×

On the diophantine equation \(x^{10}{\pm{}}y^{10}=z^ 2\). (English) Zbl 0779.11018

A new elementary proof, mainly based on congruences, is given to show that the equations \(x^{10} \pm y^{10} = z^ 2\) in integers \(x\), \(y\) and \(z\) have no nontrivial solutions.

MSC:

11D41 Higher degree equations; Fermat’s equation
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Carmichael, R. D., Diophantine Analysis (1915), Wiley: Wiley New York · JFM 45.0283.11
[2] Desboves, A., Nouv. Ann. Math., 18, 2, 440 (1879)
[3] Dickson, L. E., History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol. II: Diophantine Analysis (1952), Chelsea, New York
[4] Kapferer, H., Archiv. Math. Phys., 3, 21, 143-146 (1913) · JFM 44.0232.01
[5] Kausler, C. F., Nova Acta Acad. Sc. Petrop., 15, 146-155 (1806), ad annos
[6] Lebesgue, V. A., J. de Math., 5, 184-185 (1840)
[7] Lebesgue, V. A., J. de Math., 8, 49-70 (1843)
[8] Mordell, L. J., Diophantine Equations (1969), Academic Press: Academic Press London · Zbl 0188.34503
[9] Sierpinski, W., Elementary Theory of Numbers (1964), PWN: PWN Warsaw · Zbl 0638.10001
[10] Smith, S. T., Fermat’s last theorem and Bezout’s theorem in GCD domains, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 79, 1, 63-85 (1992), (this issue). · Zbl 0770.13014
[11] Tanner, J. W.; Wagstaff, S. S., Math. Comp., 48, 341-350 (1987) · Zbl 0613.10012
[12] Wilmers, G., Bounded existential induction, J. Symbolic Logic, 50, 1, 72-90 (1985) · Zbl 0634.03029
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.