[1] |
NelsonJC, CookAJ, YuO, ZhaoS, JacksonLA, PsatyBM. Methods for observational post‐licensure medical product safety surveillance. Stat Methods Med Res. 2015;24(2):177‐193. |
[2] |
MooreN, Kreft‐JaisC, HaramburuF, et al. Reports of hypoglycaemia associated with the use of ACE inhibitors and other drugs: a case/non‐case study in the French pharmacovigilance system database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;44(5):513‐518. |
[3] |
BateA, LindquistM, EdwardsIR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54(4):315‐321. |
[4] |
EvansSJ, WallerPC, DavisS. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(6):483‐486. |
[5] |
WaldA. Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Ann Math Stat. 1945;16(2):117‐186. · Zbl 0060.30207 |
[6] |
PageES. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika. 1954;41(1/2):100‐115. · Zbl 0056.38002 |
[7] |
GriggOA, FarewellV, SpiegelhalterD. Use of risk‐adjusted CUSUM and RSPRTcharts for monitoring in medical contexts. Stat Methods Med Res. 2003;12(2):147‐170. |
[8] |
BrownJS, KulldorffM, ChanKA, et al. Early detection of adverse drug events within population‐based health networks: application of sequential testing methods. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(12):1275‐1284. |
[9] |
BrownJS, KulldorffM, PetronisKR, et al. Early adverse drug event signal detection within population‐based health networks using sequential methods: key methodologic considerations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(3):226‐234. |
[10] |
WhiteheadJ. The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 1997. |
[11] |
JennisonC, TurnbullBW. Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1999. |
[12] |
LiL, KulldorffM, NelsonJC, CookAJ. A propensity score‐enhanced sequential analytic method for comparative drug safety surveillance. Stat Biosci. 2011;3(1):45. |
[13] |
CookAJ, TiwariRC, WellmanRD, et al. Statistical approaches to group sequential monitoring of postmarket safety surveillance data: current state of the art for use in the mini‐sentinel pilot. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21:72‐81. |
[14] |
RobbinsH, MonroS. A stochastic approximation method. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22(3):400‐407. · Zbl 0054.05901 |
[15] |
SakrisonDJ. Efficient recursive estimation: application to estimating the parameter of a covariance function. Int J Eng Sci. 1965;3(4):461‐483. · Zbl 0137.37202 |
[16] |
ToulisP, AiroldiEM. Scalable estimation strategies based on stochastic approximations: classical results and new insights. Stat Comput. 2015;25(4):781‐795. · Zbl 1332.62291 |
[17] |
LinN, XiR. Aggregated estimating equation estimation. Stat Interface. 2011;4(1):73‐83. · Zbl 1245.62026 |
[18] |
SchifanoED, WuJ, WangC, YanJ, ChenMH. Online updating of statistical inference in the big data setting. Dent Tech. 2016;58(3):393‐403. |
[19] |
LuoL, SongPXK. Renewable estimation and incremental inference in generalized linear models with streaming datasets. J R Stat Soc: Ser B. 2020;82(1):69‐97. · Zbl 1440.62288 |
[20] |
FangY. Scalable statistical inference for averaged implicit stochastic gradient descent. Scand J Stat. 2019; 46(4):987‐1002. · Zbl 1444.62135 |
[21] |
PolyakBT, JuditskyAB. Acceleration of stochastic approximation by averaging. SIAM J Control Optim. 1992;30(4):838‐855. · Zbl 0762.62022 |
[22] |
StefanskiLA, BoosDD. The calculus of M‐estimation. Am Stat. 2002;56(1):29‐38. |
[23] |
RobinsJM, GreenlandS. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992;3(2):143‐155. |
[24] |
PearlJ. Direct and indirect effects. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (CA), 411‐420. 2001. |
[25] |
TchetgenEJT, ShpitserI. Semiparametric theory for causal mediation analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. Ann Stat. 2012;40(3):1816‐1845. · Zbl 1257.62033 |
[26] |
AngristJD, ImbensGW, RubinDB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91(434):444‐455. · Zbl 0897.62130 |
[27] |
HernánMA, RobinsJM. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist’s dream?Epidemiology. 2006;17(4):360‐372. |
[28] |
MiaoW, GengZ, Tchetgen TchetgenEJ. Identifying causal effects with proxy variables of an unmeasured confounder. Biometrika. 2018;105(4):987‐993. · Zbl 1506.62451 |
[29] |
ShiX, MiaoW, NelsonJC, Tchetgen TchetgenEJ. Multiply robust causal inference with double‐negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodology. 2020;82(2):521‐540. · Zbl 07554764 |
[30] |
TchetgenEJT, YingA, CuiY, ShiX, MiaoW. An Introduction to Proximal Causal Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10982 2020. |
[31] |
CuiY, PuH, ShiX, MiaoW, TchetgenET. Semiparametric proximal causal inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.08411 2020. |
[32] |
Splawa‐NeymanJ. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Stat Sci. 1990;5(4):465‐480. |
[33] |
RubinDB. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol. 1974;66(5):688‐701. |
[34] |
RosenbaumPR, RubinDB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41‐55. · Zbl 0522.62091 |
[35] |
AngristJD, KeuegerAB. Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings?Quart J Econ. 1991;106(4):979‐1014. |
[36] |
GodambeVP. An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation. Ann Math Stat. 1960;31(4):1208‐1211. · Zbl 0118.34301 |
[37] |
HuberPJ. Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann Math Stat. 1964;35:73‐101. · Zbl 0136.39805 |
[38] |
HuberPJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability: Weather Modification. 5. Univ of California Press, 221‐233. 1967. · Zbl 0212.21504 |
[39] |
LiangKY, ZegerSL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13‐22. · Zbl 0595.62110 |
[40] |
EfronB. Bayes and likelihood calculations from confidence intervals. Biometrika. 1993;80(1):3‐26. · Zbl 0773.62021 |
[41] |
LanK, DemetsD. Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical‐trials. Biometrika. 1983;70(3):659‐663. · Zbl 0543.62059 |
[42] |
LanK, DemetsD. Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach. Stat Med. 1994;13:1341‐1352. |
[43] |
PocockS. Interim analyses for randomized clinical‐trials ‐ the group sequential approach. Biometrics. 1982;38(1):153‐162. |
[44] |
O’BrienP, FlemingT. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35:549‐556. |
[45] |
YihWK, KulldorffM, FiremanBH, et al. Active surveillance for adverse events: the experience of the vaccine safety datalink project. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):S54‐S64. |
[46] |
WolfsonM, WallaceSE, MascaN, et al. DataSHIELD: resolving a conflict in contemporary bioscience—performing a pooled analysis of individual‐level data without sharing the data. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(5):1372‐1382. |
[47] |
LuoL, WangJ, HectorE. Statistical inference for streamed longitudinal data. Biometrika. 2023;110(4):841‐858. · Zbl 07801352 |