×

Thermal problem solution using a surrogate model clustering technique. (English) Zbl 1158.80327

Summary: The thermal problem defined for the validation challenge workshop involves a simple one-dimensional slab geometry with a defined heat flux at the front face, adiabatic conditions at the rear face, and a provided baseline predictive simulation model to be used to simulate the time-dependent heatup of the slab. This paper will discuss a clustering methodology using a surrogate heat transfer algorithm that allows propagation of the uncertainties in the model parameters using a very limited series of full simulations. This clustering methodology can be used when the predictive model to be run is very expensive, and only a few simulation runs are possible. A series of time-dependent statistical comparisons designed to validate the model against experimental data provided in the problem formulation will also be presented, and limitations of the approach discussed. The purpose of this paper is to represent methods of propagation of uncertainty with limited computer runs, validation with uncertain data, and decision-making under uncertainty. The final results of the analysis indicate that the there is approximately 95% confidence that the regulatory criteria under consideration would be failed given the high level of physical data provided.

MSC:

80M25 Other numerical methods (thermodynamics) (MSC2010)
68T37 Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence
62P99 Applications of statistics

Software:

SPSS
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Dowding, K. J.; Pilch, M.; Hills, R. G., Formulation of the thermal problem, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 197, 29-32, 2385-2389 (2008) · Zbl 1138.74020
[2] Paté-Cornell, E., Risk and uncertainty analysis in government safety decisions, Risk Analysis, 22, 3, 633-646 (2002)
[3] Helton, J. C.; Davis, F. J., Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 81, 23-69 (2003)
[4] Kaplan, S.; Garrick, J., On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Analysis, 1, 1 (1981)
[5] Iman, R. L.; Helton, J. C., A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, Risk Analysis, 8, 1 (1988)
[6] A. Mosleh et al. (Ed.), Model uncertainty: its characterization and quantification, in: proceedings of workshop I in advanced topics in risk and reliability analysis, sponsored by the nuclear regulatory commission, NUREG/CP-0138, 10 (1993) 20-22.; A. Mosleh et al. (Ed.), Model uncertainty: its characterization and quantification, in: proceedings of workshop I in advanced topics in risk and reliability analysis, sponsored by the nuclear regulatory commission, NUREG/CP-0138, 10 (1993) 20-22.
[7] Office of nuclear regulatory research (ONRR), PRA Procedures Guide, NUREG/CR-2300, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1983.; Office of nuclear regulatory research (ONRR), PRA Procedures Guide, NUREG/CR-2300, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1983.
[8] US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five US Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-1150, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC, December 1990.; US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five US Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-1150, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC, December 1990.
[9] M.D. Brandyberry, D.P. Kearnaghan, J.M. East, PSA Uncertainties Introduced by Use of the PARTITION Computer Code for Source Term Clustering, in: Proceedings of Probabilistic Safety Assessment International Topical Meeting, Clearwater Beach, FL, January 26-29, 1993, 383-388.; M.D. Brandyberry, D.P. Kearnaghan, J.M. East, PSA Uncertainties Introduced by Use of the PARTITION Computer Code for Source Term Clustering, in: Proceedings of Probabilistic Safety Assessment International Topical Meeting, Clearwater Beach, FL, January 26-29, 1993, 383-388.
[10] US Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Quantitative Risk Assessment, Science Applications International Corporation, SAIC-96/2600, December, 1996.; US Army Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Quantitative Risk Assessment, Science Applications International Corporation, SAIC-96/2600, December, 1996.
[11] SPSS for Windows, Release 14.0.0, 2005, SPSS Inc: Chicago.; SPSS for Windows, Release 14.0.0, 2005, SPSS Inc: Chicago.
[12] SamplePower 2.0, developed by Michael Borenstein, December 20, 2000, distributed by SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.; SamplePower 2.0, developed by Michael Borenstein, December 20, 2000, distributed by SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
[13] Ghanem, R. G.; Spanos, P. D., Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach (1991), Dover publications · Zbl 0953.74608
[14] B. Ganapathysubramanian, N. Zabaras, Sparse Grid Collocation Methods for Stochastic Natural Convection Problems, Journal of Computational Physics, in press.; B. Ganapathysubramanian, N. Zabaras, Sparse Grid Collocation Methods for Stochastic Natural Convection Problems, Journal of Computational Physics, in press. · Zbl 1343.76059
[15] R.L. Iman et al., PARTITION: A Program for Defining the Source Term/Consequence Analysis Interface in the NUREG-1150 Probabilistic Risk Assessments, Sandia National Laboratories, NUREG/CR-5253, SAND88-2940, May 1990.; R.L. Iman et al., PARTITION: A Program for Defining the Source Term/Consequence Analysis Interface in the NUREG-1150 Probabilistic Risk Assessments, Sandia National Laboratories, NUREG/CR-5253, SAND88-2940, May 1990.
[16] Incropera, F. P.; DeWitt, D. P., Fundamentals of Heat Transfer (1981), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons New York
[17] M.D. Brandyberry, M.D., Uncertainty Quantification in 3D Rocket Simulation, AIAA-2006-4586, in: presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics JPC Meeting, July 2006.; M.D. Brandyberry, M.D., Uncertainty Quantification in 3D Rocket Simulation, AIAA-2006-4586, in: presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics JPC Meeting, July 2006.
[18] M.D. Brandyberry, E. Egejuru, Uncertainty Quantification for Multiphysics Solid Rocket Motor Simulations, in: 54th JANNAF Propulsion Meeting, Denver, CO, May 14-18, 2007.; M.D. Brandyberry, E. Egejuru, Uncertainty Quantification for Multiphysics Solid Rocket Motor Simulations, in: 54th JANNAF Propulsion Meeting, Denver, CO, May 14-18, 2007.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.