×

Combining the endogenous choice of timing and competition version in a mixed duopoly. (English) Zbl 1408.91144

Summary: This paper extends [the second author, Econ. Lett. 120, No. 3, 364–368 (2013; Zbl 1284.91346)] concept combining the endogenous choice of timing and competition version from a pure duopoly model to a mixed duopoly model. We find that choosing a price contract and playing in the first period make up a dominant strategy for the private firm. The public firm’s best response to the private firm’s dominant strategy is also to choose a price contract and play in the first period. As a result, simultaneous price competition is the unique equilibrium outcome, no matter whether the goods are substitutes or complements. Combining the findings in [loc. cit.], we present that simultaneous price competition is the unique result with complement products, irrespective of whether for a pure duopoly model or for a mixed duopoly model.

MSC:

91B54 Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand)
91A20 Multistage and repeated games

Citations:

Zbl 1284.91346
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Anderson, SP; Engers, M, Strategic investment and timing of entry, Int Econ Rev, 35, 833-853, (1994) · Zbl 0812.90030 · doi:10.2307/2527000
[2] Bárcena-Ruiz, J, Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition, J Econ, 91, 263-272, (2007) · Zbl 1180.91144 · doi:10.1007/s00712-007-0255-5
[3] Bárcena-Ruiz, J; Garzón, MB, Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with semipublic firms, Port Econ J, 9, 97-113, (2010) · doi:10.1007/s10258-010-0054-8
[4] Fraja, G; Delbono, F, Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly, Oxf Econ Pap, 41, 302-311, (1989)
[5] Dixit, AK, A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers, Bell J Econ, 10, 20-32, (1979) · doi:10.2307/3003317
[6] Fjell, K; Pal, D, A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms, Can J Econ, 29, 737-743, (1996) · doi:10.2307/136260
[7] Hamilton, J; Slutsky, S, Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria, Games Econ Behav, 2, 29-46, (1990) · Zbl 0753.90074 · doi:10.1016/0899-8256(90)90012-J
[8] Haraguchi, J; Matsumura, T, Price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly with foreign penetration, Res Econ, 68, 338-353, (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.rie.2014.09.001
[9] Haraguchi J, Matsumura T (2015) Cournot-Bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly. J Econ. doi:10.1007/s00712-015-0452-6 · Zbl 1408.91147
[10] Klemperer, P; Meyer, M, Price competition vs. quantity competition: the role of uncertainty, Rand J Econ, 17, 618-638, (1986) · doi:10.2307/2555486
[11] Lambertini, L, Extended games played by managerial firms, Jap Econ Rev, 51, 274-283, (2000) · doi:10.1111/1468-5876.00152
[12] Lambertini, L, Strategic delegation and the shape of market competition, Scott J Polit Econ, 47, 550-570, (2000) · doi:10.1111/1467-9485.00178
[13] Lu, Y, Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors: the linear demand case, J Econ, 88, 49-68, (2006) · Zbl 1293.91119 · doi:10.1007/s00712-006-0186-6
[14] Maggi, G, Strategic trade policies with endogenous mode of competition, Am Econ Rev, 86, 237-258, (1996)
[15] Matsumura, T, Quantity-setting oligopoly with endogenous sequencing, Int J Ind Organ, 17, 289-296, (1999) · doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00021-6
[16] Matsumura, T, Market instability in a Stackelberg duopoly, J Econ, 75, 199-210, (2002) · Zbl 1010.91043 · doi:10.1007/s007120200016
[17] Matsumura, T; Ogawa, A, On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly, Austr Econ Pap, 49, 149-160, (2010) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.2010.00393.x
[18] Matsumura, T; Ogawa, A, Price versus quantity in a mixed duopoly, Econ Lett, 116, 174-177, (2012) · Zbl 1253.91113 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.02.012
[19] Matsumura, T; Ogawa, A, Corporate social responsibility or payoff asymmetry? A study of an endogenous timing game, South Econ J, 81, 457-473, (2014) · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2012.182
[20] Matsumura, T; Okamura, M, Competition and privatization policies revisited: the payoff interdependence approach, J Econ, 116, 137-150, (2015) · Zbl 1402.91307 · doi:10.1007/s00712-015-0445-5
[21] Naya, JM, Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly model, J Econ, 116, 165-174, (2015) · Zbl 1402.91309 · doi:10.1007/s00712-014-0416-2
[22] Pal, D, Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly, Econ Lett, 61, 181-185, (1998) · Zbl 0912.90041 · doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00115-3
[23] Scrimitore, M, Price or quantity? the strategic choice of subsidized firms in a mixed duopoly, Econ Lett, 118, 337-341, (2013) · Zbl 1268.91104 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.11.015
[24] Singh, N; Vives, X, Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly, Rand J Econ, 15, 546-554, (1984) · doi:10.2307/2555525
[25] Sun, CH, Combining the endogenous choice of price/quantity and timing, Econ Lett, 120, 364-368, (2013) · Zbl 1284.91346 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.013
[26] Tanaka, Y, Profitability of price and quantity strategies in an oligopoly, J Math Econ, 35, 409-418, (2001) · Zbl 0991.91008 · doi:10.1016/S0304-4068(00)00072-0
[27] Tanaka, Y, Profitability of price and quantity strategies in a duopoly with vertical product differentiation, Econ Theory, 17, 693-700, (2001) · Zbl 1013.91515 · doi:10.1007/PL00004124
[28] Tasnádi, A, Price vs. quantity in oligopoly games, Int J Ind Organ, 24, 541-554, (2006) · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.009
[29] Thisse, JF; Vives, X, On the strategic choice of spatial price policy, Am Econ Rev, 78, 122-137, (1988)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.