×

Portfolio instability and socially responsible investment: experiments with financial professionals and students. (English) Zbl 1531.91237

Summary: Efficiency of SRI portfolios is commonly assessed based on an inconclusive risk-return ratio. We propose to approach the efficiency of portfolios with the notion of instability. Unstable portfolios are characterized by higher transaction costs and human resources costs that justify search for more stable portfolios. We examine the instability of SRI portfolios from the perspective of behavioral finance. Based on data from incentivized experiments with 153 financial professionals and 233 students, we compare a baseline treatment to a ranking treatment in which participants received feedback regarding their average investment in SRI assets. We found that SRI portfolios had significantly lower instability: portfolios with a majority of SRI shares exhibited less instability in both treatments compared to conventional portfolios. Moreover, in the ranking treatment subjects invested more in SRI assets than in the baseline. In addition, the experiment revealed the convergence of professionals’ and students’ behavioral patterns.

MSC:

91G10 Portfolio theory
91-05 Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance

Software:

oTree
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abeler, J.; Nosenzo, D., Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives, Experimental Economics, 18, 195-214 (2015)
[2] Albuquerque, R.; Koskinen, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, C., Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous covid-19 market crash, The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9, 3, 593-621 (2020)
[3] Albuquerque, R.; Koskinen, Y.; Zhang, C., Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence, Management Science, 65, 10, 4451-4469 (2019)
[4] Alevy, J. E.; Haigh, M. S.; List, J. A., Information cascades: Evidence from a field experiment with financial market professionals, The Journal of Finance, 62, 1, 151-180 (2007)
[5] Andreoni, J., Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence, Journal of political Economy, 97, 6, 1447-1458 (1989)
[6] Andreoni, J., Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving, The economic journal, 100, 401, 464-477 (1990)
[7] Andreoni, J., Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1, 1-21 (1995) · Zbl 0827.90036
[8] Andreoni, J.; Miller, J., Giving according to garp: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism, Econometrica, 70, 2, 737-753 (2002) · Zbl 1184.91083
[9] Ang, W. R., Sustainable investment in korea does not catch a cold when the united states sneezes, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5, 1-2, 16-26 (2015)
[10] Bailey, W.; Kumar, A.; Ng, D., Behavioral biases of mutual fund investors, Journal of Financial Economics, 102, 1, 1-27 (2011)
[11] Ballestero, E.; Bravo, M.; Pérez-Gladish, B.; Arenas-Parra, M.; Pla-Santamaria, D., Socially responsible investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives, European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 2, 487-494 (2012)
[12] Bartling, B.; Valero, V.; Weber, R. A., Is social responsibility a normal good?, CESifo Working Paper No. 7263. (2018)
[13] Bartling, B.; Weber, R. A.; Yao, L., Do markets erode social responsibility?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 1, 219-266 (2015)
[14] Belot, M.; Duch, R.; Miller, L., A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 113, 26-33 (2015)
[15] Bénabou, R.; Tirole, J., Incentives and prosocial behavior, American economic review, 96, 5, 1652-1678 (2006)
[16] Bénabou, R.; Tirole, J., Individual and corporate social responsibility, Economica, 77, 305, 1-19 (2010)
[17] Bénabou, R.; Tirole, J., Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 2, 805-855 (2011) · Zbl 1219.91050
[18] Bollen, N. P., Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42, 3, 683-708 (2007)
[19] Bolton, G. E.; Ockenfels, A.; Stauf, J., Social responsibility promotes conservative risk behavior, European Economic Review, 74, 109-127 (2015)
[20] Bottasso, A.; Duchêne, S.; Guerci, E.; Hanaki, N.; Noussair, C. N., Higher order risk attitudes of financial experts, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 34, 100658 (2022)
[21] Brodback, D.; Guenster, N.; Mezger, D., Altruism and egoism in investment decisions, Review of Financial Economics, 37, 1, 118-148 (2019)
[22] Burger, E.; Grba, F.; Heidorn, T., The impact of esg ratings on implied and historical volatility, Frankfurt School-Working Paper Series (2022)
[23] Buso, I. M.; Di Cagno, D.; Ferrari, L.; Larocca, V.; Lorè, L.; Marazzi, F.; Panaccione, L.; Spadoni, L., Lab-like findings from online experiments, Journal of the Economic Science Association, 7, 2, 184-193 (2021)
[24] Cadsby, C. B.; Song, F.; Engle-Warnick, J.; Fang, T., Invoking social comparison to improve performance by ranking employees: The moderating effects of public ranking, rank pay, and individual risk attitude, Journal of Economic Psychology, 72, 64-79 (2019)
[25] Calvo, C.; Ivorra, C.; Liern, V., Finding socially responsible portfolios close to conventional ones, International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 52-63 (2015)
[26] Charness, G.; Gneezy, U.; Halladay, B., Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 141-150 (2016)
[27] Charness, G.; Rabin, M., Understanding social preferences with simple tests, The quarterly journal of economics, 117, 3, 817-869 (2002) · Zbl 1032.91710
[28] Chen; Schonger, M.; Wickens, C., otree-an open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88-97 (2016)
[29] Chen, C., 2018. Socially responsible investing: Risk and return. Accessed 17 April 2023 https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/socially-responsible-investing-risk-and-return-2018-01-05.
[30] Chen, S.-H.; Tsai, C.-H., Investment preference, risk perception, and portfolio choices under different socio-economic status: Some experimental evidences from individual investors, SSRN Electronic Journal, 1787842 (2011)
[31] Chew, S. H.; Li, K. K., The moral investor: Sin stock aversion and virtue stock affinity, Available at SSRN 3773971 (2021)
[32] Clot, S.; Grolleau, G.; Ibanez, L., Shall we pay all? an experimental test of random incentivized systems, Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 73, 93-98 (2018)
[33] Cohn, A.; Engelmann, J.; Fehr, E.; Maréchal, M. A., Evidence for countercyclical risk aversion: An experiment with financial professionals, American Economic Review, 105, 2, 860-885 (2015)
[34] Cohn, A.; Fehr, E.; Maréchal, M. A., Do professional norms in the banking industry favor risk-taking?, The Review of Financial Studies, 30, 11, 3801-3823 (2017)
[35] Cohn, A.; Fehr, E.; Maréchal, M., Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry, Nature, 516 (2014)
[36] Consolandi, C.; Innocenti, A.; Vercelli, A., Csr, rationality and the ethical preferences of investors in a laboratory experiment, Research in Economics, 63, 4, 242-252 (2009)
[37] Crosetto, P.; Filippin, A., The “bomb” risk elicitation task, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47, 1, 31-65 (2013)
[38] Døskeland, T.; Pedersen, L. J.T., Investing with brain or heart? a field experiment on responsible investment, Management Science, 62, 6, 1632-1644 (2016)
[39] https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03883121/document
[40] Dunlap, R. E.; Van Liere, K. D.; Mertig, A. G.; Jones, R. E., New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised nep scale, Journal of social issues, 56, 3, 425-442 (2000)
[41] Eckel, C. C.; Herberich, D. H.; Meer, J., A field experiment on directed giving at a public university, Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 66, 66-71 (2017)
[42] Engel, C., Dictator games: A meta study, Experimental economics, 14, 583-610 (2011)
[43] Engelhardt, N.; Ekkenga, J.; Posch, P., Esg ratings and stock performance during the covid-19 crisis, Sustainability, 13, 13, 7133 (2021)
[44] Erragragui, E.; Hassan, M. K.; Peillex, J.; Khan, A. N.F., Does ethics improve stock market resilience in times of instability?, Economic Systems, 42, 3, 450-469 (2018)
[45] Exadaktylos, F.; Espín, A. M.; Branas-Garza, P., Experimental subjects are not different, Scientific reports, 3, 1, 1213 (2013)
[46] Festinger, L., A theory of social comparison processes, Human relations, 7, 2, 117-140 (1954)
[47] Gasser, S. M.; Rammerstorfer, M.; Weinmayer, K., Markowitz revisited: Social portfolio engineering, European Journal of Operational Research, 258, 3, 1181-1190 (2017) · Zbl 1395.91404
[48] Geczy, C. C.; Stambaugh, R. F.; Levin, D., Investing in socially responsible mutual funds, The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 11, 2, 309-351 (2021)
[49] Gerlach, P., The games economists play: Why economics students behave more selfishly than other students, PloS one, 12, 9, e0183814 (2017)
[50] Green, D.; Roth, B., The allocation of socially responsible capital, Available at SSRN 3737772 (2021)
[51] Guenster, N.; Brodback, D.; Pouget, S.; Wang, R., The valuation of corporate social responsibility: A willingness to pay experiment, Proceedings of the EUROFIDAI-ESSEC Paris December Finance Meeting 2022, Available at SSRN 4260824 (2022)
[52] Heeb, F.; Kölbel, J. F.; Paetzold, F.; Zeisberger, S., Do investors care about impact?, Forthcoming in The Review of Financial Studies. Available at SSRN 3765659 (2022)
[53] Hong, H.; Kacperczyk, M., The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets, Journal of financial economics, 93, 1, 15-36 (2009)
[54] Jedynak, T., Is it worth being good?-the efficiency and risk of socially responsible investing in light of various empirical studies, e-Finanse, 13, 3, 1-14 (2017)
[55] Kanuri, S., Risk and return characteristics of environmental, social, and governance (esg) equity etfs, The Journal of Index Investing, 11, 2, 66-75 (2020)
[56] Kaut, M.; Vladimirou, H.; Wallace, S. W.; Zenios, S. A., Stability analysis of portfolio management with conditional value-at-risk, Quantitative Finance, 7, 4, 397-409 (2007) · Zbl 1190.91137
[57] Kirchler, M.; Huber, J.; Stefan, M.; Sutter, M., Market design and moral behavior, Management Science, 62, 9, 2615-2625 (2016)
[58] Kirchler, M.; Lindner, F.; Weitzel, U., Rankings and risk-taking in the finance industry, The Journal of Finance, 73, 5, 2271-2302 (2018)
[59] Koppel, H.; Regner, T., Corporate social responsibility in the work place: Experimental evidence from a gift-exchange game, Experimental Economics, 17, 347-370 (2014)
[60] Kourtis, A., A stability approach to mean-variance optimization, Financial Review, 50, 3, 301-330 (2015)
[61] KPMG, 2019. European responsible investing fund market 2019. Accessed 17 April 2023.
[62] Kritzman, M.; Turkington, D., Stability-adjusted portfolios, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 42, 5, 113-122 (2016)
[63] Kumar, N. C.A.; Smith, C.; Badis, L.; Wang, N.; Ambrosy, P.; Tavares, R., Esg factors and risk-adjusted performance: a new quantitative model, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6, 4, 292-300 (2016)
[64] Lake, R.; Oulton, W., Taking the long view-a toolkit for long-term, sustainable investment mandates, University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL) (2016)
[65] Lean, H. H.; Ang, W. R.; Smyth, R., Performance and performance persistence of socially responsible investment funds in europe and north america, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 254-266 (2015)
[66] Lins, K. V.; Servaes, H.; Tamayo, A., Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis, The Journal of Finance, 72, 4, 1785-1824 (2017)
[67] Liu, Z.; Ma, Q., Portfolio-based ranking of traders for social trading, IEEE Access, 8, 145363-145371 (2020)
[68] March, C.; Ziegelmeyer, A.; Greiner, B.; Cyranek, R., Pay few subjects but pay them well: Cost-effectiveness of random incentive systems, CESifo Working Paper No. 5988 (2016)
[69] Markowitz, H. M., Foundations of portfolio theory, The Journal of Finance, 46, 2, 469-477 (1991)
[70] Martin, R.; Randal, J., How is donation behaviour affected by the donations of others?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67, 1, 228-238 (2008)
[71] Moisson, P.-H., Ethics and impact investment, Toulouse School of Economics Working Paper (2020)
[72] Nakai, M.; Honda, T.; Nishino, N.; Takeuchi, K., An experimental study on motivations for socially responsible investment, Discussion Papers 1314, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University (2013)
[73] Nofsinger, J.; Varma, A., Socially responsible funds and market crises, Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180-193 (2014)
[74] Oikonomou, I.; Platanakis, E.; Sutcliffe, C., Creating more stable and diversified socially responsible investment portfolios, Discussion Paper Number: ICM-2015-03 (2015), Henley, University of Reading, ICMA Centre
[75] Oikonomou, I.; Platanakis, E.; Sutcliffe, C., Socially responsible investment portfolios: Does the optimization process matter?, The British Accounting Review, 50, 4, 379-401 (2018)
[76] Ouchen, A., Is the esg portfolio less turbulent than a market benchmark portfolio?, Risk Management, 24, 1, 1-33 (2022)
[77] OVE, 2018. Conditions de vie des étudiant(e)s 2016. Accessed 17 April 2023 http://www.ove-national.education.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Fiche_Ressources_economiques_des_etudiants_CdV_2016.pdf.
[78] Pástor, L.; Stambaugh, R. F.; Taylor, L. A., Sustainable investing in equilibrium, Journal of Financial Economics, 142, 2, 550-571 (2021)
[79] Prissé, B.; Jorrat, D., Lab vs online experiments: No differences, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 100, 101910 (2022)
[80] Prol, J. L.; Kim, K., Risk-return performance of optimized esg equity portfolios in the nyse, Finance Research Letters, 50, 103312 (2022)
[81] Rathner, S., The performance of socially responsible investment funds: A meta-analysis, University of Salzburg, Working Papers in Economics (2012)
[82] Revelli, C.; Viviani, J.-L., Financial performance of socially responsible investing (sri): what have we learned? a meta-analysis, Business Ethics: A European Review, 24, 2, 158-185 (2015)
[83] Riedl, A.; Smeets, P., Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds?, The Journal of Finance, 72, 6, 2505-2550 (2017)
[84] Schwaiger, R.; Kirchler, M.; Lindner, F.; Weitzel, U., Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction. a study with financial professionals, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 110, 103675 (2020) · Zbl 1460.91267
[85] Shang, J.; Croson, R., A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods, The economic journal, 119, 540, 1422-1439 (2009)
[86] Tran, A.; Zeckhauser, R., Rank as an inherent incentive: Evidence from a field experiment, Journal of Public Economics, 96, 9-10, 645-650 (2012)
[87] Utz, S.; Wimmer, M.; Steuer, R. E., Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds, European Journal of Operational Research, 246, 1, 331-338 (2015) · Zbl 1346.91241
[88] Villeval, M. C., Performance feedback and peer effects, Springer International Publishing, Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics, 1-38 (2020)
[89] Weitzel, U.; Huber, C.; Huber, J.; Kirchler, M.; Lindner, F.; Rose, J., Bubbles and financial professionals, The Review of Financial Studies, 33, 6, 2659-2696 (2020)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.