×

Learning dynamics for mechanism design: an experimental comparison of public goods mechanisms. (English) Zbl 1132.91431

Summary: In a repeated-interaction public goods economy, incomplete information and dynamic behavior may affect the realized outcomes of mechanisms known to be efficient in a complete information one-shot game. An experimental test of five public goods mechanisms indicates that subjects with private information appear to best respond to recent observations. This provides predictions about which mechanisms will generate convergence to their efficient equilibrium allocations. These predictions match the experimental result that globally stable efficient mechanisms realize the highest efficiency in practice. The simplicity of the suggested best response model makes it useful in predicting stability of mechanisms not yet tested.

MSC:

91B18 Public goods

Software:

bootstrap

References:

[1] Attiyeh, G.; Franciosi, R.; Isaac, R. M., Experiments with the pivot process for providing public goods, Public Choice, 102, 95-114 (2000)
[2] Auster, R. D., The invariably stable coweb model, Rev. Econ. Stud., 38, 514-529 (1971)
[3] Bear, D. V.T., The matrix multiplier and distributed lags, Econometrica, 31, 514-529 (1963) · Zbl 0118.14707
[4] Bear, D. V.T., Distributed lags and economic theory, Rev. Econ. Stud., 33, 235-243 (1966) · Zbl 0118.14707
[5] Brown, G. W., Iterative solution of games by fictitious play, (Koopmans, T. C., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (1951), Wiley: Wiley New York) · Zbl 0045.09902
[6] Carlson, J. A., The stability of an experimental market with supply-response lag, The Southern Econ. J., 33, 305-321 (1967)
[7] T. Cason, T. Saijo, T. Sjostrom, T. Yamato, Secure implementation experiments: Do strategy-proof mechanisms really work? California Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Working Paper, 2003.; T. Cason, T. Saijo, T. Sjostrom, T. Yamato, Secure implementation experiments: Do strategy-proof mechanisms really work? California Institute of Technology, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Working Paper, 2003. · Zbl 1154.91387
[8] Y. Chen, Dynamic stability of nash-efficient public goods mechanisms: Reconciling theory and experiments, in: R. Zwick, A. Rapoport (Eds.), Experimental Business Research, vol. II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2004, forthcoming.; Y. Chen, Dynamic stability of nash-efficient public goods mechanisms: Reconciling theory and experiments, in: R. Zwick, A. Rapoport (Eds.), Experimental Business Research, vol. II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2004, forthcoming.
[9] Chen, Y., Incentive compatible mechanisms for pure public goods: A survey of experimental research, (Plott, C. R.; Smith, V., The Handbook of Experimental Economics Results (2005), Elsevier Press: Elsevier Press Amsterdam)
[10] Chen, Y.; Gazzale, R., When does learning in games generate convergence to nash equilibria? The role of supermodularity in an experimental setting, Amer. Econ. Rev., 94, 1505-1535 (2004)
[11] Chen, Y.; Plott, C. R., The Groves-Ledyard mechanism: An experimental study of institutional design, J. Public Econ., 59, 335-364 (1996)
[12] Chen, Y.; Tang, F.-F., Learning and incentive-compatible mechanisms for public goods provision: An experimental study, J. Polit. Econ., 106, 633-662 (1998)
[13] Clarke, E., Multipart pricing of public goods, Public Choice, 2, 19-33 (1971)
[14] de Trenqualye, P., Stable implementation of Lindahl allocations, Econ. Lett., 29, 291-294 (1989) · Zbl 1328.91146
[15] Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R., An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993), Chapman & Hall: Chapman & Hall New York · Zbl 0835.62038
[16] Gabay, D.; Moulin, H., On the uniqueness and stability of nash-equilibria in noncooperative games, (Bensoussan, A.; Kleindorfer, P.; Tapiero, C. S., Applied Stochastic Control in Econometrics and Management Science (1980), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam) · Zbl 0461.90085
[17] Groves, T., Incentives in teams, Econometrica, 41, 617-633 (1973) · Zbl 0311.90002
[18] Groves, T.; Ledyard, J. O., Optimal allocation of public goods: A solution to the ‘free-rider’ problem, Econometrica, 45, 783-809 (1977) · Zbl 0363.90015
[19] R. Harriff, D.V.T. Bear, J. Conlisk, Stability and speed of adjustment under retiming of lags, Econometrica 48.; R. Harriff, D.V.T. Bear, J. Conlisk, Stability and speed of adjustment under retiming of lags, Econometrica 48. · Zbl 0436.90027
[20] Isaac, R. M.; McCue, K. F.; Plott, C. R., Public goods provision in an experimental environment, J. Public Econ., 26, 51-74 (1985)
[21] Kawagoe, T.; Mori, T., Can the pivotal mechanism induce truth-telling? An experimental study, Public Choice, 108, 331-354 (2001)
[22] T. Kim, Stability problems in the implementation of Lindahl allocations, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1987.; T. Kim, Stability problems in the implementation of Lindahl allocations, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 1987.
[23] Ledyard, J. O., Public goods: A survey of experimental research, (Kagel, J.; Roth, A., Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ) · Zbl 0229.90006
[24] Milgrom, P.; Roberts, J., Rationalizability learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities, Econometrica, 58, 1255-1277 (1990) · Zbl 0728.90098
[25] Milgrom, P.; Roberts, J., Adaptive and sophisticated learning in normal form games, Games Econ. Behav., 3, 82-100 (1991) · Zbl 0751.90093
[26] Murata, Y., Mathematics for Stability and Optimization of Economic Systems (1977), Academic Press: Academic Press New York
[27] Ortega, J. M.; Rheinboldt, W. C., Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (1970), Academic Press: Academic Press New York · Zbl 0241.65046
[28] Rosen, J. B., Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave \(n\)-person games, Econometrica, 33, 520-533 (1965) · Zbl 0142.17603
[29] Selten, R., Axiomatic characterization of the quadratic scoring rule, Exper. Econ., 1, 43-61 (1998) · Zbl 0919.90003
[30] Shapley, L. S., Some topics in two-person games, (Dresher, M.; Shapley, L. S.; Tucker, A. W., Advances in Game Theory (1964), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton) · Zbl 0126.16204
[31] Smith, V., Incentive compatible experimental processes for the provision of public goods, (Smith, V., Research in Experimental Economics (1979), JAI Press: JAI Press Greenwich, CT)
[32] Topkis, D. M., Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
[33] Vega-Redondo, F., Implementation of Lindahl equilibrium: An integration of static and dynamic approaches, Math. Soc. Sci., 18, 211-228 (1989) · Zbl 0687.90010
[34] Vickrey, W., Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders, J. Finance, 16, 8-37 (1961)
[35] Walker, M., A simple incentive compatible scheme for attaining Lindahl allocations, Econometrica, 49, 65-71 (1981) · Zbl 0446.90009
[36] Zhou, L., The set of nash equilibria of a supermodular game is a complete lattice, Games Econ. Behav., 7, 295-300 (1994) · Zbl 0809.90138
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.