×

Technical note – Dynamic data-driven estimation of nonparametric choice models. (English) Zbl 1484.91130

Summary: We study nonparametric estimation of choice models, which was introduced to alleviate unreasonable assumptions in traditional parametric models and is prevalent in several application areas. Existing literature focuses only on the static observational setting where all of the observations are given up front and lacks algorithms that provide explicit convergence rate guarantees or an a priori analysis for the model accuracy versus sparsity trade-off on the actual estimated model returned. As opposed to this, we focus on estimating a nonparametric choice model from observational data in a dynamic setting, where observations are obtained over time. We show that choice model estimation can be cast as a convex-concave saddle point joint estimation and optimization problem, and we provide an online convex optimization-based primal-dual framework for deriving algorithms to solve this problem. By tailoring our framework carefully to the choice model estimation problem, we obtain tractable algorithms with provable convergence guarantees and explicit bounds on the sparsity of the estimated model. Our numerical experiments confirm the effectiveness of the algorithms derived from our framework.

MSC:

91B06 Decision theory
90C30 Nonlinear programming

References:

[1] Ahmadi H , Shanbhag UV (2014) Data-driven first-order methods for misspecified convex optimization problems: Global convergence and rate estimates. Proc. 53rd IEEE Conf. Decision Control (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Los Angeles, CA), 4228-4233.Google Scholar
[2] Block H , Marschak J (1960) Random orderings and stochastic theories of response. Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, Madow WG, Mann HB, eds. Contributions to probability and statistics; essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), 97-132.Google Scholar · Zbl 0096.12104
[3] Desir A , Goyal V , Jagabathula S , Segev D (2016) Assortment optimization under the Mallows model. Lee D, Sugiyama M, Luxburg U, Guyon I, Garnett R, eds. Proc. 30th Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 4707-4715.Google Scholar
[4] Dwork C , Kumar R , Naor M , Sivakumar D (2001) Rank aggregation methods for the web. Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY), 613-622.Google Scholar
[5] Farias VF , Jagabathula S , Shah D (2009) A data-driven approach to modeling choice. Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty J, Williams C, Culotta A, eds. Proc. 22nd Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 504-512.Google Scholar
[6] Farias V , Jagabathula S , Shah D (2013) A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Sci. 59(2):305-322.Link, Google Scholar
[7] Farias VF , Jagabathula S , Shah D (2017) Building optimized and hyperlocal product assortments: A nonparametric choice approach. Preprint, submitted January 24, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2905381.Google Scholar
[8] Freund RM , Grigas P (2016) New analysis and results for the Frank-Wolfe method. Math. Programming 155(1):199-230.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1342.90101 · doi:10.1007/s10107-014-0841-6
[9] Ho-Nguyen N , Kılınç-Karzan F (2019) Exploiting problem structure in optimization under uncertainty via online convex optimization. Math. Programming 177(1):113-147.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1418.90194 · doi:10.1007/s10107-018-1262-8
[10] Jagabathula S , Rusmevichientong P (2019) The limit of rationality in choice modeling: Formulation, computation, and implications. Management Sci. 65(5):2196-2215.Abstract, Google Scholar
[11] Jagabathula S , Shah D (2008) Inferring rankings under constrained sensing. Koller D, Schuurmans D, Bengio Y, Bottou L, eds. Proc. 21st Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 753-760.Google Scholar
[12] Jiang H , Shanbhag UV (2016) On the solution of stochastic optimization and variational problems in imperfect information regimes. SIAM J. Optim. 26(4):2394-2429.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1356.90097 · doi:10.1137/140955495
[13] Juditsky A , Nemirovski A (2012) First-order methods for nonsmooth convex large-scale optimization. I. General purpose methods. Sra S , Nowozin S , Wright S , eds. Optimization for Machine Learning , Neural Information Processing Series (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 121-148.Google Scholar
[14] Mahajan S , van Ryzin G (2001) Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Oper. Res. 49(3):334-351.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1163.90339
[15] Mišić VV (2016) Data, models and decisions for large-scale stochastic optimization. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
[16] Nesterov Y (2018) Complexity bounds for primal-dual methods minimizing the model of objective function. Math. Programming 171(1):311-330.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1397.90351 · doi:10.1007/s10107-017-1188-6
[17] Rusmevichientong P , Roy BV , Glynn P (2006) A nonparametric approach to multiproduct pricing. Oper. Res. 54(1):82-98.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1167.90494
[18] Sion M (1958) On general minimax theorems. Pacific J. Math. 8(1):171-176.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 0081.11502 · doi:10.2140/pjm.1958.8.171
[19] Talluri K , van Ryzin G (2005) The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management , International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 68 (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1007/b139000
[20] van Ryzin G , Vulcano G (2015) A market discovery algorithm to estimate a general class of nonparametric choice models. Management Sci. 61(2):281-300.Link, Google Scholar
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.