×

Surface gravity wave effects in the oceanic boundary layer: Large-eddy simulation with vortex force and stochastic breakers. (English) Zbl 1151.76514

Summary: The wind-driven stably stratified mid-latitude oceanic surface turbulent boundary layer is computationally simulated in the presence of a specified surface gravity-wave field. The gravity waves have broad wavenumber and frequency spectra typical of measured conditions in near-equilibrium with the mean wind speed. The simulation model is based on (i) an asymptotic theory for the conservative dynamical effects of waves on the wave-averaged boundary-layer currents and (ii) a boundary-layer forcing by a stochastic representation of the impulses and energy fluxes in a field of breaking waves. The wave influences are shown to be profound on both the mean current profile and turbulent statistics compared to a simulation without these wave influences and forced by an equivalent mean surface stress. As expected from previous studies with partial combinations of these wave influences, Langmuir circulations due to the wave-averaged vortex force make vertical eddy fluxes of momentum and material concentration much more efficient and non-local (i.e. with negative eddy viscosity near the surface), and they combine with the breakers to increase the turbulent energy and dissipation rate. They also combine in an unexpected positive feedback in which breaker-generated vorticity seeds the creation of a new Langmuir circulation and instigates a deep strong intermittent downwelling jet that penetrates through the boundary layer and increases the material entrainment rate at the base of the layer. These wave effects on the boundary layer are greater for smaller wave ages and higher mean wind speeds.

MSC:

76F40 Turbulent boundary layers
76F65 Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence
76F55 Statistical turbulence modeling
86A05 Hydrology, hydrography, oceanography
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2004)0342.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2004)0342.0.CO;2
[2] DOI: 10.1029/95JC01405 · doi:10.1029/95JC01405
[3] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1989)0462.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1989)0462.0.CO;2
[4] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1990)0472.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1990)0472.0.CO;2
[5] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)0412.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1984)0412.0.CO;2
[6] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112001007078 · Zbl 0987.76507 · doi:10.1017/S0022112001007078
[7] DOI: 10.1038/417058a · doi:10.1038/417058a
[8] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001431 · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001431
[9] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1994)0242.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1994)0242.0.CO;2
[10] Melsom, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 34 pp 490– (2004) · doi:10.1175/2496.1
[11] Mellor, Rev. Geophys. 20 pp 851– (1982)
[12] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112096004375 · Zbl 0887.76029 · doi:10.1017/S0022112096004375
[13] DOI: 10.1016/S1353-2561(01)00041-X · doi:10.1016/S1353-2561(01)00041-X
[14] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004009358 · Zbl 1067.76012 · doi:10.1017/S0022112004009358
[15] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1999)0292.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1999)0292.0.CO;2
[16] DOI: 10.1175/JPO2912.1 · doi:10.1175/JPO2912.1
[17] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001243 · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001243
[18] DOI: 10.1007/BF00708935 · doi:10.1007/BF00708935
[19] Longuet-Higgins, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 342 pp 157– (1975)
[20] Loewen, J. Fluid Mech. 2 pp 297– (1990)
[21] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1979)0362.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1979)0362.0.CO;2
[22] DOI: 10.1063/1.869048 · Zbl 1027.76603 · doi:10.1063/1.869048
[23] DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2004.09.004 · doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2004.09.004
[24] DOI: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2003.11.001 · doi:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2003.11.001
[25] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.002135 · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.002135
[26] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1982)0122.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1982)0122.0.CO;2
[27] DOI: 10.1029/94RG01872 · doi:10.1029/94RG01872
[28] DOI: 10.1038/351469a0 · doi:10.1038/351469a0
[29] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1983)1112.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1983)1112.0.CO;2
[30] Kenyon, J. Geophys. Res. 74 pp 6991– (1969)
[31] DOI: 10.1007/s007730070002 · doi:10.1007/s007730070002
[32] DOI: 10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00062-8 · doi:10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00062-8
[33] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112002001945 · Zbl 1163.76327 · doi:10.1017/S0022112002001945
[34] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1999)0292.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1999)0292.0.CO;2
[35] DOI: 10.1126/science.1100849 · doi:10.1126/science.1100849
[36] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)0162.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2003)0162.0.CO;2
[37] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1988)0182.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1988)0182.0.CO;2
[38] DOI: 10.1063/1.2204981 · Zbl 1185.76710 · doi:10.1063/1.2204981
[39] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1983)0132.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1983)0132.0.CO;2
[40] Tsai, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28 pp 249– (1996) · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001341
[41] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112097007623 · Zbl 0920.76059 · doi:10.1017/S0022112097007623
[42] DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.052203.071431 · Zbl 1076.76075 · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.052203.071431
[43] DOI: 10.1038/44326 · doi:10.1038/44326
[44] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1996)0262.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1996)0262.0.CO;2
[45] Donelan, J. Geophys. Res. 92 pp 4971– (1987)
[46] DOI: 10.1038/239449a0 · doi:10.1038/239449a0
[47] DOI: 10.1029/2004GL019460 · doi:10.1029/2004GL019460
[48] DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1985.0054 · doi:10.1098/rsta.1985.0054
[49] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1996)0262.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1996)0262.0.CO;2
[50] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)0552.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1998)0552.0.CO;2
[51] DOI: 10.1007/BF00119016 · doi:10.1007/BF00119016
[52] DOI: 10.1357/0022240943076984 · doi:10.1357/0022240943076984
[53] DOI: 10.1007/BF00713741 · doi:10.1007/BF00713741
[54] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004008882 · Zbl 1134.76331 · doi:10.1017/S0022112004008882
[55] DOI: 10.1007/s10236-002-0012-9 · doi:10.1007/s10236-002-0012-9
[56] DOI: 10.1029/94JC03202 · doi:10.1029/94JC03202
[57] DOI: 10.1063/1.858537 · Zbl 0781.76044 · doi:10.1063/1.858537
[58] DOI: 10.1029/2005JC003004 · doi:10.1029/2005JC003004
[59] DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1990.0098 · doi:10.1098/rsta.1990.0098
[60] Price, J. Geophys. Res. 91 pp 8411– (1986)
[61] DOI: 10.1038/nature01481 · doi:10.1038/nature01481
[62] DOI: 10.1175/JPO2633.1 · doi:10.1175/JPO2633.1
[63] Pierson, J. Geophys. Res. 69 pp 5181– (1964)
[64] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112002001908 · Zbl 1152.76338 · doi:10.1017/S0022112002001908
[65] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112085002221 · Zbl 0603.76013 · doi:10.1017/S0022112085002221
[66] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112076001420 · Zbl 0324.76014 · doi:10.1017/S0022112076001420
[67] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1994)0242.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1994)0242.0.CO;2
[68] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112003006074 · Zbl 1065.76090 · doi:10.1017/S0022112003006074
[69] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112097005740 · Zbl 0909.76011 · doi:10.1017/S0022112097005740
[70] DOI: 10.1017/S0022112098001128 · Zbl 0979.76502 · doi:10.1017/S0022112098001128
[71] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1990)0202.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1990)0202.0.CO;2
[72] DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6275 · Zbl 0965.76058 · doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6275
[73] DOI: 10.1175/JPO2862.1 · doi:10.1175/JPO2862.1
[74] DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2003)0332.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2003)0332.0.CO;2
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.