×

Acoustic receptivity of Mach 4.5 boundary layer with leading-edge bluntness. (English) Zbl 1161.76560

Summary: Boundary layer receptivity to two-dimensional slow and fast acoustic waves is investigated by solving Navier-Stokes equations for Mach 4.5 flow over a flat plate with a finite-thickness leading edge. Higher order spatial and temporal schemes are employed to obtain the solution whereby the flat-plate leading edge region is resolved by providing a sufficiently refined grid. The results show that the instability waves are generated in the leading edge region and that the boundary-layer is much more receptive to slow acoustic waves (by almost a factor of 20) as compared to the fast waves. Hence, this leading-edge receptivity mechanism is expected to be more relevant in the transition process for high Mach number flows where second mode instability is dominant. Computations are performed to investigate the effect of leading-edge thickness and it is found that bluntness tends to stabilize the boundary layer. Furthermore, the relative significance of fast acoustic waves is enhanced in the presence of bluntness. The effect of acoustic wave incidence angle is also studied and it is found that the receptivity of the boundary layer on the ‘windward’ side (with respect to the acoustic forcing) decreases by more than a factor of four when the incidence angle is increased from \(0^\circ\) to \(45^\circ\). However, the receptivity coefficient for the ‘leeward’ side is found to vary relatively weakly with the incidence angle.

MSC:

76N20 Boundary-layer theory for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
76E09 Stability and instability of nonparallel flows in hydrodynamic stability
76M12 Finite volume methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
76M20 Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics

References:

[1] Goldstein M.E. (1983). The evolution of Tollmien–Schlichting waves near a leading-edge. J. Fluid Mech. 127: 59–81 · Zbl 0524.76046 · doi:10.1017/S002211208300261X
[2] Goldstein M.E. (1987). The generation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by long wavelength free stream disturbances. In: Dwoyer, D.L. and Hussaini, M.Y. (eds) Stability of Time Dependent and Spatially Varying Flows, pp 58–81. Springer, Heidelberg
[3] Kendall J.M. (1975). Wind tunnel experiments relating to supersonic and hypersonic boundary layer transition. AIAA J. 13: 290–299 · doi:10.2514/3.49694
[4] Fisher, D.F., Dougherty, N.S.: In-Flight Transition Measurement on a 10 deg cone at Mach numbers from 0.5 to 2.0. NASA TP-1971 (1982)
[5] Mack L.M. (1975). On the application of linear stability theory and the problem of supersonic boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 13: 423–448 · doi:10.2514/3.49693
[6] Gaponov S.A. (1977). Interaction between a supersonic boundary layer and acoustic disturbances. Fluid Dyn. 12(6): 858–862 · Zbl 0392.76053 · doi:10.1007/BF01090319
[7] Gaponov, S.A., Smorodsky, B.V.: Supersonic boundary layer receptivity to streamwise acoustic field. In: IUTAM Symposium. Spinger, Hidelberg (1999)
[8] Mack, L.M.: Boundary layer stability theory. Report 900–277 Rev. A, Jet Propulsion Lab, Pasadena, CA (1969)
[9] Fedorov A.V. and Khokhlov A.P. (1991). Excitation of unstable modes in a supersonic boundary layer by acoustic waves. Fluid Dyn. 9: 456–467 · Zbl 0825.76247
[10] Fedorov A.V. and Khokhlov A.P. (2001). Prehistory of instability in a hypersonic boundary layer. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 14: 359–375 · Zbl 1046.76016 · doi:10.1007/s001620100038
[11] Fedorov A.V. (2003). Receptivity of a high-speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 491: 101–129 · Zbl 1063.76552 · doi:10.1017/S0022112003005263
[12] Ma Y. and Zhong X. (2003). Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 2. Receptivity to free-stream sound. J. Fluid Mech. 488: 79–121 · Zbl 1063.76545 · doi:10.1017/S0022112003004798
[13] Egorov, I.V., Fedorov, A.V., Soudakov, V.G.: Direct numerical simulation of supersonic boundary-layer receptivity to acoustic disturbances. AIAA Paper 2005–97 (2005)
[14] Malik M.R. (2003). Hypersonic flight transition data analysis using parabolized stability equations with chemistry effects. J. Spacecr. Rockets 40(3): 332–344 · doi:10.2514/2.3968
[15] Shu, C.-W.: Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. NASA/CR-97-206253 and ICASE Report No. 97–6
[16] Atkins, H.L.: High-Order ENO Methods for the Unsteady Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations. AIAA Paper 91–1557 (1991)
[17] Balakumar, P., Zhao, H., Atkins, H.: Stability of Hypersonic Boundary Layers over a Compression Corner. AIAA Paper 2002–2848 (2002)
[18] Malik M.R. (1990). Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability. J. Comput. Phys. 86(2): 376–413 · Zbl 0682.76043 · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(90)90106-B
[19] Malik, M.R., Spall, R.E., Chang, C.-L.: Effect of nose bluntness on boundary layer stability and transition. In: Presented at AIAA 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 8–11, 1990, AIAA Paper No. 90–0112
[20] Ma Y. and Zhong X. (2005). Receptivity of a supersonic boundart layer over a flat plate. Part 3. Effects of different types of free-stream disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 532: 63–109 · Zbl 1125.76360 · doi:10.1017/S0022112005003836
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.