×

Why males compete rather than care, with an application to supplying collective goods. (English) Zbl 1466.92126

Summary: The question of why males invest more into competition than offspring care is an age-old problem in evolutionary biology. On the one hand, paternal care could increase the fraction of offspring surviving to maturity. On the other hand, competition could increase the likelihood of more paternities and thus the relative number of offspring produced. While drivers of these behaviours are often intertwined with a wide range of other constraints, here we present a simple dynamic model to investigate the benefits of these two alternative fitness-enhancing pathways. Using this framework, we evaluate the sensitivity of equilibrium dynamics to changes in payoffs for male allocation to mating versus parenting. Even with strong effects of care on offspring survivorship, small competitive benefits can outweigh benefits from care. We consider an application of the model that includes men’s competition for hunting reputations where big game supplies a benefit to all and find a frequency-dependent parameter region within which, depending on initial population proportions, either strategy may outperform the other. Results demonstrate that allocation to competition gives males greater fitness than offspring care for a range of circumstances that are dependent on life-history parameters and, for the large-game hunting application, frequency dependent. The greater the collective benefit, the more individuals can be selected to supply it.

MSC:

92D15 Problems related to evolution
34C60 Qualitative investigation and simulation of ordinary differential equation models
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Andersson, BM, Sexual selection (1994), Princeton: Princeton University Press, Princeton
[2] Balshine, S.; Royle, NJ; Smiseth, PT; Kölliker, M., Patterns of parental care in vertebrates, The evolution of parental care, chapter 4, 62-80 (2012), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford
[3] Bateman, AJ, Intra-sexual selection in drosophila, Heredity, 2, Pt. 3, 349-368 (1948)
[4] Berbesque, JC; Marlowe, FW, Sex differences in food preferences of Hadza hunter-gatherers, Evol Psychol, 7, 4, 147470490900700409 (2009)
[5] Bird, R., Cooperation and conflict: the behavioral ecology of the sexual division of labor, Evol Anthropol Issues News Rev, 8, 2, 65-75 (1999)
[6] Blurton Jones, NG, Demography and evolutionary ecology of Hadza hunter-gatherers (2016), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[7] Clutton-Brock, T., The evolution of parental care (1991), Princeton: Princeton University Press, Princeton
[8] Clutton-Brock, TH; ParkerParker, GA, Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection, Q Rev Biol, 67, 4, 437-456 (1992)
[9] Cockburn, A., Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 273, 1592, 1375-1383 (2006) · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3458
[10] Coxworth, JE; Kim, PS; McQueen, JS; Hawkes, K., Grandmothering life histories and human pair bonding, Proc Nat Acad Sci, 112, 38, 11806-11811 (2015) · doi:10.1073/pnas.1599993112
[11] Darwin, C., On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life (1859), London: John Murray, London
[12] Darwin, C., The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (1874), London: John Murray, London
[13] Dewsbury, DA, The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context, Integr Comp Biol, 45, 5, 831-837 (2005)
[14] Fisher, DA, The genetical theory of natural selection (1930), Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford · JFM 56.1106.13
[15] Fromhage, L.; Michael, DJ, Coevolution of parental investment and sexually selected traits drives sex-role divergence, Nat Commun, 7, 12517 (2016)
[16] Grafen, A., Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process, J Theor Biol, 144, 4, 473-516 (1990)
[17] Grafen, A., Biological signals as handicaps, J Theor Biol, 144, 4, 517-546 (1990)
[18] Gurven, G.; Kaplan, H., Longevity among hunter-gatherers: a cross-cultural examination, Popul Dev Rev, 33, 2, 321-365 (2007)
[19] Hardin, G., Extensions of “the tragedy of the commons”, Science, 280, 5364, 682-683 (1998)
[20] Hawkes, K., Showing off: tests of an hypothesis about men’s foraging goals, Ethol Sociobiol, 12, 1, 29-54 (1991)
[21] Hawkes, K., Why hunter-gatherers work: an ancient version of the problem of public goods, Curr Anthropol, 34, 4, 341-361 (1993)
[22] Hawkes, K.; Bird, BB; Kristen Hawkes and Rebecca Bliege Bird, Showing off, handicap signaling, and the evolution of men’s work, Evol Anthropol Issues News Rev, 11, 2, 58-67 (2002)
[23] Hawkes, K.; O’Connell, JF; Blurton Jones, NJ, Hunting income patterns among the Hadza: big game, common goods, foraging goals and the evolution of the human diet, Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 334, 1270, 243-251 (1991)
[24] Hawkes, K.; O’Connell, JF; Blurton Jones, NG, Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans, Curr Anthropol, 38, 4, 551-577 (1997)
[25] Hawkes, K.; O’Connell, JF; Blurton Jones, NG, Hadza meat sharing, Evol Hum Behav, 22, 2, 113-142 (2001)
[26] Hawkes, K.; O’Connell, JF; Blurton Jones, NG; Bell, D.; Bird, R.; Bird, D.; Hames, R.; Ivey, P.; Judge, D.; Kazankov, A., Hunting and nuclear families: some lessons from the hadza about mens work, Curr Anthropol, 42, 5, 681-709 (2001)
[27] Hawkes, K.; O’Connell, JF; Jones, NGB, More lessons from the Hadza about men’s work, Hum Nat, 25, 4, 596-619 (2014)
[28] Henshaw, JM; Fromhage, L.; Jones, AG, Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization, Proc R Soc B, 286, 1909, 20191312 (2019)
[29] Hill, K.; Kaplan, H.; Hawkes, K.; Hurtado, AM, Men’s time allocation to subsistence work among the ache of eastern Paraguay, Hum Ecol, 13, 1, 29-47 (1985)
[30] Hill, K.; Kaplan, H.; Hurtado, AM, Foraging decisions among ache hunter-gatherers: new data and implications for optimal foraging models, Ethol Sociobiol, 8, 1, 1-36 (1987)
[31] Hill, K.; Hurtado, AM, Ache life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people (1996), New York: Aldine de Gruyter, New York
[32] Houston, AI; Szèkely, T.; McNamara, JM, Conflict between parents over care, Trends Ecol Evol, 20, 1, 33-38 (2005)
[33] Hurtado, AM; Hill, K.; Hurtado, I.; Kaplan, H., Trade-offs between female food acquisition and child care among hiwi and ache foragers, Hum Nat, 3, 3, 185-216 (1992)
[34] Hurtado, AM; Hawkes, K.; Hill, K.; Kaplan, H., Female subsistence strategies among ache hunter-gatherers of eastern Paraguay, Hum Ecol, 13, 1, 1-28 (1985)
[35] Isaac, G., The food-sharing behavior of protohuman hominids, Sci Am, 238, 4, 90-109 (1978)
[36] Janicke, T.; Häderer, IK; Lajeunesse, MJ; Anthes, N., Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom, Sci Adv, 2, 2, e1500983 (2016)
[37] Jennions, MD; Fromhage, L., Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection, Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 372, 1729, 20160312 (2017)
[38] Kim, PS; Coxworth, JE; Hawkes, K., Increased longevity evolves from grandmothering, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 279, 1749, 4880-4884 (2012)
[39] Kim, PS; McQueen, JS; Coxworth, JE; Hawkes, K., Grandmothering drives the evolution of longevity in a probabilistic model, J Theor Biol, 353, 84-94 (2014) · Zbl 1412.92219
[40] Hope, K.; Suzanne, HA; Michael, BB; Nick, JR; Smiseth, TP; Mathias, K., Theoretical foundations of parental care, The evolution of parental care, chapter 2, 21-36 (2012), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford
[41] Knott, DC; Ellison, P., Female reproductive ecology of the apes: implications for human evolution, Reproductive ecology and human evolution, 429-463 (2001), New York, NY: Aldine, New York, NY
[42] Kokko, H.; Jennions, MD, Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios, J Evol Biol, 21, 4, 919-948 (2008)
[43] Kokko, H.; Jennions, MD; Kölliker, M., Sex differences in parental care, The evolution of parental care, chapter 6, 101-116 (2012), Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford
[44] Lancaster, JB; Lancaster, CS; Ortner, DJ, Parental investment: the hominid adaptation, How humans adapt: a biocultural odyssey, 33-56 (1983), Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
[45] Lehtonen, J.; Parker, GA, Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes, Mol Hum Reprod, 20, 12, 1161-1168 (2014)
[46] Lehtonen, J.; Parker, GA; Schärer, L., Why anisogamy drives ancestral sex roles, Evolution, 70, 5, 1129-1135 (2016)
[47] Loo, SL; Chan, MH; Hawkes, K.; Kim, PS, Further mathematical modelling of mating sex ratios & male strategies with special relevance to human life history, Bull Math Biol, 79, 8, 1907-1922 (2017) · Zbl 1373.92091
[48] Loo, SL; Hawkes, K.; Kim, PS, Evolution of male strategies with sex-ratio-dependent pay-offs: connecting pair bonds with grandmothering, Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 372, 1729, 20170041 (2017)
[49] Marlowe, FW, Hunting and gathering: the human sexual division of foraging labor, Cross Cult Res, 41, 2, 170-195 (2007)
[50] Mcnamara, JM; Székely, T.; Webb, JN; Houston, AI, A dynamic game-theoretic model of parental care, J Theor Biol, 205, 4, 605-623 (2000)
[51] Parker GA (2014) The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict. In: Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, p a017509
[52] Parker, GA; Lehtonen, J., Gamete evolution and sperm numbers: sperm competition versus sperm limitation, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 281, 1791, 20140836 (2014)
[53] Parker, GA; Pizzari, T.; Hoquet, T., Sexual selection: the logical imperative, Current perspectives on sexual selection: what’s left after Darwin? Chapter 7 (2015), New York: Springer, New York
[54] Parker, GA; Baker, RR; Smith, VGF, The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon, J Theor Biol, 36, 3, 529-553 (1972)
[55] Parker, GA; Royle, NJ; Hartley, IR, Intrafamilial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis, Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 357, 1419, 295-307 (2002)
[56] Queller, DC, Why do females care more than males?, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 264, 1388, 1555-1557 (1997)
[57] Robbins, AM; Robbins, MM; Gerald-Steklis, N.; Steklis, HD, Age-related patterns of reproductive success among female mountain gorillas, Am J Phys Anthropol, 131, 4, 511-521 (2006)
[58] Robson, SL; Van Schaik, CP; Hawkes, K.; Hawkes, K.; Paine, R., The derived features of human life history, The evolution of human life history, 17-44 (2006), Sante Fe: School for Advanced Research Press, Sante Fe
[59] Rose, D.; Kristen, H.; Peter, SK, Adult sex ratio as an index for male strategy in primates, Theor Popul Biol, 126, 40-50 (2019) · Zbl 1412.92318
[60] Ryan, S.; Adrian, VB, The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity, Sci Rep, 6, 32472 (2016)
[61] Sear, R.; Mace, R., Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival, Evol Hum Behav, 29, 1, 1-18 (2008)
[62] Sellen, DW, implications for contemporary public health. Evolution of infant and young child feeding, Annu Rev Nutr, 27, 123-148 (2007)
[63] Trivers, R.; Campbell, BG, Parental investment and sexual selection, Sexual selection & the descent of man, chapter 7, 136-179 (1972), New York: Aldine de Gruyter, New York
[64] Volk, AA; Atkinson, JA, Infant and child death in the human environment of evolutionary adaptation, Evol Hum Behav, 34, 3, 182-192 (2013)
[65] Washburn, SL; Lancaster, CS; Lee, RB; DeVore, I., The evolution of hunting, Man the Hunter, chapter 32, 293-303 (1968), New York: Routledge, New York
[66] Zahavi, A., Mate selection-a selection for a handicap, J Theor Biol, 53, 1, 205-214 (1975)
[67] Zahavi, A., The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle), J Theor Biol, 67, 3, 603-605 (1977)
[68] Zahavi, A., On the definition of sexual selection, Fisher’s model, and the evolution of waste and of signals in general, Anim Behav, 42, 3, 501-503 (1991)
[69] Zahavi, A., Altruism as a handicap: the limitations of kin selection and reciprocity, J Avian Biol, 26, 1, 1-3 (1995)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.