×

A new integrated likelihood for estimating population size in dependent dual-record system. (English. French summary) Zbl 1492.62053

Summary: Efficient estimation of the population size from dependent dual-record system (DRS) remains a statistical challenge in the capture-recapture type experiment. Owing to the non-identifiability of the suitable time-behavioural response variation model (denoted as \(M_{tb})\) under DRS, few methods are developed in the Bayesian paradigm based on informative priors. Our contribution in this article is to develop a new integrated likelihood function from model \(M_{tb}\) motivated by a novel approach developed by T. A. Severini [Biometrika 94, No. 3, 529–542 (2007; Zbl 1134.62011)]. A suitable weight function on the nuisance parameter is derived with the knowledge of the direction of behavioural dependency. A pseudo-likelihood function is constructed so that the resulting estimator possess some desirable properties including negligible prior (or weight) sensitiveness. Extensive simulations show the superior performance of our proposed method to that of the existing Bayesian methods. Moreover, the proposed estimator is easy to implement from the computational perspective. Applications to two real data sets are presented.

MSC:

62F10 Point estimation
62D05 Sampling theory, sample surveys
62H99 Multivariate analysis
62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis

Citations:

Zbl 1134.62011

References:

[1] Chandrasekar, C. & Deming, W. E. (1949). On a method of estimating birth and death rates and the extent of registration. Journal of American Statistical Association, 44, 101-115. · Zbl 0033.29402
[2] Chao, A. (1987). Estimating the population size for capture‐recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics, 43, 783-791. · Zbl 0715.62286
[3] Chao, A., Chu, W., & Chiu, H. H. (2000). Capture-recapture when time and behavioral response affect capture probabilities. Biometrics, 56, 427-433. · Zbl 1060.62586
[4] Chatterjee, K. & Mukherjee, D. (2016a). On the estimation of homogeneous population size from a complex dual‐record system. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 86, 3562-3581. · Zbl 07184815
[5] Chatterjee, K. & Mukherjee, D. (2016b). On the identification of the nature of behavioural dependence in two‐sample capture‐recapture study. Technical Report. https://sites.google.com/site/kiranmoychatterjee/.
[6] Chatterjee, K. & Mukherjee, D. (2016c). An improved integrated likelihood population size estimation in dual‐record system. Statistics and Probability Letters, 110, 146-154. · Zbl 1384.62028
[7] Gosky, R. & Ghosh, S. K. (2011). A comparative study of Bayes estimators of closed population size from capture-recapture data. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 5, 241-260. · Zbl 06082943
[8] Jarvis, S. N., Lowe, P. J., Avery, A., Levene, S., & Cormack, R. M. (2000). Children are not goldfish-mark/recapture techniques and their application to injury data. Injury Prevention, 6, 46-50.
[9] Lee, S. M., Hwang, W. H., & Huang, L. H. (2003). Bayes estimation of population size from capture-recapture models with time variation and behavior response. Statistica Sinica, 13, 477-494. · Zbl 1015.62119
[10] Lloyd, C. J. (1994). Efficiency of martingale methods in recapture studies. Biometrika, 81, 305-315. · Zbl 0807.62086
[11] Mukherjee, D. (2014). Survey of looms and work‐sheds in comprehensive handloom development programme in Dakshin Dinajpur district, West Bengal, India. A project report, Sampling and Official Statistics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Commissioned by: Directorate of Textiles, Government of West Bengal, India.
[12] Nour, E. S. (1982). On the estimation of the total number of vital events with data from dual‐record collection systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 145, 106-116. · Zbl 0479.62045
[13] Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62, 1-135. · Zbl 0424.62077
[14] Salasar, L. E. B., Leite, J. G., & Louzada, F. (2014). On the integrated maximum likelihood estimators for a closed population capture-recapture model with unequal capture probabilities. Statistics, 49, 1204-1220. · Zbl 1382.62056
[15] Salasar, L. E. B., Leite, J. G., & Louzada, F. (2016). Likelihood‐based inference for population size in a capture-recapture experiment with varying probabilities from occasion to occasion. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 30, 47-69. · Zbl 1381.62029
[16] Sen, A. R. & Sen, P. K. (1981). Schnabel type estimators for closed populations with multiple markings. Sankhya Series B, 43, 68-80. · Zbl 0517.62013
[17] Severini, T. A. (2000). Likelihood Methods in Statistics. Oxford University Press, New York. · Zbl 0984.62002
[18] Severini, T. A. (2007). Integrated likelihood functions for non‐Bayesian inference. Biometrika, 94, 529-542. · Zbl 1134.62011
[19] Wang, X., He, C. Z., & Sun, D. (2015). Bayesian estimation of population size via capture‐recapture model with time variation and behavioral response. Journal of Ecology, 5, 1-13.
[20] Wolter, K. M. (1986). Some coverage error models for census data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 81, 338-346. · Zbl 0629.62018
[21] Yang, H. C. & Chao, A. (2005). Modeling animals’ behavioral response by Markov chain models for capture-recapture experiments. Biometrics, 61, 1010-1017. · Zbl 1087.62136
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.