×

The cricket and the ant: organizational trade-offs in changing environments. (English) Zbl 1160.91401

Summary: Organizations face trade-offs when they adopt strategies in changing resource environments. The type of trade-off depends on the type of resource change. This paper offers an organizational trade-off model for quantitative resource changes. We call it the ”Cricket and Ant” (CA) model, because the pertaining strategies resemble the cricket and ant’s behavior in La Fontaine’s famous fable. We derive theorems in this CA model in First Order Logic, which we also use to demonstrate that two theory fragments of organizational ecology, i.e., niche width theory and propagation strategy theory, obtain as variant cases of CA; their predictions on environmental selection preferences derive as theorems once their respective boundary conditions are represented in the formal machinery.

MSC:

91D10 Models of societies, social and urban evolution

References:

[1] Barwise J., The Language of First-Order Logic (1990)
[2] Brittain J., Organizational Life Cycles pp 291– (1980)
[3] DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990201 · Zbl 0888.92045 · doi:10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990201
[4] DOI: 10.1111/1467-9531.00115 · doi:10.1111/1467-9531.00115
[5] DOI: 10.1023/A:1009633318912 · doi:10.1023/A:1009633318912
[6] Carroll G. R., The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000)
[7] DOI: 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24002-2 · doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24002-2
[8] Downs A., An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957)
[9] DOI: 10.1086/227797 · doi:10.1086/227797
[10] Gamut L. T. F., Logic, Language and Meaning (1991) · Zbl 1391.03004
[11] DOI: 10.1086/226424 · doi:10.1086/226424
[12] DOI: 10.2307/2095567 · doi:10.2307/2095567
[13] Hannan M. T., Organizational Ecology (1989)
[14] DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00192.x · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00192.x
[15] DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00090-5 · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00090-5
[16] DOI: 10.2307/1914185 · Zbl 0411.90012 · doi:10.2307/1914185
[17] DOI: 10.1086/210223 · doi:10.1086/210223
[18] Krackhardt D., Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16 pp 183– (1999)
[19] Kyburg H. E., Philosophy of Science. A Formal Approach (1968) · Zbl 0172.29301
[20] DOI: 10.1086/259131 · doi:10.1086/259131
[21] La Fontaine J. de., La cigale et la fourmi (1966)
[22] Levins R., Evolution in Changing Environments (1968)
[23] Lotka A. J., Elements of Mathematical Biology (1925) · JFM 51.0416.06
[24] DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.6.661.10083 · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.6.661.10083
[25] DOI: 10.1093/icc/13.1.263 · doi:10.1093/icc/13.1.263
[26] Nelson R. R., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982)
[27] Peirce C. S., Popular Science Monthly 12 pp 286– (1878)
[28] DOI: 10.1111/1467-9531.271018 · doi:10.1111/1467-9531.271018
[29] DOI: 10.2307/2095932 · doi:10.2307/2095932
[30] DOI: 10.1287/orsc.8.3.310 · doi:10.1287/orsc.8.3.310
[31] DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00095 · doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00095
[32] DOI: 10.1093/icc/11.1.85 · doi:10.1093/icc/11.1.85
[33] Soskice D., Competing Capitalisms: Institutions and Economies (1999)
[34] DOI: 10.1007/BF00122574 · Zbl 0775.90106 · doi:10.1007/BF00122574
[35] Vermeulen I., Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 7 pp 87– (2001) · doi:10.1023/A:1011300920816
[36] Whitley R., Competing Capitalisms: Institutions and Economies (2002)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.