×

Fault tolerant distributed portfolio optimization in smart grids. (English) Zbl 1291.93106

Summary: This work considers a portfolio of units for electrical power production and the problem of utilizing it to maintain power balance in the electrical grid. We treat the portfolio as a graph in which the nodes are distributed generators and the links are communication paths. We present a distributed optimization scheme for power balancing, where communication is allowed only between units that are linked in the graph. We include consumers with controllable consumption as an active part of the portfolio. We show that a suboptimal, but arbitrarily good power balancing, can be obtained in an uncoordinated, distributed optimization framework, and we argue that the scheme will work even if the computation time is limited. We further show that our approach can tolerate changes in the portfolio, in the sense that increasing or reducing the number of units in the portfolio requires only local updates. This ensures that units experiencing faults or need for maintenance can be removed from the graph without affecting the overall performance or convergence of the optimization. The results are illustrated by numerical case studies.

MSC:

93B35 Sensitivity (robustness)
93C95 Application models in control theory
93A30 Mathematical modelling of systems (MSC2010)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] RahimiF, IpakchiA. Demand response as a market resource under the smart grid paradigm. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grids2010; 1(1):82-88.
[2] PedersenT, AndersenP, NielsenK, StærmoseH, PedersenP. Using heat pump energy storages in the power grid. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Denver, CO, 2011; 1106-1111.
[3] Edison. Edison Project Page. (Available from: http://www.edison‐net.dk/) 2011. [Accessed on January 2014].
[4] HovgaardT, EdlundK, JørgensenJ. The potential of economic MPC for power management. Proceedings of 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Atlanta, GA, 2007; 7533-7538.
[5] Energinetdk. (Available from: www.energinet.dk). Danish Transmission System Operator. [Accessed on January 2014].
[6] Nord Pool Spot. (Available from: http://www.nordpoolspot.com/). Common Nordic Power Exchange. [Accessed on January 2014].
[7] Energinetdk. Regulation A: Principles for the Electricity Market. (Available from: www.energinet.dk) 2007. [Accessed on January 2014], Tenderconditions.
[8] XiaoL, BoydS. Fast linear iterations for distributed averaging. Systems and Control Letters2004; 53: 65-78. · Zbl 1157.90347
[9] BiegelB, AndersenP, StoustrupJ, BendtsenJ. Congestion management in a smart grid via shadow prices. Proceedings of IFAC PPPSC, Toulouse, France, 2012; 518-523.
[10] JohanssonB, JohanssonM. Primal and dual approaches to distributed cross‐layer optimization. Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2005; 113-118.
[11] JohanssonB, KeviczkyT, JohanssonM, JohanssonK. Subgradient methods and consensus algorithms for solving convex optimization problems. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico, 2008; 4185-4190.
[12] HoblosG, StaroswieckiM, AitoucheA. Optimal design of fault tolerant sensor networks. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Anchorage, 2000; 467-472.
[13] KragelundM, LethJ, WisniewskiR, JönssonU. Profit maximization of a power plant. European Journal of Control2012; 18(1):38-54. · Zbl 1297.49073
[14] WoodA, WollenbergB. Power Generation, Operation and Control (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 1984.
[15] KimJ, ShinD, ParkJ, SinghC. Atavistic genetic algorithm for economic dispatch with valve point effect. Electric Power System Research2002; 62: 201-207.
[16] JuelsgaardM, AndersenP, WisniewskiR. Minimization of distribution grid losses by consumption coordination. Proceedings of IEEE Multi‐Conference on Systems and Control, Hyderabad, 2013; 501-508.
[17] JuelsgaardM, SlothC, WisniewskiR. Low‐voltage consumption coordination for loss minimization and voltage control. Proceedings of Virtual Control Conference on Smart Grid Modeling and Control, Online conference, 2013.
[18] BoydS, VandenbergheL. Convex Optimization (1st edn). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. · Zbl 1058.90049
[19] PalomarD, ChiangM. A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications2006; 24(8):1439-1451.
[20] BertsekasD. Nonlinear Programming (2nd edn). Athena Scientific: Belmont, 2008.
[21] TereliusH, TopcuU, MurrayR. Decentralized multi‐agent optimization via dual decomposition. Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, Aug 2011; 11245-11251.
[22] XiaoL, BoydS, KimS. Distributed average consensus with least‐mean‐square deviation. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing2007; 67: 33-46. · Zbl 1109.68019
[23] AndersonW, MorleyT. Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of a graph. Linear and Multilinear Algebra1985; 18(2):141-145. · Zbl 0594.05046
[24] PasinM, FontaineS, BouchenakS. Failure detection in large scale systems: a survey. IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops, Salvador de Bahia, Brazil, December 2008; 165-168.
[25] KalewskiM, KobusinskaA, KobusinskiJ. FAST Failure detection service for large scale distributed systems. Proceedings on IEEE International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network‐based Processing, Weimar, Germany, 2009; 229-236.
[26] NedićA, BertsekasD. The effect of deterministic noise in subgradient methods. Mathematical Programming2008; 125(1):75-99. · Zbl 1205.90225
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.