×

Global dynamics of a mutualism-competition model with one resource and multiple consumers. (English) Zbl 1410.34142

Summary: Recent simulation modeling has shown that species can coevolve toward clusters of coexisting consumers exploiting the same limiting resource or resources, with nearly identical ratios of coefficients related to growth and mortality. This paper provides a mathematical basis for such as situation; a full analysis of the global dynamics of a new model for such a class of \(n\)-dimensional consumer-resource system, in which a set of consumers with identical growth to mortality ratios compete for the same resource and in which each consumer is mutualistic with the resource. First, we study the system of one resource and two consumers. By theoretical analysis, we demonstrate the expected result that competitive exclusion of one of the consumers can occur when the growth to mortality ratios differ. However, when these ratios are identical, the outcomes are complex. Either equilibrium coexistence or mutual extinction can occur, depending on initial conditions. When there is coexistence, interaction outcomes between the consumers can transition between effective mutualism, parasitism, competition, amensalism and neutralism. We generalize to the global dynamics of a system of one resource and multiple consumers. Changes in one factor, either a parameter or initial density, can determine whether all of the consumers either coexist or go to extinction together. New results are presented showing that multiple competing consumers can coexist on a single resource when they have coevolved toward identical growth to mortality ratios. This coexistence can occur because of feedbacks created by all of the consumers providing a mutualistic service to the resource. This is biologically relevant to the persistence of pollination-mutualisms.

MSC:

34C60 Qualitative investigation and simulation of ordinary differential equation models
34C12 Monotone systems involving ordinary differential equations
37N25 Dynamical systems in biology
34C28 Complex behavior and chaotic systems of ordinary differential equations
34D05 Asymptotic properties of solutions to ordinary differential equations
92D25 Population dynamics (general)
34C23 Bifurcation theory for ordinary differential equations
34D23 Global stability of solutions to ordinary differential equations
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Albrecht M, Padrn B, Bartomeus I, Traveset A (2014) Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species’ roles in plant – pollinator networks. Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20140773 · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0773
[2] Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant – animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:9383-987 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1633576100
[3] Bronstein JL (1994) Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 9:214-217 · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90246-1
[4] Campbell C, Yang S, Albert R, Shea K (2015) Plant – pollinator community network response to species invasion depends on both invader and community characteristics. Oikos 124:406-413 · doi:10.1111/oik.02039
[5] Cantrell RS, Cosner C, Ruan S (2004) Intraspecific interference and consumer – resource dynamics. Discrete Cont Dyn Syst B 4:527-546 · Zbl 1100.92061 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.527
[6] Fagan WF, Bewick S, Cantrell S, Cosner C, Varassin IG, Inouye DW (2014) Phenologically explicitmodelsforstudyingplant – pollinator interactions under climate change. Theor Ecol 7:289-297 · doi:10.1007/s12080-014-0218-8
[7] Freedman HI, Waltman P (1984) Persistence in models of three interacting predator – prey populations. Math Bios 68:213-231 · Zbl 0534.92026 · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(84)90032-4
[8] Gilbert, LE; Soule, Michael (ed.); Wilcox, Bruce A. (ed.), Food web organization and conservation of neotropical diversity, 11-34 (1980), Sunderland
[9] Hale JK (1969) Ordinary differential equations. Wiley, New York · Zbl 0186.40901
[10] Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · Zbl 0914.90287 · doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173179
[11] Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press
[12] Jang SR-J (2002) Dynamics of herbivore – plant – pollinator models. J Math Biol 44:129-149 · Zbl 0991.92031 · doi:10.1007/s002850100117
[13] Li B, Smith HL (2007) Global dynamics of microbial competition for two resources with internal storage competition model. J Math Biol 55:481-511 · Zbl 1125.92058 · doi:10.1007/s00285-007-0092-8
[14] Llibre J, Xiao D (2014) Global dynamics of a Lotka-Volterra model with two predators competing for one prey. SIAM J Appl Math 74:434-453 · Zbl 1303.37037 · doi:10.1137/130923907
[15] Lundberg S, Ingvarsson P (1998) Population dynamics of resource limited plants and their pollinators. Theor Popul Biol 54:44-49 · Zbl 0945.92023 · doi:10.1006/tpbi.1997.1349
[16] Memmott J, Waser NM, Price MV (2004) Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2605-2611 · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2909
[17] Nguyen DH, Yin G (2017) Coexistence and exclusion of stochastic competitive Lotka-Volterra models. J Differ Equ 262:1192-1225 · Zbl 1367.34065 · doi:10.1016/j.jde.2016.10.005
[18] Oleson JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P (2007) The modularity of pollination networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19891-19896 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706375104
[19] Perko L (2001) Differential equations and dynamical systems. Springer, New York · Zbl 0973.34001 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8
[20] Revilla T (2015) Numerical responses in resource-based mutualisms: a time scale approach. J Theor Biol 378:39-46 · Zbl 1343.92435 · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.04.012
[21] Sakavara A, Tsirtsis G, Roelke DL, Nancy R, Spatharis S (2018) Lumpy species coexistence arises robustly in fluctuating resource environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:738-743 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705944115
[22] Scheffer AM, van Nes EH (2006) Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:6230-6235 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508024103
[23] Scheffer M, van Nes EH, Vergnon R (2018) Toward a unifying theory of biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:639-641 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1721114115
[24] Terry I (2001) Thrips and weevils as dual, specialist pollinators of the Australian cycad Macrozamia communis (Zamiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:1293-1305 · doi:10.1086/321929
[25] Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton
[26] Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disrupters of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208-215 · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006
[27] Vanbergen AJ (2013) Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Front Ecol Environ 11:251-259 · doi:10.1890/120126
[28] Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Heard MS, Chapman DS (2017) Network size, structure and mutualisms dependence affect the propensity for plant – pollinator extinction cascades. Funct Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12823 · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12823
[29] Wang Y, DeAngelis DL (2016) Stability of an intraguild predation system with mutual predation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 33:141-159 · Zbl 1510.92189 · doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.09.004
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.