×

Algebraic geometry versus Kähler geometry. (English) Zbl 1217.14009

In this nicely written survey article, the author gives a detailed account of her work on Hodge theory of compact Kähler manifolds with a particular emphasis on the case of complex projective varieties. The special features of Hodge theory on algebraic varieties are investigated along two guidelines: the existence of a gap between the topology of complex projective varieties and general compact Kähler manifolds, and the notion of absolute Hodge classes (and Hodge loci) in the algebraic case.
The first sections of the paper are thus devoted to illustrate this gap through the examples she discovered in [Invent. Math. 157, No. 2, 329–343 (2004; Zbl 1065.32010)] and [J. Differ. Geom. 72, No. 1, 43–71 (2006; Zbl 1102.32008)] and which give a negative answer to the Kodaira problem: there exist (in dimension at least 4) compact Kähler manifolds which do not have the homotopy type of projective varieties. Actually, the cohomology algebra of the examples above (which are obtained as blow-ups of certain non-projective tori) cannot be isomorphic to the cohomology algebra of a projective manifold. The interaction between the rational polarization and the product structure on the cohomology algebra of a projective manifold gives then rise to new constraints in the algebraic case. One of the main tools used in this study is a lemma due to Deligne which provides a criterion to detect Hodge substructure in cohomology algebras. It is quite surprising that this approach also leads to the construction of new examples of symplectic manifolds which satisfy the classical constraints of Hodge theory (such as the hard Lefschetz theorem) but not having the cohomology algebra of a compact Kähler manifold. The construction is reasonably simple since these symplectic manifolds are realized as projective bundles over complex tori.
The Hodge classes are the main subject of the last section and (pursuing the first guideline) the author establishes first that their behaviour is very different in the general compact Kähler case than in the algebraic one. There indeed exists a compact Kähler manifold \(X\) (a general Weil torus for instance) which admits Hodge classes of bidegree (2,2) but with the property that \(c_2(\mathcal{F})=0\) for any coherent sheaf \(\mathcal{F}\) on \(X\). In particular, the Hodge Conjecture has no natural generalization in the compact Kähler setting.
The remaining part of the paper focuses on the Hodge classes in the projective case. The fact that the cohomology of a projective variety can be computed algebraically (through the GAGA principles and the algebraic de Rham complex) enables to define the notion of an absolute Hodge class. These are the classes which remain rational on any conjugate of the variety (under the group of field automorphisms of \(\mathbb{C}\)). The cycle classes are easily seen to be absolute, and the Hodge conjecture has the following implication: any Hodge class is absolute.
The last results of the paper are related to the algebraicity of Hodge loci of a given Hodge class \(\alpha\) on a projective variety \(X\) (shown in [E. Cattani, P. Deligne and A. Kaplan, J. Am. Math. Soc. 8, No. 2, 483–506 (1995; Zbl 0851.14004)]); these are (roughly) the points in the full family of deformations of \(X\) where the class \(\alpha\) remains a Hodge class. Some questions concerning arithmetical aspects of Hodge conjecture are finally discussed and connected to the fields of definition of the Hodge loci.

MSC:

14C30 Transcendental methods, Hodge theory (algebro-geometric aspects)
14D07 Variation of Hodge structures (algebro-geometric aspects)
14F40 de Rham cohomology and algebraic geometry
32Q15 Kähler manifolds
32Q55 Topological aspects of complex manifolds
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] J. Amorós, M. Burger, K. Corlette, D. Kotschick, D. Toledo. Fundamental groups of compact Kähler manifolds, Mathematical Surveys andMonographs, 44. AmericanMathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996. · Zbl 0849.32006
[2] S. Bando, Y.-T. Siu. Stable sheaves and Einstein–Hermitian metrics, in Geometry and Analysis on Complex Manifolds (T. Mabuchi et al. Eds), World Scientific, New Jersey 39–50 (1994). · Zbl 0880.32004
[3] S. Bloch, A. Ogus. Gersten’s conjecture and the homology of schemes. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 7 (1974), 181–201 (1975). · Zbl 0307.14008
[4] S. Bloch. Semi–regularity and de Rham cohomology. Invent. Math. 17 (1972), 51–66. · Zbl 0254.14011 · doi:10.1007/BF01390023
[5] A. Borel, J.-P. Serre. Le théorème de Riemann–Roch (d’après Grothendieck), Bull. Soc. Math. France, 86, (1958), 97136.
[6] N. Buchdahl. Algebraic deformations of compact Kähler surfaces, Math. Z. 253 (2006), no. 3, 453–459. · Zbl 1118.32016
[7] N. Buchdahl. Algebraic deformations of compact Kähler surfaces. II. Math. Z. 258 (2008), no. 3, 493–498. · Zbl 1132.32007
[8] E. Cattani, P. Deligne, A. Kaplan, On the locus of Hodge classes, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 8, 483–506 (1995). · Zbl 0851.14004 · doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-1995-1273413-2
[9] F. Charles. Conjugate varieties with distinct real cohomology algebras. J. Reine Angew. Math. 630 (2009), 125–139. · Zbl 1222.14122 · doi:10.1515/CRELLE.2009.036
[10] P. Deligne, Ph. Griffiths, J. Morgan, D. Sullivan. Real homotopy theory of Kähler manifolds, Inventiones Math. 2 (1975), 245–274. · Zbl 0312.55011 · doi:10.1007/BF01389853
[11] P. Deligne. Théorie de Hodge II, Publ. Math. IHES 40, 5–57 (1971). · Zbl 0219.14007
[12] P. Deligne. Hodge cycles on abelian varieties (notes by JS Milne), in Springer LNM, 900, 9–100 (1982). · Zbl 0537.14006
[13] J.-P. Demailly, T. Eckl, T. Peternell. Line bundles on complex tori and a conjecture of Kodaira. Comment. Math. Helv. 80 (2005), no. 2, 229–242. · Zbl 1078.32014
[14] P. Deligne, Ph. Griffiths, J. Morgan, D. Sullivan. Real homotopy theory of Kähler manifolds, Inventiones Math. 2 (1975), 245–274. · Zbl 0312.55011 · doi:10.1007/BF01389853
[15] W. Fulton. Intersection Theory, Ergebnisse der Math. und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3. Folge. Band. 2, Springer (1984).
[16] R. Gompf. A new construction of symplectic manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 142 (1995), 527–595. · Zbl 0849.53027 · doi:10.2307/2118554
[17] Ph. Griffiths. Periods of integrals on algebraic manifolds, I, II, Amer. J. Math. 90 (1968), 568–626, 805–865. · Zbl 0169.52303
[18] Ph. Griffiths. Curvature properties of the Hodge bundles, in [19], 29–49.
[19] Ph. Griffiths and al. Topics in transcendental algebraic geometry, ed. by P. Griffiths, Annals of math. studies, study 106, Princeton University Press 1984.
[20] J. Grivaux. Chern classes in Deligne cohomology for coherent analytic sheaves, arXiv:0712.2207, to appear in Math. Ann. · Zbl 1193.14026
[21] M. Gromov. Pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectic manifolds. Invent. Math. 82 (1985), no. 2, 307–347. · Zbl 0592.53025
[22] A. Grothendieck. La théorie des classes de Chern, Bull. Soc. Math. France 86, 1958 137–154. · Zbl 0091.33201
[23] A. Grothendieck. On the de Rham cohomology of algebraic varieties, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. No. 29 1966 95–103. · Zbl 0145.17602
[24] S. Kleiman. Algebraic cycles and the Weil conjectures. Dix exposés sur la cohomologie des schémas, pp. 359–386. North–Holland, Amsterdam; Masson, Paris, (1968).
[25] K. Kodaira. On Kähler varieties of restricted type (an intrinsic characterization of algebraic varieties), Ann. of Math. 60, 28–48 (1954). · Zbl 0057.14102 · doi:10.2307/1969701
[26] K. Kodaira. On compact complex analytic surfaces, I, Ann. of Math. 71 (1960), 111–152. · Zbl 0098.13004 · doi:10.2307/1969881
[27] D. McDuff. Examples of simply connected symplectic non Kaehlerian manifolds, Journal of Differential Geometry 20, 267–277 (1984). · Zbl 0567.53031
[28] D.Mumford. Abelian varieties, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, No. 5; Oxford Universitx Press, London (1970). · Zbl 0223.14022
[29] J.-P. Serre. Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique, Ann. Inst. Fourier 6, 1–42 (1956).
[30] I. Shimada. Non–homeomorphic conjugate complex varieties, arXiv:math/0701115. · Zbl 1192.14017
[31] W. Thurston. Some simple examples of symplectic manifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 55 (1976), no. 2, 467–468. · Zbl 0324.53031
[32] A. Tralle, J. Oprea. Symplectic manifolds with no Kähler structure. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1661. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1997. · Zbl 0891.53001
[33] J.-P. Serre. Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique, Ann. Inst. Fourier 6, 1–42 (1956).
[34] K. Uhlenbeck, S. Yau : On the existence of Hermitian–Yang–Mills connections in stable vector bundles, Comm. Pure and Applied Math. 39–S (1986) 257–293. · Zbl 0615.58045
[35] C. Voisin. A counterexample to the Hodge conjecture extended to Kähler varieties, IMRN , n0 20, 1057–1075 (2002). · Zbl 1048.14004
[36] C. Voisin. On the homotopy types of compact Kähler and complex projective manifolds, Inventiones Math. Volume 157, Number 2, 329 – 343 (2004). · Zbl 1065.32010
[37] C. Voisin. On the homotopy types of Kähler manifolds and the birational Kodaira problem, J. Differential Geom. 72 (2006), no. 1, 43–71. · Zbl 1102.32008
[38] C. Voisin. Hodge loci and absolute Hodge classes, Compositio Math. Vol. 143, Part 4, 945–958, 2007. · Zbl 1124.14015
[39] C. Voisin. Some aspects of the Hodge conjecture, Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 2, 261–296 (2007). · Zbl 1159.14005 · doi:10.1007/s11537-007-0639-x
[40] C. Voisin. Hodge structures on cohomology algebras and geometry. Math. Ann. 341 (2008), no. 1, 39–69. · Zbl 1142.14006
[41] C. Voisin. Hodge Theory and Complex Algebraic Geometry I, Cambridge studies in advanced Mathematics 76, Cambridge University Press 2002. · Zbl 1032.14001
[42] S. Zucker. The Hodge conjecture for cubic fourfolds, Compositio Math. 34, 199–209 (1977). · Zbl 0347.14005
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.