Attitude control for rigid satellite under actuator constraint. (English) Zbl 1418.93198
Jia, Yingmin (ed.) et al., Proceedings of the 2015 Chinese intelligent systems conference, CISC’15, Yangzhou, China. Volume 2. Berlin: Springer. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 360, 267-273 (2016).
Summary: An attitude controller is proposed via employing backstepping control technique, and being represented by modified Rodriguez parameters. A general dynamic attitude model of satellites is deduced, along with a general model of actuator dynamics which can describe presumably all actuators for space application. External disturbances and actuator constraints are explicitly addressed. The control performance is proved in the numerical simulation experiences at last.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1337.93002].
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1337.93002].
MSC:
| 93C95 | Application models in control theory |
| 93A30 | Mathematical modelling of systems (MSC2010) |
| 93B40 | Computational methods in systems theory (MSC2010) |
| 93C15 | Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations |
| 93C10 | Nonlinear systems in control theory |
References:
| [1] | Yoon H, Agrawal BN (2009) Adaptive control of uncertain Hamiltonian multi-input multi-output systems: with application to spacecraft control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 17:900-906 |
| [2] | Seo D, Akella MR (2007) Separation property for the rigid body attitude tracking control problem. J Guidance Control Dyn 30:1569-1576 |
| [3] | Seo D, Akella MR (2008) High-performance spacecraft adaptive attitude-tracking control through attracting-manifold design. J Guidance Control Dyn 31:884-891 |
| [4] | Plestan F, Bregeault V, Glumineau A, Shtessel Y, Moulay E (2012) Advances in high order and adaptive sliding mode control-theory and applications. In: Sliding modes after the first decade of the 21st century. Springer, 2012, pp 465-492 |
| [5] | Sidi MJ (1997) Spacecraft dynamics and control: a practical engineering approach, vol 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| [6] | Sekara TB, Matausek MR (2009) Optimization of PID controller based on maximization of the proportional gain under constraints on robustness and sensitivity to measurement noise. IEEE Trans Autom Control 54:184-189 · Zbl 1367.93213 · doi:10.1109/TAC.2008.2008359 |
| [7] | Zou A-M, Kumar KD, Hou Z-G (2010) Quaternion-based adaptive output feedback attitude control of spacecraft using Chebyshev neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21:1457-1471 · doi:10.1109/TNN.2010.2050333 |
| [8] | Yin S, Ding S, Xie X, Luo H (2014) A review on basic data-driven approaches for industrial process monitoring. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 61:6418-6428 · doi:10.1109/TIE.2014.2301773 |
| [9] | Crassidis JL, Markley FL (1996) Sliding mode control using modified Rodrigues parameters. J Guidance Control Dyn 19:1381-1383 · Zbl 0865.93044 |
| [10] | Sidi MJ (1997) Spacecraft dynamics and control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815652 |
| [11] | Schaub H, Akella MR, Junkins JL (2001) Adaptive control of nonlinear attitude motions realizing linear closed loop dynamics. J Guidance Control Dyn 24:95-100 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
