×

On nilpotent commuting varieties and cohomology of Frobenius kernels. (English) Zbl 1353.17007

Let \(\mathfrak{g}\) denote a classical Lie algebra (type \(A\), \(B\), \(C\), or \(D\)) over an algebraically closed field \(k\) of characteristic \(p > 0\). That is, \(\mathfrak{g}\) is either \(\mathfrak{sl}_{n}\), \(\mathfrak{so}_{2n + 1}\), \(\mathfrak{sp}_{2n}\), or \(\mathfrak{so}_{2n}\). Further it is assumed that \(p \neq 2\) in the latter three cases. Associated to \(\mathfrak{g}\) (which is a restricted Lie algebra) is the nilpotent cone \({\mathcal N}\) and the restricted nullcone \({\mathcal N}_1 := \{x \in {\mathfrak g}~ |~ x^{[p]} = 0\} \subset {\mathcal N}\). Note that \({\mathcal N}_1 = {\mathcal N}\) if \(p\) is at least the Coxeter number. Let \(V \subset {\mathfrak g}\) denote a closed subvariety. Given a positive integer \(r\), associated to \(V\) is the commuting variety \(C_r(V) \subset V^r\) consisting of all pairwise commuting \(r\)-tuples of elements in \(V\). Of particular interest in the work under review are the commuting varieties \(C_r({\mathcal N})\) and \(C_r({\mathcal N}_1)\).
In [Invent. Math. 154, No. 3, 653–683 (2003; Zbl 1068.17006)], A. Premet (in greater generality than considered here) gave a precise description of the variety \(C_2({\mathcal N})\), from which one concludes that it is equidimensional. For larger \(r\), much less is known. The author showed in his doctoral thesis that \(C_r({\mathcal N})\) is irreducible (hence equidimensional) for all \(r\) for \(\mathfrak{sl}_2\) or \(\mathfrak{sl}_3\). On the other hand, the author with K. Šivic [Linear Algebra Appl. 452, 237–262 (2014; Zbl 1291.15045)] showed for \(\mathfrak{sl}_n\) that \(C_r({\mathcal N})\) is reducible for \(r, n\) sufficiently large. In the work under review, the author shows for sufficiently large \(r\) (with \({\mathfrak g}\) as above) that the variety \(C_r({\mathcal N})\) is in fact not equidimensional. Explicit bounds on \(r\) are given for each type (approximately \(r > 3\)).
This conclusion is achieved by making a number of explicit computations of dimensions. First, using regular elements, the author identifies an irreducible component of \(C_r({\mathcal N})\) and computes its dimension. Then, using certain matrices that square to zero, the author constructs another closed subvariety of \(C_r({\mathcal N})\) whose dimension is also computable. For sufficiently large \(r\), this latter variety has larger dimension than the first, thus giving the desired conclusion. Further, the latter subvariety is always contained within \(C_r({\mathcal N}_1)\) and so can be used to give a lower bound on the dimension of \(C_r({\mathcal N}_1)\). From this, the author explicitly computes the dimension of \(C_r({\mathcal N}_1)\) in type \(A\) for \(p = 2\) (i.e., \(\mathfrak{sl}_n\) for arbitrary \(n\)) and for rank 2 Lie algebras for \(p > 2\) (i.e., \(\mathfrak{sl}_3\) or \(\mathfrak{sp}_4\)). Throughout this discussion, computations are also made with \(\mathfrak{g}\) replaced by its subalgebra of strictly upper triangular matrices.
Let \(G\) be a simple, simply connected algebraic group with \(\text{Lie}(G) = \mathfrak{g}\) and \(G_r\) denote the \(r\)th Frobenius kernel of \(G\). The spectrum of the even-dimensional part of the cohomology ring \(\text{H}^{\bullet}(G_r,k)\) can be identified with the commuting variety \(C_r({\mathcal N}_1)\). Using in part the preceding work on dimensions of commuting varieties, the author also obtains new information on \(\text{H}^{\bullet}(G_r,k)\). For example, while \(\text{H}^{\bullet}(G_r,k)\) is shown to be Cohen-Macaulay when \(G = \mathrm{SL}_2\), for larger rank groups and sufficiently large \(r\), it cannot be (based on the lack of equidimensionality of the commuting variety). The author also gives bounds on Krull dimensions of cohomology rings and the complexity of certain modules. Computations are also made for the cohomology of Frobenius kernels of a Borel subgroup of \(G\) (and the unipotent radical of a Borel).

MSC:

17B08 Coadjoint orbits; nilpotent varieties
20G10 Cohomology theory for linear algebraic groups
17B50 Modular Lie (super)algebras
17B45 Lie algebras of linear algebraic groups
20G05 Representation theory for linear algebraic groups

References:

[1] Benson, D. J., Commutative algebra in the cohomology of groups, (Trends in Commutative Algebra. Trends in Commutative Algebra, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 51 (2004)) · Zbl 1113.20042
[2] Bendel, C. P.; Nakano, D. K.; Pillen, C., Extensions for Frobenius kernels, J. Algebra, 272, 476-511 (2004) · Zbl 1044.20031
[3] Bendel, C. P.; Nakano, D. K.; Pillen, C., Second cohomology groups for Frobenius kernels and related structures, Adv. Math., 209, 162-197 (2007) · Zbl 1178.20042
[4] Carlson, J.; Lin, Z.; Nakano, D.; Parshall, B., The restricted nullcone, (Contemp. Math., vol. 325 (2003)), 51-75 · Zbl 1059.17013
[5] Collingwood, D. H.; McGovern, W. M., Nilpotent Orbits in Semisimple Lie Algebra (1993), Van Nostrand Reinhold · Zbl 0972.17008
[6] Eisenbud, D., Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry (1995), Springer · Zbl 0819.13001
[7] Evens, L.; Siegel, S. F., Generalized Benson-Carlson duality, J. Algebra, 179, 775-792 (1996) · Zbl 0848.16030
[8] Goodwin, S.; Röhrle, G., On commuting varieties of nilradicals of Borel subalgebras of reductive Lie algebras, preprint · Zbl 1315.17016
[9] Hochster, M., Some applications of the Frobenius in characteristic 0, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 58, 886-912 (1978) · Zbl 0421.14001
[10] Hochster, M.; Roberts, J., Rings of invariants of reductive groups acting on regular rings are Cohen-Macaulay, Adv. Math., 13, 115-175 (1974) · Zbl 0289.14010
[11] Humphreys, J. E., Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Grad. Texts in Math., vol. 9 (1978), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag New York, second printing, revised · Zbl 0447.17001
[12] Jantzen, J. C., Representations of Algebraic Groups, Math. Surveys Monogr., vol. 107 (2003), American Mathematical Society: American Mathematical Society Providence, RI · Zbl 1034.20041
[13] Jantzen, J. C., Nilpotent Orbits in Representation Theory, Progr. Math., vol. 228 (2004), Birkhäuser · Zbl 1169.14319
[14] Kaneda, M.; Shimada, N.; Tezuka, M.; Yagita, N., Cohomology of infinitesimal algebraic groups, Math. Z., 205, 61-95 (1990) · Zbl 0714.20027
[15] Levy, P. D., Varieties of modules for \(Z_2 \times Z_2\), J. Algebra, 318, 933-952 (2007) · Zbl 1139.14037
[16] Malle, G.; Testerman, D., Linear Algebraic Groups and Finite Groups of Lie Type, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., vol. 133 (2011), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1256.20045
[17] Ngo, N. V., Cohomology for Frobenius kernels of \(SL_2\), J. Algebra, 396, 39-60 (2013) · Zbl 1306.20048
[18] Ngo, N. V., Commuting varieties of \(r\)-tuples over Lie algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 218, 1400-1417 (2014) · Zbl 1298.20056
[19] Nakano, D. K.; Parshall, B. J.; Vella, D. C., Support varieties for algebraic groups, J. Reine Angew. Math., 547, 15-49 (2002) · Zbl 1009.17013
[20] Ngo, N. V.; Šivic, K., On varieties of commuting nilpotent matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 452, 237-262 (2014) · Zbl 1291.15045
[21] Pommerening, K., Invariants of unipotent groups—a survey, (Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1278 (1987), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin), 8-17 · Zbl 0637.14009
[22] Premet, A., Nilpotent commuting varieties of reductive Lie algebras, Invent. Math., 154, 653-683 (2003) · Zbl 1068.17006
[23] Suslin, A.; Friedlander, E.; Bendel, C., Infinitesimal 1-parameter subgroups and cohomology, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 10, 693-728 (1997) · Zbl 0960.14023
[24] Suslin, A.; Friedlander, E.; Bendel, C., Support varieties for infinitesimal group scheme, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 10, 729-759 (1997) · Zbl 0960.14024
[25] Sobaje, P., Support varieties for Frobenius kernels of classical groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 216, 2657-2664 (2012) · Zbl 1262.20051
[26] Varieties of nilpotent elements for simple Lie algebras I: good primes, J. Algebra, 280, 719-737 (2004) · Zbl 1063.17007
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.