×

Technical note: Sochastic optimization with decisions truncated by positively dependent random variables. (English) Zbl 1455.90112

Summary: We study stochastic optimization problems with decisions truncated by random variables. This paper extends existing results in the literature by allowing positively dependent random variables and a two-part fee structure. We develop a transformation technique to convert the original nonconvex problems to equivalent convex ones. We apply our transformation technique to an inventory substitution model with random supply capacities and a two-part fee cost structure. In addition, we extend our results to incorporate the decision maker’s risk attitude.
The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1815.

MSC:

90C15 Stochastic programming
90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
91B05 Risk models (general)

Software:

QRM
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bassok Y, Anupindi R, Akella R (1999) Single-period multiproduct inventory models with substitution. Oper. Res. 47(4):632-642.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 0979.90005
[2] Chen X, Gao X, Pang Z (2018) Preservation of structural properties in optimization with decisions truncated by random variables and its applications. Oper. Res. 66(2):340-357.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1442.90097
[3] Chen Y, Xu M, Zhang ZG (2009) A risk-averse newsvendor model under the CVaR criterion. Oper. Res. 57(4):1040-1044.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1233.90015
[4] Federgruen A, Yang N (2011) Procurement strategies with unreliable suppliers. Oper. Res. 59(4):1033-1039.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1233.90017
[5] Feng Qi, Jia J, ShanthikumarJG (2019) Dynamic multisourcing with dependent supplies. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
[6] Georghiou A, Wiesemann W, Kuhn D (2011) The decision rule approach to optimisation under uncertainty: Methodology and applications in operations management. Working paper, Imperial College London, London.Google Scholar
[7] Henig M, Gerchak Y (1990) The structure of periodic review policies in the presence of random yield. Oper. Res. 38(4):634-643.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 0721.90034
[8] Hu X, Duenyas I, Kapuscinski R (2008) Optimal joint inventory and transshipment control under uncertain capacity. Oper. Res. 56(4):881-897.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1167.90331
[9] Li T, Sethi SP, Zhang J (2013) Supply diversification with responsive pricing. Production Oper. Management 22(2):447-458.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01369.x
[10] McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar · Zbl 1337.91003
[11] Netessine S, Dobson G, Shumsky R (2002) Flexible service capacity: Optimal investment and the impact of demand correlation. Oper. Res. 50(2):376-388.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1163.90343
[12] Rao U, Swaminathan J, Zhang J (2004) Multi-product inventory planning with downward substitution, stochastic demand and setup costs. IIE Trans. 36(1):59-71.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1080/07408170490247304
[13] Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3):21-42.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.21314/JOR.2000.038
[14] Shumsky RA, Zhang F (2009) Dynamic capacity management with substitution. Oper. Res. 57(3) 671-684.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1233.90046
[15] Topkis DM (1998) Supermodularity and Complementarity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1515/9781400822539
[16] Yu Y, · Zbl 1333.90039
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.