×

The asymptotic performance ratio of an on-line algorithm for uniform parallel machine scheduling with release dates. (English) Zbl 1134.90382

Summary: Jobs arriving over time must be non-preemptively processed on one of \(m\) parallel machines, each running at its own speed, so as to minimize a weighted sum of the job completion times. In this on-line environment, the processing requirement and weight of a job are not known before the job arrives. The Weighted Shortest Processing Requirement (WSPR) heuristic is a simple extension of the well known WSPT heuristic, which is optimal for the single machine problem without release dates. According to WSPR, whenever a machine completes a job, the next job assigned to it is the one with the least ratio of processing requirement to weight among all jobs available for processing at this point in time. We analyze the performance of this heuristic and prove that its asymptotic competitive ratio is one for all instances with bounded job processing requirements and weights. This implies that the WSPR algorithm generates a solution whose relative error approaches zero as the number of jobs increases. Our proof does not require any probabilistic assumption on the job parameters and relies extensively on properties of optimal solutions to a single machine relaxation of the problem.

MSC:

90B35 Deterministic scheduling theory in operations research
90C59 Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bertsimas, D., Gamarnik, D., Sethruaman, J.: From Fluid Relaxations to Practical Algorithms for High-Multiplicity Job-Shop Scheduling: The Holding Cost Objective. Operations Research 51 (5), 798–813 (2003) · Zbl 1165.90449 · doi:10.1287/opre.51.5.798.16748
[2] Chakrabarti, S., Phillips, C., Schulz, A.S., Shmoys, D.B., Stein, C., Wein, J.: Improved Scheduling Algorithms for Minsum Criteria. In: Meyer auf der Heide, F., Monien, B. (eds), Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1099, Springer, Berlin, 646–657 (1996) · Zbl 1046.68505
[3] Chekuri, C., Motwani, R., Natarajan, B., Stein, C.: Approximation Techniques for Average Completion Time Scheduling. SIAM Journal on Computing 31, 146–166 (2001) · Zbl 0992.68066 · doi:10.1137/S0097539797327180
[4] Eastman, W.L., Even, S., Isaacs, I.M.: Bounds for the Optimal Scheduling of n Jobs on m Processors. Management Science 11, 268–279 (1964) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.11.2.268
[5] Goemans, M. X.: A Supermodular Relaxation for Scheduling with Release Dates. In: Cunningham, W.H., McCormick, S.T., Queyranne, M. (eds), Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Proceedings of the 5th International IPCO Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1084, Springer, Berlin, 288–300 (1996)
[6] Goemans, M. X.: Improved Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling with Release Dates. Proceedings of the 8th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 591–598 (1997) · Zbl 1321.68502
[7] Goemans, M. X., Queyranne, M., Schulz, A. S., Skutella, M., Wang, Y.: Single Machine Scheduling with Release Dates. SIAM J. Discrete Mathematics 15, 165–192 (2002) · Zbl 1009.90096 · doi:10.1137/S089548019936223X
[8] Graham, R.L., Lawler, E.L., Lenstra J.K., Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G.: Optimization and Approximation in Deterministic Sequencing and Scheduling: a Survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 5, 287–326 (1979) · Zbl 0411.90044 · doi:10.1016/S0167-5060(08)70356-X
[9] Hall, L. A., Schulz, A. S., Shmoys, D. B., Wein, J.: Scheduling to Minimize Average Completion Time: Off-Line and On-Line Approximation Algorithms. Mathematics of Operations Research 22 (3), 513–544 (1997) · Zbl 0883.90064 · doi:10.1287/moor.22.3.513
[10] Hoogeveen, J. A., Vestjens, A. P. A.: Optimal On-line Algorithms for Single-Machine Scheduling. In: Cunningham, W.H., McCormick, S.T., Queyranne, M. (eds), Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Proceedings of the 5th International IPCO Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1084, Springer, Berlin, 404–414 (1996)
[11] Kaminsky, P., Simchi-Levi, D.: Probabilistic Analysis of an On-line Algorithm for the Single Machine Mean Completion Time Problem With Release Dates. Operations Research Letters 21, 141–148 (2001) · Zbl 1018.90015 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6377(01)00099-2
[12] Labetoulle, J., Lawler, E. L., Lenstra, J. K., Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G.: Preemptive Scheduling of Uniform Machines Subject to Release Dates. In: Pulleyblank, W. R. (ed), Progress in Combinatorial Optimization, Academic Press, New York, 245–261 (1984) · Zbl 0554.90059
[13] Lawler, E. L., Lenstra, J. K., Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., Shmoys, D. B.: Sequencing and Scheduling: Algorithms and Complexity. In: S. C. Graves, A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan and P. H. Zipkin (eds.), Logistics of Production and Inventory, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 4, North–Holland, Amsterdam (1993)
[14] Lenstra, J. K., Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., Brucker, P.: Complexity of Machine Scheduling Problems. Annals of Discrete Math 1, 343–362 (1977) · Zbl 0353.68067 · doi:10.1016/S0167-5060(08)70743-X
[15] Phillips, C., Stein, C., Wein, J.: Minimizing Average Completion Time in the Presence of Release Dates. Mathematical Programming 82, 199–223 (1998) · Zbl 0920.90074
[16] Queyranne, M., Sviridenko, M.: Approximation Algorithms for Shop Scheduling Problems with Minsum Objective. Journal of Scheduling 5, 287–305 (2002) · Zbl 1009.90046 · doi:10.1002/jos.96
[17] Schrage, L.: A Proof of the Optimality of The Shortest Remaining Processing Time Discipline. Operations Research 16, 687–690 (1968) · Zbl 0237.60039 · doi:10.1287/opre.16.3.687
[18] Schulz, A.S., Skutella, M.: Scheduling – LPs Bear Probabilities: Randomized Approximations for Min – Sum Criteria. In: Burkard, R., Woeginger, G. (eds), Algorithms – ESA’97 Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1284, Springer, Berlin, 416–429 (1997)
[19] Sgall, J.: On-line Scheduling — a Survey. In: Fiat, A., Woeginger, G.J. (eds), Online Algorithms: The State of the Art, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1442, Springer, Berlin, 196–231 (1998)
[20] Shmoys, D.B., Wein, J., Williamson, D.P.: Scheduling Parallel Machines On-line. SIAM Journal on Computing 24, 1313–1331 (1995) · Zbl 0845.68042 · doi:10.1137/S0097539793248317
[21] Smith, W.: Various Optimizers for Single-Stage Production. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 3, 59–66 (1956) · doi:10.1002/nav.3800030106
[22] Stougie, L.: Personal communication. quoted in [10] (1995)
[23] Stougie, L., Vestjens, A.P.A.: Randomized Algorithms for On-line Scheduling Problems: How Low Can’t You Go? Operations Research Letters 30 (2), 89–96 (2002) · Zbl 1030.90041
[24] Uma, R. N., Wein, J.: On the Relationship between Combinatorial and LP-Based Approaches to NP-hard Scheduling Problems. In: Bixby, R. E., Boyd, E. A., Rios-Mercado, R. Z. (eds), Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. Proceedings of the Sixth International IPCO Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1412, Springer, Berlin, 394–408 (1998) · Zbl 0910.90179
[25] Vestjens, A.P.A.: On-line Machine Scheduling. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Tecnology, The Netherlands (1997) · Zbl 0909.90183
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.