×

A type IV functional response with different shapes in a predator-prey model. (English) Zbl 1455.92124

Summary: Group defense is a phenomenon that occurs in many predator-prey systems. Different functional responses with substantially different properties representing such a mechanism exist. Here, we develop a functional response using timescale separation. A prey-dependent catch rate represents the group defense. The resulting functional response contains a single parameter that controls whether the group defense functional response is saturating or dome-shaped. Based on that, we show that the catch rate must not increase monotonically with increasing prey density to lead to a dome-shaped functional response. We apply bifurcation analysis to show that non-monotonic group defense is usually more successful. However, we also find parameter regions in which a paradox occurs. In this case, higher group defense can give rise to a stable limit cycle, while for lower values, the predator would go extinct. The study does not only provide valuable insight on how to include functional responses representing group defense in mathematical models, but it also clarifies under which circumstances the usage of different functional responses is appropriate.

MSC:

92D25 Population dynamics (general)

Software:

XPPAUT
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abrams, P. A.; Ginzburg, L. R., The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 8, 337-341 (2000)
[2] Aldebert, C.; Nerini, D.; Gauduchon, M.; Poggiale, J., Structural sensitivity and resilience in a predator-prey model with density-dependent mortality, Ecological Complexity, 28, 163-173 (2016)
[3] Allan, J. D., Predation and its consequences, (Stream Ecology (1995), Springer), 163-185
[4] Allee, W., The Social Life of Animals (1958)
[5] Andrews, J. F., A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10, 6, 707-723 (1968)
[6] Baek, H., A food chain system with Holling type IV functional response and impulsive perturbations, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 60, 5, 1152-1163 (2010) · Zbl 1201.34015
[7] Blanchard, R. J.; Blanchard, D. C.; Rodgers, J.; Weiss, S. M., The characterization and modelling of antipredator defensive behavior, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 14, 4, 463-472 (1990)
[8] Blanchard, R. J.; Flannelly, K. J.; Blanchard, D. C., Defensive behaviors of laboratory and wild Rattus norvegicus, Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100, 2, 101 (1986)
[9] Bodenstein, M., Eine Theorie der photochemischen Reaktionsgeschwindigkeiten, Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie, 85, 1, 329-397 (1913) · JFM 44.0905.03
[10] Braza, P. A., Predator-prey dynamics with square root functional responses, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 13, 4, 1837-1843 (2012) · Zbl 1254.92072
[11] Britton, N. F., Essential Mathematical Biology (2012), Springer Science & Business Media
[12] Caro, T., Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals (2005), University of Chicago Press
[13] Chen, Y., Multiple periodic solutions of delayed predator-prey systems with type IV functional responses, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 5, 1, 45-53 (2004) · Zbl 1066.92050
[14] Collings, J. B., The effects of the functional response on the bifurcation behavior of a mite predator-prey interaction model, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 36, 2, 149-168 (1997) · Zbl 0890.92021
[15] Diekmann, O.; Heesterbeek, H.; Britton, T., Mathematical Tools for Understanding Infectious Disease Dynamics, vol. 7 (2012), Princeton University Press · Zbl 1304.92009
[16] Edmunds, M., Defence in Animals: A Survey of Anti-Predator Defences (1974), Longman Publishing Group
[17] Edwards, V. H., The influence of high substrate concentrations on microbial kinetics, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 12, 5, 679-712 (1970)
[18] Ermentrout, B. (2002). Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems: a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students, vol. 14. Siam. · Zbl 1003.68738
[19] Fujii, K.; Holling, C.; Mace, P., A simple generalized model of attack by predators and parasites, Ecological Research, 1, 2, 141-156 (1986)
[20] Gross, T.; Ebenhöh, W.; Feudel, U., Enrichment and foodchain stability: the impact of different forms of predator-prey interaction, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 227, 3, 349-358 (2004) · Zbl 1439.92192
[21] Hanski, I.; Korpimäki, E., Microtine rodent dynamics in northern Europe: parameterized models for the predator-prey interaction, Ecology, 76, 3, 840-850 (1995)
[22] Holling, C., Principles of insect predation, Annual Review of Entomology, 6, 1, 163-182 (1961)
[23] Holling, C. S., The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly, The Canadian Entomologist, 91, 5, 293-320 (1959)
[24] Huang, J.-C.; Xiao, D.-M., Analyses of bifurcations and stability in a predator-prey system with Holling type-IV functional response, Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, 20, 1, 167-178 (2004) · Zbl 1062.92070
[25] Huisman, G.; De Boer, R. J., A formal derivation of the ‘Beddington’ functional response, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185, 3, 389-400 (1997)
[26] Ivlev, V. S., Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes (1961), Yale University Press: Yale University Press New Haven
[27] Jeschke, J. M., Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242, 4, 900-907 (2006) · Zbl 1447.92343
[28] Jeschke, J. M.; Kopp, M.; Tollrian, R., Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey, Ecological Monographs, 72, 1, 95-112 (2002)
[29] Jeschke, J. M.; Tollrian, R., Density-dependent effects of prey defences, Oecologia, 123, 3, 391-396 (2000)
[30] Jeschke, J. M.; Tollrian, R., Effects of predator confusion on functional responses, Oikos, 111, 3, 547-555 (2005)
[31] Klump, G.; Shalter, M., Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context; I. Factors affecting the structure of alarm signals. II. The functional significance and evolution of alarm signals, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 66, 3, 189-226 (1984)
[32] Köhnke, M., Invasion dynamics in an intraguild predation system with predator-induced defense, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 81, 10, 3754-3777 (2019) · Zbl 1427.92077
[33] Krams, I.; Bērziņš, A.; Krama, T., Group effect in nest defence behaviour of breeding pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, Animal Behaviour, 77, 2, 513-517 (2009)
[34] Lainhart, W.; Stolfa, G.; Koudelka, G. B., Shiga toxin as a bacterial defense against a eukaryotic predator, Tetrahymena thermophila, Journal of Bacteriology, 191, 16, 5116-5122 (2009)
[35] Lass, S.; Spaak, P., Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a review, Hydrobiologia, 491, 1-3, 221-239 (2003)
[36] Lian, F.; Xu, Y., Hopf bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey system with Holling type IV functional response and time delay, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 215, 4, 1484-1495 (2009) · Zbl 1187.34116
[37] Líznarová, E.; Pekár, S., Dangerous prey is associated with a type 4 functional response in spiders, Animal Behaviour, 85, 6, 1183-1190 (2013)
[38] Mezzalira, J. C.; Bonnet, O. J.; Carvalho, P. C., D. F., Fonseca, L., Bremm, C., Mezzalira, C.C., and Laca, E.A. Mechanisms and implications of a type IV functional response for short-term intake rate of dry matter in large mammalian herbivores, Journal of Animal Ecology, 86, 5, 1159-1168 (2017)
[39] Morozov, A.; Arashkevich, E., Patterns of zooplankton functional response in communities with vertical heterogeneity: a model study, Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 3, 3, 131-148 (2008) · Zbl 1337.92189
[40] Morozov, A. Y., Emergence of Holling type III zooplankton functional response: bringing together field evidence and mathematical modelling, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 265, 1, 45-54 (2010) · Zbl 1406.92676
[41] Olson, R. S.; Hintze, A.; Dyer, F. C.; Knoester, D. B.; Adami, C., Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behaviour, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10, 85, 20130305 (2013)
[42] Pekár, S., Predatory characteristics of ant-eating Zodarion spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae): potential biological control agents, Biological Control, 34, 2, 196-203 (2005)
[43] Polak, E., Optimization: Algorithms and Consistent Approximations, vol. 124 (2012), Springer Science & Business Media
[44] Scheffer, M.; De Boer, R. J., Implications of spatial heterogeneity for the paradox of enrichment, Ecology, 76, 7, 2270-2277 (1995)
[45] Segel, L. A., On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 50, 6, 579-593 (1988) · Zbl 0653.92006
[46] Shoffner, S.; Schnell, S., Approaches for the estimation of timescales in nonlinear dynamical systems: Timescale separation in enzyme kinetics as a case study, Mathematical Biosciences, 287, 122-129 (2017) · Zbl 1377.92039
[47] Sokol, W.; Howell, J., Kinetics of phenol oxidation by washed cells, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 23, 9, 2039-2049 (1981)
[48] Tener, J., Muskoxen (1965), Queen’s Printer: Queen’s Printer Ottawa
[49] Tostowaryk, W., The effect of prey defense on the functional response of Podisus modestus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to densities of the sawflies Neodiprion swainei and N. pratti banksianae (Hymenoptera: Neodiprionidae), The Canadian Entomologist, 104, 1, 61-69 (1972)
[50] Upadhyay, R. K.; Raw, S. N., Complex dynamics of a three species food-chain model with Holling type IV functional response, Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 16, 3, 353-374 (2011) · Zbl 1272.49085
[51] Wang, Q.; Dai, B.; Chen, Y., Multiple periodic solutions of an impulsive predator-prey model with Holling-type IV functional response, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49, 9-10, 1829-1836 (2009) · Zbl 1171.34341
[52] Zhang, S.; Tan, D.; Chen, L., Chaos in periodically forced Holling type II predator-prey system with impulsive perturbations, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 28, 2, 367-376 (2006) · Zbl 1083.37537
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.