×

Global receptivity analysis: physically realizable input-output analysis. (English) Zbl 1527.76013

Summary: In the context of transition analysis, linear input-output analysis determines the worst-case disturbances to a laminar base flow based on a generic right-hand-side volumetric/boundary forcing term. The worst-case forcing is not physically realizable, and, to our knowledge, a generic framework for posing physically realizable worst-case disturbance problems is lacking. In natural receptivity analysis, disturbances are forced by matching (typically local) solutions within the boundary layer to outer solutions consisting of free-stream vortical, entropic and acoustic disturbances. We pose a scattering formalism to restrict the input forcing to a set of realizable disturbances associated with plane-wave solutions of the outer problem. The formulation is validated by comparing with direct numerical simulations of a Mach 4.5 flat-plate boundary layer. We show that the method provides insight into transition mechanisms by identifying those linear combinations of plane-wave disturbances that maximize energy amplification over a range of frequencies. We also discuss how the framework can be extended to accommodate scattering from shocks and in shock layers for supersonic flow.

MSC:

76E05 Parallel shear flows in hydrodynamic stability
76N20 Boundary-layer theory for compressible fluids and gas dynamics
76J20 Supersonic flows
76N06 Compressible Navier-Stokes equations

References:

[1] Bae, H.J., Dawson, S.T.M. & Mckeon, B.J.2020Resolvent-based study of compressibility effects on supersonic turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech.883, A29. · Zbl 1430.76261
[2] Balakumar, P.2015 Receptivity of hypersonic boundary layers to acoustic and vortical disturbances (Invited). AIAA Paper 2015-2473.
[3] Bugeat, B., Chassaing, J.-C., Robinet, J.-C. & Sagaut, P.20193D global optimal forcing and response of the supersonic boundary layer. J. Comput. Phys.398, 108888. · Zbl 1453.76194
[4] Chu, B.-T.1965On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow (Part I). Acta Mechanica1 (3), 215-234.
[5] Cook, D.A., Knutson, A., Nichols, J.W. & Candler, G.V.2020 Matrix methods for input-output analysis of 2D and 3D hypersonic flows. AIAA Paper 2020-1820.
[6] Cook, D.A. & Nichols, J.W.2022Free-stream receptivity of a hypersonic blunt cone using input-output analysis and a shock-kinematic boundary condition. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.36 (1), 155-180.
[7] Crouch, J.D.1992Non-localized receptivity of boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech.244, 567-581. · Zbl 0775.76158
[8] Duck, P.W., Ruban, A.I. & Zhikharev, C.N.1996The generation of Tollmien-Schlichting waves by free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.312, 341-371. · Zbl 0862.76019
[9] Fedorov, A.V.2003Receptivity of a high-speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances. J. Fluid Mech.491, 101-129. · Zbl 1063.76552
[10] Fedorov, A.V. & Khokhlov, A.P.2001Prehistory of instability in a hypersonic boundary layer. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.14 (6), 359-375. · Zbl 1046.76016
[11] Goldstein, M.E.1983The evolution of Tollmien-Sclichting waves near a leading edge. J. Fluid Mech.127, 59-81. · Zbl 0524.76046
[12] Jeun, J., Nichols, J.W. & Jovanović, M.R.2016Input-output analysis of high-speed axisymmetric isothermal jet noise. Phys. Fluids28 (4), 047101.
[13] Kamal, O., Rigas, G., Lakebrink, M.T. & Colonius, T.2021 Input/output analysis of hypersonic boundary layers using the One-Way Navier-Stokes (OWNS) equations. AIAA Paper 2021-2827.
[14] Lugrin, M., Beneddine, S., Leclercq, C., Garnier, E. & Bur, R.2021Transition scenario in hypersonic axisymmetrical compression ramp flow. J. Fluid Mech.907, A6. · Zbl 1461.76214
[15] Ma, Y. & Zhong, X.2003aReceptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 1. Wave structures and interactions. J. Fluid Mech.488, 31-78. · Zbl 1063.76544
[16] Ma, Y. & Zhong, X.2003bReceptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 2. Receptivity to free-stream sound. J. Fluid Mech.488, 79-121. · Zbl 1063.76545
[17] Ma, Y. & Zhong, X.2005Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 3. Effects of different types of free-stream disturbances. J. Fluid Mech.532, 63-109. · Zbl 1125.76360
[18] Malik, M.R.1990Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability. J. Comput. Phys.86 (2), 376-413. · Zbl 0682.76043
[19] Mckenzie, J.F. & Westphal, K.O.1968Interaction of linear waves with oblique shock waves. Phys. Fluids11 (11), 2350-2362. · Zbl 0172.53203
[20] Monokrousos, A., Åkervik, E., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D.S.2010Global three-dimensional optimal disturbances in the Blasius boundary-layer flow using time-steppers. J. Fluid Mech.650, 181-214. · Zbl 1189.76192
[21] Nichols, J.W. & Candler, G.V.2019 Input-output analysis of complex hypersonic boundary layers. AIAA Paper 2019-1383.
[22] Nichols, J.W. & Lele, S.K.2011Global modes and transient response of a cold supersonic jet. J. Fluid Mech.669, 225-241. · Zbl 1225.76116
[23] Qin, F. & Wu, X.2016Response and receptivity of the hypersonic boundary layer past a wedge to free-stream acoustic, vortical and entropy disturbances. J. Fluid Mech.797, 874-915. · Zbl 1422.76119
[24] Ruban, A.I., Keshari, S.K. & Kravtsova, M.A.2021On boundary-layer receptivity to entropy waves. J. Fluid Mech.929, A17. · Zbl 1481.76096
[25] Schmidt, O.T., Towne, A., Rigas, G., Colonius, T. & Brès, G.A.2018Spectral analysis of jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech.855, 953-982. · Zbl 1415.76293
[26] Schrader, L.-U., Brandt, L. & Henningson, D.S.2009Receptivity mechanisms in three-dimensional boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech.618, 209-241. · Zbl 1156.76378
[27] Skene, C.S., Yeh, C.-A., Schmid, P.J. & Taira, K.2022Sparsifying the resolvent forcing mode via gradient-based optimisation. J. Fluid Mech.944, A52. · Zbl 1500.76021
[28] Thompson, K.W.1987Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys.68 (1), 1-24. · Zbl 0619.76089
[29] Towne, A., Rigas, G., Kamal, O., Pickering, E. & Colonius, T.2022Efficient global resolvent analysis via the one-way Navier-Stokes equations. J. Fluid Mech.948, A9. · Zbl 1516.76026
[30] Trefethen, L.N., Trefethen, A.E., Reddy, S.C. & Driscoll, T.A.1993Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues. Science261 (5121), 578-584. · Zbl 1226.76013
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.