×

A fast algorithm for the estimation of statistical error in DNS (or experimental) time averages. (English) Zbl 1380.65027

Summary: Time- and space-averaging of the instantaneous results of DNS (or experimental measurements) represent a standard final step, necessary for the estimation of their means or correlations or other statistical properties. These averages are necessarily performed over a finite time and space window, and are therefore more correctly just estimates of the ‘true’ statistical averages. The choice of the appropriate window size is most often subjectively based on individual experience, but as subtler statistics enter the focus of investigation, an objective criterion becomes desirable. Here a modification of the classical estimator of averaging error of finite time series, i.e., ‘batch means’ algorithm, will be presented, which retains its speed while removing its biasing error. As a side benefit, an automatic determination of batch size is also included. Examples will be given involving both an artificial time series of known statistics and an actual DNS of turbulence.

MSC:

65C60 Computational problems in statistics (MSC2010)
62J10 Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Moin, P.; Mahesh, K., Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 30, 539-578 (1998) · Zbl 1398.76073
[2] Jiménez, J.; Moser, R. D., What are we learning from simulating wall turbulence?, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 365, 1852, 715-732 (2007) · Zbl 1152.76406
[3] Russo, S.; Luchini, P., The linear response of turbulent flow to a volume force: comparison between eddy-viscosity model and DNS, J. Fluid Mech., 790, 104-127 (2016) · Zbl 1382.76144
[4] Cheung, S. H.; Oliver, T. A.; Prudencio, E. E.; Prudhomme, S.; Moser, R. D., Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96, 9, 1137-1149 (2011)
[5] Oliver, T. A.; Moser, R. D., Bayesian uncertainty quantification applied to RANS turbulence models, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 318, 4, Article 042032 pp. (2011)
[6] A. C. on Standards, AIAA guide for verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations, AIAA Paper 98-G-077
[7] Donzis, D. A.; Yeung, P. K.; Sreenivasan, K. R., Dissipation and entropy in isotropic turbulence: resolution effects and scaling in direct numerical simulations, Phys. Fluids, 20, 045108, 1-16 (2008) · Zbl 1182.76213
[8] von Storch, H.; Zwiers, F. W., Statistical Analysis in Climate Research (2001), Cambridge University Press
[9] Hoyas, S.; Jiménez, J., Reynolds number effects on the Reynolds-stress budgets in turbulent channels, Phys. Fluids, 20, 101511, 1-8 (2008) · Zbl 1182.76330
[10] Conway, R. W.; Johnson, B. M.; Maxwell, W. L., Some problems of digital systems simulation, Manag. Sci., 6, 1, 92-110 (1959)
[11] Conway, R. W., Some tactical problems in digital simulation, Manag. Sci., 10, 1, 47-61 (1963)
[12] Schmeiser, B. W., Batch size effects in the analysis of simulation output, Oper. Res., 30, 3, 556-568 (1982) · Zbl 0484.65087
[13] Meketon, M. S.; Schmeiser, B., Overlapping batch means: something for nothing?, (WSC ’84 Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Winter Simulation, vol. 27 (1984)), 226-230
[14] Law, A. M.; Kelton, W. D., Simulation Modeling and Analysis (2000), McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill Boston
[15] Box, G. E.P.; Jenkins, G. M.; Reinsel, G. C.; Ljung, G. M., Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (2015), Wiley, Prentice-Hall
[16] Broersen, P. M.T., Automatic spectral analysis with time series models, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 51, 2, 211-216 (2002)
[17] Oliver, T. A.; Malaya, N.; Ulerich, R.; Moser, R. D., Estimating uncertainties in statistics computed from direct numerical simulation, Phys. Fluids, 26, 3 (2014)
[18] Billingsley, P., Probability and Measure (2012), Wiley · Zbl 1236.60001
[19] Lin, Z.; Lu, C., Limit Theory for Mixing Dependent Random Variables, Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 378 (1996) · Zbl 0889.60001
[20] Wei, W. W.S., Time Series Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate Methods (2005), Pearson
[21] Fishman, G. S., Grouping observations in digital simulation, Manag. Sci., 24, 5, 510-521 (1978) · Zbl 0371.62009
[22] Percival, D. B., Three curious properties of the sample variance and autocovariance for stationary processes with unknown mean, J. Am. Stat., 47, 4, 274-276 (1993)
[23] Broerson, P. M.T., Automatic Autocorrelation and Spectral Analysis (2006), Springer-Verlag
[24] Luchini, P., Immersed-boundary simulations of turbulent flow past a sinusoidally undulated river bottom, Eur. J. Mech. B, Fluids, 55, 340-347 (2015) · Zbl 1408.76337
[25] Law, A. M.; Carson, J. S., A sequential procedure for determining the length of a steady-state simulation, Oper. Res., 27, 5, 1011-1025 (1979) · Zbl 0423.65008
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.