×

Effects of customer response to fashion product stockout on holding costs, order sizes, and profitability in omnichannel retailing. (English) Zbl 07765936

Summary: In retailing practice, customers may actively respond in one of the following ways after experiencing stockout of a preferred brand: switch to a substitutable brand, switch to another store (where the preferred brand could be available), or delay purchase (backlogging). This paper presents a model of active customer responses to stockout of fashion products. In the single-period model, a retailer maximizes profit by selling two substitutable brands through two different stores. Analytical results and numerical experiments suggest that active response to stockout increase the retailer’s profitability due to (a) additional revenue from backlogging and brand and store switching and (b) decrease in optimal order size resulting in lower holding costs. Omnichannel fulfillment offers additional opportunities for retailers to benefit from active responses to stockout.
{© 2018 The Authors. International Transactions in Operational Research © 2018 International Federation of Operational Research Societies}

MSC:

90-XX Operations research, mathematical programming
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ailawadi, K.L., Farris, P.W., 2017. Managing multi‐ and omni‐channel distribution: metrics and research directions. Journal of Retailing93, 1, 120-135.
[2] Anupindi, R., Bassok, Y., 1999. Centralization of stocks: retailers vs. manufacturer. Management Science45, 2, 178-191. · Zbl 1231.90007
[3] Beck, N., Rygl, D., 2015. Categorization of multiple channel retailing in multi‐, cross‐, and omni‐channel retailing for retailers and retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 170-178.
[4] Cachon, G.P., Swinney, R., 2011. The value of fast fashion: quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Management Science57, 4, 778-795. · Zbl 1214.90070
[5] Corsten, D., Gruen, T., 2005. On shelf availability: an examination of the extent, the causes, and the efforts to address retail out‐of‐stocks. In Doukidis, G.J. (ed.), Vrechopoulos, A.P. (ed.) (eds) Consumer Driven Electronic Transformation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 131-149.
[6] Drake, M.J.,Pentico, D.W., 2011. Price discounts for increased profitability under partial backordering. International Transactions in Operational Research18, 1, 87-101. · Zbl 1219.90008
[7] ECR Europe. 2003. Optimal Shelf Availability: Increasing Shopper Satisfaction at the Moment of Truth. ECR Europe and Roland Berger, Kontich.
[8] Eppen, G.D., 1979. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi‐location newsboy problem. Management Science25, 5, 498-501. · Zbl 0419.90049
[9] Fadılog̃lu, M.M., Karaşan, O.E., Pınar, M.Ç., 2010. A model and case study for efficient shelf usage and assortment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 180, 1, 105-124. · Zbl 1202.90132
[10] Fernie, J., Sparks, L., 2014. Logistics and Retail Management: Emerging Issues and New Challenges in the Retail Supply Chain. Kogan Page, London.
[11] Fisher, M., Rajaram, K., Raman, A., 2001. Optimizing inventory replenishment of retail fashion products. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management3, 3, 230-241.
[12] Gao, F., Su, X., 2016a. Omnichannel retail operations with buy‐online‐and‐pick‐up‐in‐store. Management Science63, 8, 2478-2492.
[13] Gao, F., Su, X., 2016b. Online and offline information for omnichannel retailing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management19, 1, 84-98.
[14] Giri, B.C., Jalan, A.K., Chaudhuri, K.S., 2005. An economic production lot size model with increasing demand, shortages and partial backlogging. International Transactions in Operational Research12, 2, 235-245. · Zbl 1063.90003
[15] Halzack, S., 2016. The surprising thing that got the biggest share of online shopping dollars in 2015. The Washington Post, April 6. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2016/04/06/the-surprising-thing-that-got-the-biggest-share-of-online-shopping-dollars-in-2015/?utm_term=.a28958c85db7 (accessed on February 20, 2017).
[16] Hopp, W.J., Xu, X., 2008. A static approximation for dynamic demand substitution with applications in a competitive market. Operations Research56, 3, 630-645. · Zbl 1167.90330
[17] Khouja, M., 1999. The single‐period (news‐vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research. Omega27, 5, 537-553.
[18] Khouja, M., Mehrez, A., Rabinowitz, G., 1996. A two‐item newsboy problem with substitutability. International Journal of Production Economics44, 3, 267-275.
[19] Kök, A.G., Fisher, M.L., 2007. Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: methodology and application. Operations Research55, 6, 1001-1021. · Zbl 1167.91386
[20] Kurata, H., Ovezmyradov, B., Meuthia, Y., 2017. Stocking decision and supply chain coordination under the occurrence of backlogging, brand switching, and store switching. Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association68, 2E, 33-63.
[21] Lowson, B., King, R., Hunter, A., 1999. Quick Response: Managing the Supply Chain to Meet Consumer Demand. Wiley, Chichester.
[22] McGregorL., 2016. Will the store of the future be RFID‐enabled? Sourcing Journal, January 22. Available at https://sourcingjournalonline.com/will-the-store-of-the-future-be-rfid-enabled/ (accessed on February 20, 2017).
[23] Mishra, B.K., Raghunathan, S., 2004. Retailer‐vs. vendor‐managed inventory and brand competition. Management Science50, 4, 445-457. · Zbl 1232.90076
[24] Mondal, B., Bhunia, A.K., Maiti, M., 2003. An inventory system of ameliorating items for price dependent demand rate. Computers & Industrial Engineering45, 3, 443-456.
[25] Nahmias, S., Cheng, Y., 2009. Production and Operations Analysis, Vol. 4. McGraw‐Hill/Irwin, New York.
[26] Netessine, S., Zhang, F., 2005. Positive vs. negative externalities in inventory management: implications for supply chain design. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management7, 1, 58-73.
[27] Peinkofer, S.T., Esper, T.L., Smith, R.J., Williams, B.D., 2015. Assessing the impact of price promotions on consumer response to online stockouts. Journal of Business Logistics, 36, 3, 260-272.
[28] Pentico, D.W., 2008. The assortment problem: a survey. European Journal of Operational Research190, 2, 295-309.
[29] Piotrowicz, W., Cuthbertson, R., 2014. Introduction to the special issue information technology in retail: toward omnichannel retailing. International Journal of Electronic Commerce18, 4, 5-16.
[30] Rajaram, K., Tang, C.S., 2001. The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising. European Journal of Operational Research135, 3, 582-601. · Zbl 0989.90050
[31] Sampaio, E., Sampaio, M., 2016. Managerial response to stockouts: the effect of remedies on consumer behavior. Production26, 1, 66-77.
[32] Sarkar, B., Sarkar, S., 2013. An improved inventory model with partial backlogging, time varying deterioration and stock‐dependent demand. Economic Modelling30, 924-932.
[33] Sides, R., 2016. Deloitte 2016 Holiday Survey. Ringing in the Retail. Deloitte University Press, London.
[34] Simchi‐Levi, D., Simchi‐Levi, E., Kaminsky, P., 2008. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies. McGraw‐Hill, New York.
[35] Smith, S.A., Agrawal, N., 2000. Management of multi‐item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Operations Research48, 1, 50-64. · Zbl 1106.90306
[36] Taleizadeh, A.A., 2017. Lot‐sizing model with advance payment pricing and disruption in supply under planned partial backordering. International Transactions in Operational Research24, 4, 783-800. · Zbl 1371.90017
[37] Taleizadeh, A.A., Akhavizadegan, F., Ansarifar, J., 2017. Pricing and quality level decisions of substitutable products in online and traditional selling channels: game‐theoretical approaches. International Transactions in Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12487 · Zbl 07766370 · doi:10.1111/itor.12487
[38] Transchel, S., 2017. Inventory management under price‐based and stockout‐based substitution. European Journal of Operational Research262, 3, 996-1008. · Zbl 1375.90024
[39] Tsao, Y.C., 2010. Two‐phase pricing and inventory management for deteriorating and fashion goods under trade credit. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research72, 1, 107-127. · Zbl 1194.90010
[40] Urban, T.L., 2005. Inventory models with inventory‐level‐dependent demand: a comprehensive review and unifying theory. European Journal of Operational Research162, 3, 792-804. · Zbl 1067.90009
[41] Verhoef, P.C., Kannan, P.K., Inman, J.J., 2015. From multi‐channel retailing to omni‐channel retailing: introduction to the special issue on multi‐channel retailing. Journal of Retailing91, 2, 174-181.
[42] VF Corporation, 2017. Jeanswear. Available at http://www.vfc.com/brands/jeanswear (accessed on February 16, 2017).
[43] Walmart. 2017. Our retail divisions. Available at http://corporate.walmart.com/_news_/news-archive/2005/01/07/our-retail-divisions (accessed on February 20, 2017).
[44] Wan, M., Huang, Y., Zhao, L., Deng, T., Fransoo, J.C., 2017. Demand estimation under multi‐store multi‐product substitution in high density traditional retail. European Journal of Operational Research266, 1, 99-111. · Zbl 1403.90059
[45] Zinn, W., Liu, P.C., 2001. Consumer response to retail stockouts. Journal of Business Logistics22, 1, 49-71.
[46] Zinn, W., Liu, P.C., 2008. A comparison of actual and intended consumer behavior in response to retail stockouts. Journal of Business Logistics29, 2, 141-159.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.