×

An introduction to the Symposium on behavioral game theory. (English) Zbl 1125.91306

Summary: This article introduces the articles contained in the symposium on behavioral game theory. I break economic experiments studying game theory into three broad classes: \((1)\) experiments studying and possibly modifying the assumptions that serve as foundations for game theory; \((2)\) experiments that perform economic engineering, testing existing institutions with the aim of designing better ones; and \((3)\) experiments designed to test theories which apply game theory to fields such as industrial organization.

MSC:

91A12 Cooperative games
91-06 Proceedings, conferences, collections, etc. pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance
00B15 Collections of articles of miscellaneous specific interest
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ausubel L.M. (2004) An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. Am Econ Rev 94: 1452–1475 · doi:10.1257/0002828043052330
[2] Aumann R. (1974) Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. J Mathe Econ 1, 67–96 · Zbl 0297.90106 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90037-8
[3] Bagwell K., Ramey G. (1996) Capacity, entry and forward induction. RAND J Econ 27, 660–680 · doi:10.2307/2555876
[4] Brandenburger A. (1992) Knowledge and equilibrium in games. J Econ Perspect 6, 83–101
[5] Brandts, J., Cabrales, A., Charness, G.: Forward induction and entry deterrence: an experiment. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) doi:10.1007/s00199-006-0145-z (2007)
[6] Brandts J., MacLeod W.B. (1995) Equilibrium selection in experimental games with recommended play. Games Econ Behav 11, 36–63 · Zbl 0839.90149 · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1040
[7] Camerer C. (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, Princeton University Press · Zbl 1019.91001
[8] Camerer C., Ho T. (1999) Experience-weighted attraction in games. Econometrica 67, 827–874 · Zbl 1055.91504 · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00054
[9] Camerer C., Ho T., Chong J. (2002) Sophisticated experience- weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. J Econ Theory 104, 137–188 · Zbl 1015.91011 · doi:10.1006/jeth.2002.2927
[10] Cason, T.N., Sharma, T.: Recommended play and correlated equilibria: an experimental study. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) doi:10.1007/s00199-006-0155-x (2007) · Zbl 1121.91301
[11] Chen Y. (2003) An experimental study of the serial and average cost pricing mechanisms. J Public Econ 87(9/10): 2305–2335 · doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00017-8
[12] Chen, Y., Razzolini, L., Turocy, T.: Congestion allocation for distributed networks: an experimental study. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) doi:10.1007/s00199-007-0213-z (2007)
[13] Cinyabuguma M., Page T., Putterman L. (2004) On perverse and second-order punishment in public goods experiments with decentralized sanctioning. Working paper, Brown University
[14] Cinyabuguma M., Page T., Putterman L. (2005) Can second order punishment deter perverse punishment. Working paper, Brown University
[15] Cooper, D.J., Fang, H.: Understanding overbidding in second price auctions: an experimental study. Working paper (2006)
[16] Cooper D.J., Kagel J.H., Lo W., Gu Q.L. (1999) Gaming against managers in incentive systems: experimental results with Chinese students and Chinese managers. Am Econ Rev 89(4): 781–804 · doi:10.1257/aer.89.4.781
[17] Cooper, D.J., Kagel, J.H.: Learning and transfer in signaling games. Econ Theory doi:10.1007/s00199-006-0192-5 (2007) · Zbl 1142.91356
[18] Dana, J., Weber, R., Kuang, J.: Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) (2007) · Zbl 1121.91327
[19] Denant-Boemont, L., Masclet, D., Noussair, C.N.: Punishment, counterpunishment and sanction enforcement in a social dilemma experiment. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) (2007) · Zbl 1121.91328
[20] Dixit A. (1980) The role of investment in entry deterrence. Econ J 90: 95–106 · doi:10.2307/2231658
[21] Dufwenberg, M., Gneezy, U., Goeree, J., Nagel, R.: Price floors and competition. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) (2007) · Zbl 1122.91025
[22] Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., Katok, E.: Regret in auctions: theory and evidence. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) (2007) · Zbl 1122.91030
[23] Erev I., Roth A.E. (1998) Predicting how people play games: reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Am Econ Rev 88(4): 848–881
[24] Erev, I., Roth, A.E., Slonim, R.L., Barron, G.: Learning and equilibrium as useful approximations: accuracy of prediction on randomly selected constant sum games. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) (2007) · Zbl 1121.91329
[25] Fehr E., Gaechter S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev 90(4): 980–994 · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980
[26] Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Organiz 3(4): 367–388 · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
[27] Kagel J.H. (1995) ”Auctions”. In: Kagel J.H., Roth A.E. (eds) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 501–585
[28] Kagel J.H., Levin D., Harstad R. (1987) Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: a laboratory study. Econometrica 55(6): 1275–1304 · doi:10.2307/1913557
[29] Kagel, J.H., Pevnitskaya, S., Ye, L.: Survival auctions. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) doi:10.1007/s00199-006-0156-9 (2007)
[30] Luce D. (1959) Individual Choice Behavior. New York, Wiley · Zbl 0093.31708
[31] Moreno D., Wooders J. (1998) An experimental study of communication and coordination in noncooperative games. Games Econ Behav 24, 47–76 · Zbl 0910.90270 · doi:10.1006/game.1997.0624
[32] Nikiforakis, N.S.: Punishment and counter-punishment in public goods games: can we still govern ourselves? Working paper, Royal Holloway University of London (2004)
[33] Potters J., Sefton M., Vesterlund L. (2005) After You–endogenous sequencing in voluntary contribution games. J Public Econ 89, 1399–1419 · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.02.008
[34] Potters, J., Sefton, M., Vesterlund, L.: Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) doi:10.1007/s00199-006-0186-3 (2007) · Zbl 1121.91311
[35] Razzolini L., Reksulak M., Dorsey R. (1999) An experimental evaluation of the serial cost sharing rule. manuscript, University of Mississippi · Zbl 1206.91018
[36] Salmon T.C. (2001) An evaluation of econometric models of adaptive learning. Econometrica 69(6): 1597–1628 · Zbl 1019.91009 · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00258
[37] Seely B., Van Huyck J., Battalio R. (2005) Credible assignments can improve efficiency in laboratory public goods games. J Public Econ 89, 1437–1455 · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.02.010
[38] Van Huyck, J.B., Battalio, R.C., Rankin, F.W.: Selection dynamics and adaptive behavior without much information. Econ Theor 33 (in this issue) doi:10.1007/s00199-007-0209-8 (2007) · Zbl 1121.91310
[39] Van Huyck J., Gillette A., Battalio R. (1992) Credible assignments in coordination games. Games Econ Behav 4, 606–626 · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(92)90040-Y
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.