×

Joint and supremum distributions in the compound binomial model with Markovian environment. (English) Zbl 1249.91061

Summary: We study the compound binomial model in Markovian environment, which was proposed by H. Cossette, H. Landriault and È. Marceau [Scand. Actuar. J. 2003, No. 4, 301–323 (2003; Zbl 1092.91040)]. We obtain a recursive formula of the joint distribution of \(T\), \(X(T-1)\) and \(|X(T)|\) (i.e., the time of ruin, the surplus before ruin and the deficit at ruin) by the method of mass function of up-crossing zero points, as given by G. Liu and J. Zhao [Insur. Math. Econ. 40, No. 1, 95–103 (2007; Zbl 1107.60303)]. By using the same method, an recursive formula for the supremum distribution is obtained. An example is included to illustrate the results of the model.

MSC:

91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
62P05 Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] A Asmussen. Risk theory in a Markovian environment, Scand Actuar J, 1989, 69–100. · Zbl 0684.62073
[2] H Cossette, D Landriault, E Marceau. Ruin probabilities in the compound Markov binomial risk model, Scand Actuar J, 2003, 301–323. · Zbl 1092.91040
[3] H Cossette, D Landriault, E Marceau. Compound binomial risk model in a Markovian environment, Insurance Math Econom, 2004, 35: 425–443. · Zbl 1079.91049 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.07.009
[4] H U Gerber. Mathematical fun with compound binomial process, Astin Bull, 1988, 161–168.
[5] H U Gerber, E S W Shiu. The joint distribution of the time of ruin, the surplus immediately before ruin, and the deficit at ruin, Insurance Math Econom, 1997, 21: 129–137. · Zbl 0894.90047 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6687(97)00027-9
[6] G X Liu, J Y Zhao. Joint distributions of some actuarial random vectors in the compound binomial model, Insurance Math Econom, 2007, 40: 95–103. · Zbl 1107.60303 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.03.001
[7] S Li, Y Lu. Moments of the dividend payments and related problems in a Markov-modulated risk model, North Amer Actuar J, 2007, 11(2): 65–76. · doi:10.1080/10920277.2007.10597448
[8] S Li, Y Lu. The decompositions of the discounted penalty functions and the dividends-penalty identity in a Markov-modulated risk model, Astin Bull, 2008, 38: 53–71. · Zbl 1169.91390 · doi:10.2143/AST.38.1.2030402
[9] S Li, Y Lu. The Markovian regime-switching risk model with a threshould dividend strategy, Insurance Math Econom, 2009, 44: 296–303. · Zbl 1163.91438 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.04.004
[10] Y Lu, Tsai, C L Cary. The expected discounted penalty at ruin for a Markov-modulated risk process by diffusion, North Amer Actuar J, 2007, 11(2): 136–152. · doi:10.1080/10920277.2007.10597456
[11] A C Y Ng, H L Yang. On the joint distribution of surplus before and after ruin under a Markovian regime swithing model, Stochastic Process Appl, 2006, 116: 244–266. · Zbl 1093.60051 · doi:10.1016/j.spa.2005.09.008
[12] E S W Shiu. The probability of eventual ruin in a compound binomial model, Astin Bull, 1987, 19: 179–190. · doi:10.2143/AST.19.2.2014907
[13] L Wei, R Wu. The joint distribution of several important actuarial diagnostics in the classical risk model, Insurance Math Econom, 2002, 30: 451–462. · Zbl 1071.91027 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6687(02)00103-8
[14] G E Willmot. Ruin probabilities in the compound binomial model, Insurance Math Econom, 1993, 12: 133–142. · Zbl 0778.62099 · doi:10.1016/0167-6687(93)90823-8
[15] R Wu, G J Wang, L Wei. Joint distributions of some actuarial random vectors containing the time of ruin, Insurance Math Econom, 2003, 33: 147–161. · Zbl 1024.62045 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6687(03)00150-1
[16] H Yang, Z M Zhang, C M Lan. Ruin problems in a discrete Markov risk model, Statist Probab Lett, 2009, 79: 21–28. · Zbl 1153.62084 · doi:10.1016/j.spl.2008.07.009
[17] K C Yuen, J Guo. Some results on the compound Markov binomial model, Scand Actuar J, 2006, 129–140. · Zbl 1144.91036
[18] J Zhu, H Yang. Ruin theory for a Markov regime-switching risk model under a threshould dividend strategy, Insurance Math Econom, 2008, 42: 311–318. · Zbl 1141.91558 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.03.004
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.