering - Theory and Practice pp 367– (1998)
[29] DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03537-5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03537-5
[30] DOI: 10.1137/070700863 · Zbl 1177.65201 · doi:10.1137/070700863
[31] Louis AK, Inverse Prob 27 (2011)
[32] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/6/065015 · Zbl 1273.65069 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/29/6/065015
[33] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/8/085006 · Zbl 1218.47023 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/26/8/085006
[34] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/28/4/045013 · Zbl 1237.65147 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/28/4/045013
[35] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123010 · Zbl 1188.35197 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123010
[36] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.87.977 · Zbl 0047.22407 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.87.977
[37] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.102.559 · Zbl 0070.21906 · doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.559
[38] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/7/3/008 · Zbl 0737.35155 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/7/3/008
[39] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/14/3/003 · Zbl 0913.65123 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/14/3/003
[40] DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.20.000903 · doi:10.1364/JOSAA.20.000903
[41] DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/9/095007 · Zbl 1173.35734 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/25/9/095007
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.