×

Overreaction to capital taxation in saving decisions. (English) Zbl 1517.91130

Summary: This paper studies the response of saving decisions to two alternative types of capital taxation: the wealth tax and the capital income tax. First, we conducted a lifecycle experiment using Amazon MTurk, wherein subjects made dynamic saving decisions. Subjects exhibited an overreaction to wealth taxes but not to capital income taxes: subjects’ savings decreased more with the introduction of a wealth tax than with a financially equivalent drop in capital returns. Second, we built a parsimonious behavioral model of individual optimization to characterize this overreaction and illustrate its welfare implications. Finally, additional treatments began to explore the root cause of this overreaction bias. We ruled out the explanation that the intrinsic aversion to paying wealth taxes drives overreaction. Instead, overreaction seems to be driven by subjects’ incorrect understanding of the effects of wealth taxes on their savings.

MSC:

91B64 Macroeconomic theory (monetary models, models of taxation)
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory
91-05 Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abeler, J.; Jäger, S., Complex tax incentives, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 3, 1-28 (2015)
[2] Altonji, J. G.; Segal, L. M., Small-sample bias in GMM estimation of covariance structures, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14, 3, 353-366 (1996)
[3] Anderhub, V.; Gäuth, W.; Mäuller, W.; Strobel, M., An experimental analysis of intertemporal allocation behavior, Experimental Economics, 3, 2, 137-152 (2000) · Zbl 0991.91040
[4] Ballinger, T. P., Palumbo, M. G., Wilcox, N. T., 2003. Precautionary saving and social learning across generations: An experiment. The Economic Journal, 113 (490), 920947.
[5] Barseghyan, L.; Molinari, F.; O’Donoghue, T.; Teitelbaum, J. C., The nature of risk preferences: evidence from insurance choices, American Economic Review, 103, 6, 2499-2529 (2013)
[6] Bernheim, B. D.; Taubinsky, D., Behavioral public economics, Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1,” 1, 381-516 (2018)
[7] Bhargava, S.; Loewenstein, G.; Sydnor, J., Choose to lose: health plan choices from a menu with dominated option, Q J Econ, 132, 3, 1319-1372 (2017)
[8] Blaufus, K.; Milde, M., Tax misperceptions and the effect of informational tax nudges on retirement savings, Manage Sci (2020)
[9] Blaufus, K.; Möhlmann, A., Wealth tax and investment risk: an experimental investigation, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 76, 1, 87 (2016)
[10] Blumkin, T.; Ruffle, B. J.; Ganun, Y., Are income and consumption taxes ever really equivalent? evidence from a real-effort experiment with real goods, Eur Econ Rev, 56, 6, 1200-1219 (2012)
[11] Bohr, C. E.; Holt, C. A.; Schubert, A. V., Assisted savings for retirement: an experimental analysis, Eur Econ Rev, 119, 42-54 (2019)
[12] Brown, A. L.; Chua, Z. E.; Camerer, C. F., Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic saving experiments, Q J Econ, 124, 1, 197-231 (2009)
[13] Brown, J. R.; Kapteyn, A.; Luttmer, E. F.; Mitchell, O. S.; Samek, A., Behavioral impediments to valuing annuities: complexity and choice bracketing, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1-45 (2019)
[14] Brülhart, M.; Gruber, J.; Krapf, M.; Schmidheiny, K., Taxing wealth: evidence from Switzerland (No. w22376) (2016), National Bureau of Economic Research
[15] Carbone, E., Understanding intertemporal choices, Appl Econ, 38, 8, 889-898 (2006)
[16] Carbone, E.; Duffy, J., Lifecycle consumption plans, social learning and external habits: experimental evidence, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 106, 413-427 (2014)
[17] Chari, V. V.; Kehoe, P. J., Optimal fiscal and monetary policy, Handbook of macroeconomics, 1, 1671-1745 (1999)
[18] Chen, D. L.; Schonger, M.; Wickens, C., Otreean open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments, J Behav Exp Finance, 9, 88-97 (2016)
[19] Chetty, R., Behavioral economics and public policy: a pragmatic perspective, American Economic Review, 105, 5, 1-33 (2015)
[20] Chetty, R.; Friedman, J. N.; Saez, E., Using differences in knowledge across neighborhoods to uncover the impacts of the EITC on earnings, American Economic Review, 103, 7, 2683-2721 (2013)
[21] Chetty, R.; Looney, A.; Kroft, K., Salience and taxation: theory and evidence, American economic review, 99, 4, 1145-1177 (2009)
[22] Choi, J. J.; Laibson, D.; Madrian, B. C., Why does the law of one price fail? an experiment on index mutual funds, Rev Financ Stud, 23, 4, 1405-1432 (2010)
[23] Choi, J. J.; Laibson, D.; Madrian, B. C., \(100 bills on the sidewalk: Suboptimal investment in 401 (k) plans, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 3, 748-763 (2011\)
[24] Conesa, J. C.; Kitao, S.; Krueger, D., Taxing capital? not a bad idea after all!, American Economic Review, 99, 1, 25-48 (2009)
[25] Duffy, J.,. Forthcoming.“macroeconomics: A survey of laboratory research”. Handbook of Experimental Economics, 2.
[26] Duffy, J.; Li, Y., Lifecycle consumption under different income profiles: evidence and theory, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 104, 74-94 (2019) · Zbl 1418.91282
[27] Farhi, E.; Gabaix, X., Optimal taxation with behavioral agents, American Economic Review, 110, 1, 298-336 (2020)
[28] Feldman, N. E.; Katuščák, P.; Kawano, L., Taxpayer confusion: evidence from the child tax credit, American Economic Review, 106, 3, 807-835 (2016)
[29] Feldman, N. E.; Ruffle, B. J., The impact of including, adding, and subtracting a tax on demand, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 1, 95-118 (2015)
[30] Feltovich, N., Nonparametric tests of differences in medians: comparison of the wilcoxonmannwhitney and robust rank-order tests, Experimental Economics, 6, 3, 273-297 (2003) · Zbl 1031.62035
[31] Finkelstein, A., E-Ztax: tax salience and tax rates, Q J Econ, 124, 3, 969-1010 (2009) · Zbl 1186.91148
[32] Geiger, M.; Luhan, W. J.; Scharler, J., When do fiscal consolidations lead to consumption booms? lessons from a laboratory experiment, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 69, 1-20 (2016)
[33] Gerritsen, A., 2016. Optimal nonlinear taxation: the dual approach.
[34] Goda, G. S.; Manchester, C. F.; Sojourner, A. J., What will my account really be worth? experimental evidence on how retirement income projections affect saving, J Public Econ, 119, 80-92 (2014)
[35] Goldin, J., Optimal tax salience, J Public Econ, 131, 115-123 (2015)
[36] Goldin, J.; Homonoff, T., Smoke gets in your eyes: cigarette tax salience and regressivity, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5, 1, 302-336 (2013)
[37] Golosov, M.; Tsyvinski, A.; Werning, I.; Diamond, P.; Judd, K. L., New dynamic public finance: a user’s guide [with comments and discussion], NBER Macroecon Annu, 21, 317-387 (2006)
[38] Gourinchas, P. O.; Parker, J. A., Consumption over the life cycle, Econometrica, 70, 1, 47-89 (2002) · Zbl 1137.91519
[39] Graham, J. R.; Hanlon, M.; Shevlin, T.; Shroff, N., Tax rates and corporate decision-making, Rev Financ Stud, 30, 9, 3128-3175 (2017)
[40] Guvenen, F.; Kambourov, G.; Kuruscu, B.; Ocampo-Diaz, S.; Chen, D., Use it or lose it: efficiency gains from wealth taxation (No. W26284), National Bureau of Economic Research (2019)
[41] Hara, K.; Adams, A.; Milland, K.; Savage, S.; Callison-Burch, C.; Bigham, J. P., A data-driven analysis of workers’ earnings on Amazon mechanical turk, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14) (2018)
[42] Hardisty, D. J.; Johnson, E. J.; Weber, E. U., A dirty word or a dirty world? attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory, Psychol Sci, 21, 1, 86-92 (2010)
[43] Hey, J. D.; Dardanoni, V., Optimal consumption under uncertainty: an experimental investigation, The Economic Journal, 98, 390, 105-116 (1988)
[44] Huet-Vaughn, E.; Robbett, A.; Spitzer, M., A taste for taxes: minimizing distortions using political preferences, J Public Econ, 180, 104055 (2019)
[45] Jakobsen, K.; Jakobsen, K.; Kleven, H.; Zucman, G., Wealth taxation and wealth accumulation: theory and evidence from denmark, Q J Econ, 135, 1, 329-388 (2020) · Zbl 1431.91247
[46] Kallbekken, S.; Kroll, S.; Cherry, T. L., Do you not like pigou, or do you not understand him? tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab, J Environ Econ Manage, 62, 1, 53-64 (2011)
[47] Kessler, J. B.; Norton, M. I., Tax aversion in labor supply, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 124, 15-28 (2016)
[48] Kessler, J. B., Vesterlund, L., 2015. The external validity of laboratory experiments: Qualitative rather than quantitative effects.
[49] Laibson, D.; Repetto, A.; Tobacman, J., Estimating discount functions with consumption choices over the lifecycle (No. w13314) (2007), National Bureau of Economic Research
[50] Luhan, W. J.; Roos, M. W.; Scharler, J., An experiment on consumption responses to future prices and interest rates, Experiments in Macroeconomics, 139-166 (2014), Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
[51] Malmendier, U.; Tate, G., CEO overconfidence and corporate investment, J Finance, 60, 6, 2661-2700 (2005)
[52] Martınez-Marquina, A.; Niederle, M.; Vespa, E., Failures in contingent reasoning: the role of uncertainty, American Economic Review, 109, 10, 3437-3474 (2019)
[53] Meissner, T., Intertemporal consumption and debt aversion: an experimental study, Experimental Economics, 19, 2, 281-298 (2016)
[54] Meissner, T.; Rostam-Afschar, D., Learning ricardian equivalence, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 82, 273-288 (2017) · Zbl 1401.91415
[55] Mirrlees, J. A., An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation, Rev Econ Stud, 38, 2, 175-208 (1971) · Zbl 0222.90028
[56] Moxnes, E., Over exploitation of renewable resources: the role of misperceptions, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 1, 107-127 (1998)
[57] Mullainathan, S.; Schwartzstein, J.; Congdon, W. J., A reduced-form approach to behavioral public finance, Annu. Rev. Econ., 4, 1, 511-540 (2012)
[58] Newey, W. K.; McFadden, D., Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing, Handbook of econometrics, 4, 2111-2245 (1994)
[59] Ossimitz, G., Stock-flow-thinking and reading stock-flow-related graphs: an empirical investigation in dynamic thinking abilities, In Proceedings of the 2002 International System Dynamics Conference (2002), Albany, NY: System Dynamics Society
[60] Piketty, T., Capital in the Twenty-first Century (2018), Harvard University Press
[61] Rees-Jones, A.; Taubinsky, D., Measuring “schmeduling”, Rev Econ Stud, 87, 5, 2399-2438 (2020) · Zbl 1504.91181
[62] Ring, M. A., 2020. Wealth taxation and household saving: Evidence from assessment discontinuities in norway.
[63] Scheuer, F.; Slemrod, J., Taxing our wealth, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35, 1, 207-230 (2021)
[64] Seim, D., Behavioral responses to wealth taxes: evidence from sweden, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9, 4, 395-421 (2017)
[65] Spiller, S. A.; Reinholtz, N.; Maglio, S. J., Judgments based on stocks and flows: different presentations of the same data can lead to opposing inferences, Management Science., 66, 5, 2213-2231 (2019)
[66] Sterman, J. D.; Sweeney, L. B., Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter, Clim Change, 80, 3, 213-238 (2007)
[67] Taubinsky, D.; Rees-Jones, A., Attention variation and welfare: theory and evidence from a tax salience experiment, Rev Econ Stud, 85, 4, 2462-2496 (2018) · Zbl 1405.91466
[68] Thaler, R. H.; Johnson, E. J., Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice, Manage Sci, 36, 6, 643-660 (1990)
[69] Zoutman, F. T., The effect of capital taxation on households’ portfolio composition and intertemporal choice, In CESifo Area Conference on Public Sector Economics (pp. 1-28) (2015)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.