×

Equivalence of strong and coalition-proof Nash equilibria in games without spillovers. (English) Zbl 0872.90123

Summary: This paper examines the conditions which guarantee that the set of coalition-proof Nash equilibria coincides with the set of strong Nash equilibria in the normal form games without spillovers. We find that population monotonicity properties of the payoff functions, when the payoff of a player changes monotonically when the size of the group of players choosing the same strategy increases, are crucial to obtain the equivalence of these two solution concepts. We identify the classes of games, satisfying population monotonicity properties, which yield the equivalence of the set of coalition-proof Nash equilibria and the set of strong Nash equilibria. We also provide sufficient conditions for the equivalence result even when the population monotonicity assumptions are relaxed.

MSC:

91A12 Cooperative games
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aumann, R. J.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Contributions to the theory of games, Vol. IV. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1959 · Zbl 0085.13005
[2] Bernheim, D., Peleg, B., Whinston M.: Coalition-proof Nash equilibria: I concepts. Journal of Economic Theory42, 1-12 (1987) · Zbl 0619.90090 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(87)90099-8
[3] Borm, P., Tijs, S. H.: Strategic claim games corresponding to NTU-games. Games and Economic Behavior4, 58-71 (1992) · Zbl 0777.90088 · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(92)90005-D
[4] Borm, P., Otten, G-J., Peters, H.: Core implementation in modified strong and coalition proof Nash equilibria. Tilburg University Discussion Paper, 1992 · Zbl 0796.90073
[5] Demange, G., Henriet, D.: Sustainable oligopolies. Journal of Economic Theory54, 417-428 (1991) · Zbl 0733.90018 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(91)90132-N
[6] Demange, G.: Intermediate preferences and stable coalition structures. Journal of Mathematical Economics23, 45-58 (1994) · Zbl 0791.90078 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(94)90035-3
[7] Greenberg, J., Weber, S.: Multiparty equilibria under proportional representation. American Political Science Review79, 693-703 (1985) · doi:10.2307/1956838
[8] Greenberg, J., Weber, S.: Strong Tiebout equilibrium under restricted preferences domain. Journal of Economic Theory38, 101-117 (1986) · Zbl 0592.90017 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(86)90090-6
[9] Greenberg, J.: Deriving strong and coalition-proof Nash equilibria from an abstract system. Journal of Economic Theory49, 195-202 (1989) · Zbl 0678.90104 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(89)90075-6
[10] Greenberg, J., Weber, S.: State coalition structures with unidimensional set of alternatives. Journal of Economic Theory60, 62-82 (1993) · Zbl 0797.90126 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1035
[11] Guesnerie, R., Oddou, C.: Second best taxation as a game. Journal of Economic Theory60, 67-91 (1981) · Zbl 0484.90027 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(81)90017-X
[12] Ichiishi, T.: The cooperative nature of the firm. London: Cambridge University Press 1993 · Zbl 0871.90014
[13] Kalai, E., Postlewaite, A., Roberts, J.: A group incentive compatible mechanism yielding core allocations. Journal of Economic Theory20, 13-22 (1979) · Zbl 0402.90011 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90060-7
[14] Kahn, C. M., Mookherjee, D.: The good, the bad and the ugly: coalition proof equilibrium in infinite games. Games and Economic Behavior4, 101-121 (1992) · Zbl 0769.90083 · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(92)90007-F
[15] Kaneko, M., Wooders, M. H.: Cores of partitioning games. Mathematical Social Sciences3, 313-327 (1982) · Zbl 0493.90089 · doi:10.1016/0165-4896(82)90015-4
[16] Konishi, H., Le Breton, M., Weber, S.: Equilibrium in a model with partial rivalry. Forthcoming Journal of Economic Theory 1995a · Zbl 0883.90128
[17] Konishi, H., Le Breton, M., Weber, S.: Pure strategy Nash equilibrium in games with positive externalities. Working Paper, Richard B. Johnson Center for Economic Studies at Southern Methodist University, 1995b · Zbl 0891.90182
[18] Le Breton, M., Owen, G., Weber, S.: Strongly balanced cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory20, 419-427 (1992) · Zbl 0763.90103 · doi:10.1007/BF01271134
[19] Peleg, B.: Game theoretic analysis of voting in committees. London: Cambridge University Press 1984 · Zbl 0563.90002
[20] Scarf, H.: The core of an N-person game. Econometrica35, 50-69 (1967) · Zbl 0183.24003 · doi:10.2307/1909383
[21] Thomson, W.: Population monotonic allocation rules. In: A. Barnett, M. Salles, H. Moulin and N. Schofield (eds.) Social choice, welfare and ethics. London: Cambridge University Press 1994
[22] Wako, J.: Coalition-proofness the competitive allocations in a market with indivisible goods. Gakushuin University Discussion Paper, 1994 · Zbl 1039.91503
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.