×

Mixed oligopoly, cost-reducing research and development, and privatisation. (English) Zbl 1441.91043

Summary: We develop a mixed oligopoly model to examine the role of R&D subsidies and evaluate the welfare effects of privatisation. In solving the oligopoly model, we propose a novel use of aggregative games techniques. Our analysis reveals that privatisation reduces the optimal R&D subsidy. Furthermore, privatisation improves social welfare but only when the number of firms is sufficiently large. Implementing solely a subsidy to R&D does not lead to a ‘privatisation neutrality theorem’ or ‘irrelevance result’.

MSC:

91B54 Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand)
91B38 Production theory, theory of the firm

References:

[1] Aanestad, P. D.M.; Mørk, B. E.; Grisot, M.; Hanseth, O., Knowledge as a barrier to learning: a case study from medical R&D, Proceedings of the IESE business school 4th european conference on organisational knowledge, learning and capabilities. 2003. (2003), Citeseer
[2] Aggarwal, V. K.; Evenett, S. J., Industrial policy choice during the crisis era, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 2, 261-283 (2012)
[3] Research Paper 1175.
[4] Avi-Yonah, R. S.; Vallespinos, M., The elephant always forgets: Us tax reform and the wto, U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper, 18-006 (2018)
[5] Boeing, P., The allocation and effectiveness of china’s r&d subsidies-evidence from listed firms, Research Policy, 45, 9, 1774-1789 (2016)
[6] Boonman, H. J.; Hagspiel, V.; Kort, P. M., Dedicated vs product flexible production technology: Strategic capacity investment choice, European Journal of Operational Research, 244, 1, 141-152 (2015) · Zbl 1346.91121
[7] Cato, S.; Matsumura, T., Long-run effects of tax policies in a mixed market, FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 69, 2, 215-240 (2013)
[8] Cin, B. C.; Kim, Y. J.; Vonortas, N. S., The impact of public r&d subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from korean smes, Small Business Economics, 48, 2, 345-360 (2017)
[9] Cornes, R., Aggregative environmental games, Environmental and Resource Economics, 63, 339-365 (2016)
[10] DP 00/23
[11] Cornes, R.; Hartley, R., Risk aversion, heterogeneity and contests, Public Choice, 117, 1-2, 1-25 (2003)
[12] Cornes, R., & Hartley, R. (2010). Well-behaved aggregative games. mimeo.
[13] Dasgupta, P.; Stiglitz, J., Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity, The Economic Journal, 90, 358, 266-293 (1980)
[14] De Fraja, G.; Delbono, F., Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly, Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 2, 302-311 (1989)
[15] Delbono, F.; Denicolò, V., Regulating innovative activity: the role of a public firm, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11, 1, 35-48 (1993)
[16] Duan, L., Mixed oligopoly model for enterprise privatization without subsidies, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 8, 2, 79-83 (2013)
[17] Einiö, E., R&d subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the erdf population-density rule, Review of Economics and Statistics, 96, 4, 710-728 (2014)
[18] Fruchter, G. E., The many-player advertising game, Management Science, 45, 11, 1609-1611 (1999) · Zbl 0943.91015
[19] Gil-Moltó, M. J.; Poyago-Theotoky, J.; Zikos, V., R&D subsidies, spillovers, and privatization in mixed markets, Southern Economic Journal, 78, 1, 233-255 (2011)
[20] Grishagin, V. A.; Sergeyev, Y. D.; Silipo, D., Firms’ R&D decisions under incomplete information, European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 2, 414-433 (2001) · Zbl 0980.90040
[21] Haraguchi, J.; Matsumura, T., Cournot-bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly, Journal of Economics, 117, 2, 117-136 (2016) · Zbl 1408.91147
[22] Haraguchi, J.; Matsumura, T., Multiple Long-Run Equilibria in a Free-Entry Mixed Oligopoly, MPRA Paper (2018), University Library of Munich, Germany
[23] Haraguchi, J.; Matsumura, T.; Yoshida, S., Competitive pressure from neighboring markets and optimal privatization policy, Japan and The World Economy, 46, 1-8 (2018)
[24] Hart, D., US technology policy: New tools for new times, NIRA Review, Summer, 3-6 (1998)
[25] Haruna, S.; Goel, R. K., R&D strategy in international mixed duopoly with research spillovers, Australian Economic Papers, 54, 2, 88-103 (2015)
[26] Heywood, J. S.; Ye, G., Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly with an R&D rivalry, Bulletin of Economic Research, 61, 2, 165-178 (2009) · Zbl 1168.91425
[27] Hud, M.; Hussinger, K., The impact of r&d subsidies during the crisis, Research Policy, 44, 10, 1844-1855 (2015)
[28] Ishibashi, I.; Matsumura, T., R&D competition between public and private sectors, European Economic Review, 50, 6, 1347-1366 (2006)
[29] Jensen, M. K., Aggregative games and best-reply potentials, Economic Theory, 43, 1, 45-66 (2010) · Zbl 1185.91053
[30] Kalashnikov, V.; Cordero, A. E.; Kalashnikov, V., Cournot and Stackelberg equilibrium in mixed duopoly models, Optimization, 59, 5, 689-706 (2010) · Zbl 1194.91109
[31] Kalashnikov, V.; Kemfert, C.; Kalashnikov, V., Conjectural variations equilibrium in a mixed duopoly, European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 3, 717-729 (2009) · Zbl 1157.91345
[32] Kalashnikov, V. V.; Bulavsky, V. A.; Kalashnykova, N. I.; Castillo, F. J., Mixed oligopoly with consistent conjectures, European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 3, 729-735 (2011) · Zbl 1213.91068
[33] Katz, J., Structural reforms and technological behaviour: The sources and nature of technological change in latin america in the 1990s, Research Policy, 30, 1, 1-19 (2001)
[34] Kesavayuth, D.; Zikos, V., R&D versus output subsidies in mixed markets, Economics Letters, 118, 2, 293-296 (2013)
[35] Leahy, D.; Neary, J. P., Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries, The American Economic Review, 87, 4, 642-662 (1997)
[36] Lee, S.; Tomaru, Y., Output and R&D subsidies in a mixed oligopoly, Operations Research Letters, 45, 3, 238-241 (2017) · Zbl 1409.91122
[37] Lin, M. H.; Matsumura, T., Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy, Journal of Economics, 107, 1, 71-80 (2012) · Zbl 1294.91085
[38] Matsumura, T., Partial privatization in mixed duopoly, Journal of Public Economics, 70, 3, 473-483 (1998)
[39] Matsumura, T.; Matsushima, N., Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: a mixed duopoly approach, Economica, 71, 284, 671-688 (2004)
[40] Matsumura, T.; Okamura, M., Competition and privatization policies revisited: the payoff interdependence approach, Journal of Economics, 116, 2, 137-150 (2015) · Zbl 1402.91307
[41] Matsumura, T.; Shimizu, D., Privatization waves, The Manchester School, 78, 6, 609-625 (2010)
[42] Murto, P.; Näsäkkälä, E.; Keppo, J., Timing of investments in oligopoly under uncertainty: A framework for numerical analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 157, 2, 486-500 (2004) · Zbl 1106.91352
[43] Nocke, V.; Schutz, N., Multiproduct-firm oligopoly: An aggregative games approach, Econometrica, 86, 2, 523-557 (2018) · Zbl 1419.91470
[44] OECD, O., Science, technology and innovation outlook 2018, Adapting to Technological and Societal Disruption (2018)
[45] Oehmke, J. F., Biotechnology R&D races, industry structure, and public and private sector research orientation, AgBioForum, 4, 105-114 (2001)
[46] Poyago-Theotoky, J., R&D competition in a mixed duopoly under uncertainty and easy imitation, Journal of Comparative Economics, 26, 3, 415-428 (1998)
[47] Poyago-Theotoky, J., Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: an irrelevance result, Economics Bulletin, 12, 3, 1-5 (2001)
[48] Shin, W.; Lee, W., Legality of r&d subsidies and its policy framework under the world trading system: The case of civil aircraft disputes, STI Policy Review, 4 (2013)
[49] White, M. D., Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization, Economics Letters, 53, 2, 189-195 (1996) · Zbl 0896.90028
[50] White, M. D., Political manipulation of a public firm’s objective function, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49, 4, 487-499 (2002)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.