×

A comparative study on a firm’s optimal production decision considering risk aversion and carbon policies. (English) Zbl 1522.91144

Summary: To cope with global warming and achieve the goal of carbon emission reduction, various carbon policies have been implemented in many countries and regions. Some studies have indicated that with the popularity of low carbon, a small proportion of consumers show a green purchasing tendency. However, for firms, it is still difficult to predict the green purchase preferences of most consumers, and firms may face greater market demand uncertainty, which will bring profit risks. We assume that a firm’s decision is subject to its behavioral considerations, that is, its risk attitude. Considering the risk preferences of decision-makers and carbon emission policies, this paper addresses decision optimization in operations management. Our purpose is to analyze the optimal production decisions of risk-averse firms under carbon cap and carbon tax policies. Adopting the CVaR (conditional value-at-risk) criterion, we construct an optimization model with the constraints of carbon policies and obtain the analytic formula of optimal solutions. Then, we compare the optimal operational decisions for risk-averse firms and risk-neutral firms and further explore the impact of risk aversion on production and the parameters of carbon policy. Finally, some numerical studies are presented to analyze the carbon policies and risk aversion on firms’ operational decisions and give some managerial insights based on the analysis results.

MSC:

91B38 Production theory, theory of the firm
91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)
91B06 Decision theory

References:

[1] N. Absi, S. Dauzère-Pérès, S. Kedad-Sidhoum, B. Penz and C. Rapine, Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227 (2013) 55-61. · Zbl 1292.90105
[2] Q. Bai and M. Chen, The distributionally robust newsvendor problem with dual sourcing under carbon tax and cap-and-trade regulations. Comput. Ind. Eng. 98 (2016) 260-274.
[3] Q. Bai, J. Xu and S.C. Satyaveer, Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 142 (2020) 106-324.
[4] Q. Bai, M. Chen, Y. Nikolaidis and J. Xu, Improving sustainability and social responsibility of a two-tier supply chain investing in emission reduction technology. Appl. Math. Model. 95 (2021) 688-714. · Zbl 1481.90045
[5] Q. Bai, J. Xu, Y. Gong and S.S. Chauhan, Robust decisions for regulated sustainable manufacturing with partial demand information: mandatory emission capacity versus emission tax. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 298 (2022) 874-893. · Zbl 1490.90010
[6] S. Benjaafar, Y. Li and M. Daskin, Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10 (2013) 99-116.
[7] Q. Chai, Z. Xiao, K.H. Lai and G. Zhou, Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 203 (2018) 311-321.
[8] A. Chelly, I. Nouira, A.B. Hadj-Alouane and Y. Frein, A comparative study of progressive carbon taxation strategies: impact on firms’ economic and environmental performances. Int. J. Prod. Res. 60 (2021) 3476-3500.
[9] Y. Chen, M. Xu and Z.G. Zhang, A risk-averse newsvendor model under the CVaR criterion. Oper. Res. 57 (2009) 1040-1044. · Zbl 1233.90015
[10] J. Dai and W. Meng, A risk-averse newsvendor model under marketing-dependency and price-dependency. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 160 (2015) 220-229.
[11] S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, Effect of variable carbon emission in a multi-objective transportation-p facility location problem under neutrosophic environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 132 (2019) 311-324.
[12] S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, An approximation approach for fixed-charge transportation-p-facility location problem, in LSCM 2020: Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021) 219-237.
[13] S.K. Das, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, An exact and a heuristic approach for the transportation-p-facility location problem. Comput. Manag. Sci. 17 (2020) 389-407. · Zbl 07304216
[14] S.K. Das, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, Heuristic approaches for solid transportation-p-facility location problem. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 28 (2020) 939-961. · Zbl 07252393
[15] S.K. Das, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, Application of type-2 fuzzy logic to a multi objective green solid transportation-location problem with dwell time under carbon tax, cap, and offset policy: fuzzy versus nonfuzzy techniques. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 28 (2020) 2711-2725.
[16] S.K. Das, M. Pervin, S.K. Roy and G.W. Weber, Multi-objective solid transportation-location problem with variable carbon emission in inventory management: a hybrid approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 324 (2023) 283-309. · Zbl 1519.90100
[17] C. Dong, B. Shen, P.S. Chow, L. Yang and C.T. Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Ann. Oper. Res. 240 (2016) 509-531. · Zbl 1360.90028
[18] G. Dou and K. Cao, A joint analysis of environmental and economic performances of closed-loop supply chains under carbon tax regulation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 146 (2020) 106624.
[19] G. Duan, F. Nur, M. Alizadeh, L. Chen, M. Marufuzzaman and J. Ma, Vessel routing and optimization for marine debris collection with consideration of carbon cap. J. Clean. Prod. 263 (2020) 121399.
[20] Y.Y. Fan, M. Wang and L.D. Zhao, Production-inventory and emission reduction investment decision under carbon cap-and-trade policy. RAIRO: OR 52 (2018) 1043-1067. · Zbl 1411.91440
[21] A. Ghosh, Optimisation of a production-inventory model under two different carbon policies and proposal of a hybrid carbon policy under random demand. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 14 (2021) 280-292.
[22] A. Ghosh, J.K. JhA and S.P. Sarmah, Optimal lot-sizing under strict carbon cap policy considering stochastic demand. Appl. Math. Model. 44 (2017) 688-704. · Zbl 1443.90027
[23] D. Krass, T. Nedorezov and A. Ovchinnikov, Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Prod. Oper. Manag. 22 (2013) 1035-1055.
[24] S. Kumar, B. Sarkar and A. Kumar, Fuzzy reverse logistics inventory model of smart items with two warehouses of a retailer considering carbon emissions. RAIRO: OR 55 (2021) 2285-2307. · Zbl 1475.90008
[25] J. Li, Q. Su and L. Ma, Production and transportation outsourcing decisions in the supply chain under single and multiple carbon policies. J. Clean. Prod. 141 (2017) 1109-1122.
[26] J. Liu and C. Hu, Study on green supply chain cooperation and carbon tax policy considering consumer’s behavior. Math. Prob. Eng. 2020 (2020) 1-17. · Zbl 1459.91109
[27] X. Meng, Z. Yao, J. Nie, Y. Zhao and Z. Li, Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: effects of the power structure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 200 (2018) 224-230.
[28] A.M.A. Mohammad and Z.S. Shokri, Risk-averse multi-product selective newsvendor problem with different market entry scenarios under CVaR criterion. Comput. Ind. Eng. 103 (2017) 250-261.
[29] G.C. Pflug, A value-of-information approach to measuring risk in multi-period economic activity. J. Bank. Financ. 26 (2006) 1443-1471.
[30] Q. Qi, J. Wang and Q. Bai, Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 151 (2017) 286-302.
[31] Q. Qi, R. Zhang and Q. Bai, Joint decisions on emission reduction and order quantity by a risk-averse firm under cap-and-trade regulation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 162 (2021) 107783.
[32] A. Rami, M. Hariga and A. Shamayleh, Sustainable dynamic lot sizing models for cold products under carbon cap policy. Comput. Ind. Eng. 149 (2020) 106800.
[33] R.T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2 (2000) 21-42.
[34] R.T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Bank. Financ. 26 (2002) 1443-1471.
[35] M.D. Roy and S.S. Sana, Multi-echelon green supply chain model with random defectives, remanufacturing and rework under setup cost reduction and variable transportation cost. S¯dhan¯46 (2021) 211.
[36] M.D. Roy and S.S. Sana, The return and remanufacturing rates in a multi-stage green supply chain system with rework, variable shipping cost and ordering cost reduction. Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logist. 10 (2023) 2113174
[37] R. Schur, J. Gönsch and M. Hassler, Time-consistent, risk-averse dynamic pricing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 277 (2019) 587-603. · Zbl 1431.91445
[38] M.E. Schweitzer and G.P. Cachon, Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: experimental evidence. Manag. Sci. 46 (2000) 404-420. · Zbl 1231.90058
[39] L. Shaw, S.K. Das and S.K. Roy, Location-allocation problem for resource distribution under uncertainty in disaster relief operations. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 82 (2022) 101232.
[40] H. Sun and J.K. Gao, Research on the carbon emission regulation and optimal state of market structure: based on the perspective of evolutionary game of different stages. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 2351-2366. · Zbl 1498.91301
[41] H. Sun and J. Yang, Optimal decisions for competitive manufacturers under carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156 (2021) 107244.
[42] D. Wang, S. Dimitrov and L. Jian, Optimal inventory decisions for a risk-averse retailer when offering layaway. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284 (2020) 108-120. · Zbl 1441.90013
[43] M. Wu, S. Zhu and R.H. Teunter, The risk-averse newsvendor problem with random capacity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231 (2013) 328-336. · Zbl 1317.90040
[44] X. Xu, C.C. Chan and A. Langevin, Coping with risk management and fill rate in the loss-averse newsvendor model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195 (2018) 296-310.
[45] L. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Miao and J. Chen, Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness. RAIRO: OR 53 (2019) 1675-1689. · Zbl 1430.90153
[46] X. Xu, Z. Meng, R. Shen, M. Jiang and P. Ji, Optimal decisions for the loss-averse newsvendor problem under CVaR. Int. J .Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 146-159.
[47] W. Xue, L. Ma and H. Shen, Optimal inventory and hedging decisions with CVaR consideration. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 162 (2015) 70-82.
[48] H. Yang and W. Chen, Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharing. Omega (2017) 1-13.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.