×

A new mixed MNP model accommodating a variety of dependent non-normal coefficient distributions. (English) Zbl 1395.62111

Summary: In this paper, we propose a general copula approach to accommodate non-normal continuous mixing distributions in multinomial probit models. In particular, we specify a multivariate mixing distribution that allows different marginal continuous parametric distributions for different coefficients. A new hybrid estimation technique is proposed to estimate the model, which combines the advantageous features of each of the maximum simulated likelihood inference technique and Bhat’s maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood inference approach. The effectiveness of our formulation and inference approach is demonstrated through simulation exercises and an empirical application.

MSC:

62H05 Characterization and structure theory for multivariate probability distributions; copulas
60E05 Probability distributions: general theory
91B06 Decision theory

Software:

sn; AMLET
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Amador, F. J., Gonzales, R., & Ortuzar, J. (2005). Preference heterogeneity and willingness to pay for travel time savings. Transportation, 32(6), 627-647. · doi:10.1007/s11116-005-3734-y
[2] Azzalini, A. (2013). The Skew-normal and Related Families (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 1338.62007 · doi:10.1017/CBO9781139248891
[3] Balcombe, K., Chalak, A., & Fraser, I. M. (2009). Model selection for the mixed logit with Bayesian estimation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(2), 226-237. · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.06.001
[4] Bartels, R., Fiebig, D. G., & van Soest, A. (2006). Consumers and experts: An econometric analysis of the demand for water heaters. Empirical Economics, 31(2), 369-391. · doi:10.1007/s00181-006-0052-y
[5] Bastin, F., Cirillo, C., & Toint, P. L. (2010). Estimating nonparametric random utility models with an application to the value of time in heterogeneous populations. Transportation Science, 44(4), 537-549. · doi:10.1287/trsc.1100.0321
[6] Berry, S. T., & Haile, P. A. (2014). Identification in differentiated products markets using market level data. Econometrica, 82(5), 1749-1797. · Zbl 1419.91458 · doi:10.3982/ECTA9027
[7] Bhat, C. R. (1997). Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transportation Research Part B, 31(1), 41-54. · doi:10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00016-1
[8] Bhat, C.R. (2004). Austin commuter survey: Findings and recommendations. Technical Report, Department of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin. http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/reports/austin_commuter_survey_report.doc
[9] Bhat, C. R. (2011). The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models. Transportation Research Part B, 45(7), 923-939. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2011.04.005
[10] Bhat, C. R. (2014). The composite marginal likelihood (CML) inference approach with applications to discrete and mixed dependent variable models. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 7(1), 1-117. (Now Publishers Inc.). · Zbl 1293.62045 · doi:10.1561/0800000022
[11] Bhat, C. R., & Eluru, N. (2009). A copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research Part B, 43(7), 749-765. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2009.02.001
[12] Bhat, C. R., & Guo, J. Y. (2007). A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research Part B, 41(5), 506-526. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.12.005
[13] Bhat, C. R., & Sardesai, R. (2006). The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transportation Research Part B, 40(9), 709-730. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2005.09.008
[14] Bhat, C. R., & Sidharthan, R. (2012). A new approach to specify and estimate non-normally mixed multinomial probit models. Transportation Research Part B, 46(7), 817-833. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2012.02.007
[15] Bhat, C. R., Dubey, S. K., & Nagel, K. (2015). Introducing non-normality of latent psychological constructs in choice modeling with an application to bicyclist route choice. Transportation Research Part B, 78, 341-363. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.04.005
[16] Bhat, C. R., Sener, I. N., & Eluru, N. (2010). A flexible spatially dependent discrete choice model: Formulation and application to teenagers’ weekday recreational activity participation. Transportation Research Part B, 44(8-9), 903-921. · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.003
[17] Capitanio, A. (2010). On the approximation of the tail probability of the scalar skew-normal distribution. Metron, 68(3), 299-308. · Zbl 1301.62026 · doi:10.1007/BF03263541
[18] Cedilnik, A., Kosmelj, K., & Blejec, A. (2006). Ratio of two random variables: A note on the existence of its moments. Metodološki Zvezki—Advances in Methodology and Statistics, 3(1), 1-7. · Zbl 1248.92024 · doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2005.09.013
[19] Cirillo, C., & Axhausen, K. W. (2006). Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary. Transportation Research Part A, 40(5), 444-457.
[20] Daly, A., Hess, S., & Train, K. (2011). Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. Transportation, 39(1), 19-31. · doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9331-3
[21] Godambe, V. P. (1960). An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 31(4), 1208-1211. · Zbl 0118.34301 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705693
[22] Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 1085.62001 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610356
[23] Ho, C., & Mulley, C. (2015). Intra-household interactions in tour-based mode choice: The role of social, temporal, spatial and resource constraints. Transport Policy, 38, 52-63. · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.12.001
[24] il Kim, K. (2014). Identification of the distribution of random coefficients in static and dynamic discrete choice models. The Korean Economic Review, 30(2), 191-216.
[25] Joe, H. (2015). Dependence Modeling with Copulas. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis.
[26] Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. (1989). A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 379-390. · doi:10.2307/3172759
[27] Luce, RD; Suppes, P.; Luce, RD (ed.); Bush, RR (ed.); Galanter, EH (ed.), Preference, utility, and subjective probability, No. 3, 249-410 (1965), New York
[28] McFadden, D. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 303-328. · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(74)90003-6
[29] McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5), 447-470. · doi:10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1
[30] Mittelhammer, R. C., & Judge, G. (2011). A family of empirical likelihood functions and estimators for the binary response model. Journal of Econometrics, 164(2), 207-217. · Zbl 1441.62813
[31] Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. · Zbl 1152.62030
[32] Ory, D. T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 97-123. · Zbl 1301.62026
[33] Paleti, R., & Bhat, C. R. (2013). The composite marginal likelihood (CML) estimation of panel ordered-response models. Journal of Choice Modelling, 7, 24-43. · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2013.04.006
[34] Paleti, R., Bhat, C., & Pendyala, R. (2013). Integrated model of residential location, work location, vehicle ownership, and commute tour characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2382, 162-172. · doi:10.3141/2382-18
[35] Pinjari, A., & Bhat, C. (2006). Nonlinearity of response to level-of-service variables in travel mode choice models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1977, 67-74. · doi:10.3141/1977-11
[36] Revelt, D., & Train, K. (1998). Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 647-657. · doi:10.1162/003465398557735
[37] Sklar, A. (1959). Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 8, 229-231. · Zbl 0100.14202
[38] Sklar, A. (1973). Random variables, joint distribution functions, and copulas. Kybernetika, 9(6), 449-460. · Zbl 0292.60036
[39] Small, K. A. (2012). Valuation of travel time. Economics of Transportation, 1(1), 2-14. · doi:10.1016/j.ecotra.2012.09.002
[40] Torres, C., Hanley, N., & Riera, A. (2011). How wrong can you be? Implications of incorrect utility function specification for welfare measurement in choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(1), 111-121. · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.007
[41] Train, K., & Sonnier, G. (2005). Mixed logit with bounded distributions of correlated partworths. In R. Scarpa, A. Alberini (Eds.), Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics (Ch. 7, pp. 117-134). Dordrecht: Springer.
[42] Train, K., & Weeks, M. (2005). Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space. In R. Scarpa, A. Alberini (Eds.) Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics (Ch. 1, pp. 1-16). Dordrecht: Springer.
[43] Trivedi, P. K., & Zimmer, D. M. (2007). Copula modeling: An introduction for practitioners. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 1(1), 1-111. (Now Publishers Inc.). · Zbl 1195.91130 · doi:10.1561/0800000005
[44] Varin, C., & Vidoni, P. (2005). A note on composite likelihood inference and model selection. Biometrika, 92(3), 519-528. · Zbl 1183.62037 · doi:10.1093/biomet/92.3.519
[45] Wang, R. (2015). The stops made by commuters: Evidence from the 2009 US National Household Travel Survey. Journal of Transport Geography, 47, 109-118. · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.11.005
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.