×

Time consistent fiscal policies in a Ramsey economy. (English) Zbl 1283.91126

Summary: This paper revisits a well-known case of optimal fiscal policy in a Ramsey model where consumer utility is defined over consumption and public goods. We show that “normalising” the size of the population to one eliminates the scope for active policy-making since the decentralised equilibrium coincides with social planning. Then, we modify the model to allow for a population of \(N > 1\) agents, whereby restoring the role of the government as a policy-maker. Both in the Stackelberg case and in the decentralised game, we prove that optimal fiscal policy and consumption are not only time consistent but also subgame perfect.

MSC:

91B62 Economic growth models
91A23 Differential games (aspects of game theory)
91B42 Consumer behavior, demand theory

References:

[1] Alvarez, F.; Kehoe, P. J.; Neumeyer, P. A., The time consistency of optimal monetary and fiscal policies, Econometrica, 72, 541-567 (2004) · Zbl 1130.91371
[2] Barro, R. J.; Gordon, D. B., A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model, Journal of Political Economy, 91, 589-610 (1983)
[3] Barro, R. J.; Gordon, D. B., Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 101-121 (1983)
[4] Calvo, G., On the time consistency of optimal policy in a monetary economy, Econometrica, 46, 1411-1428 (1978) · Zbl 0401.90020
[5] Cellini, R.; Lambertini, L.; Leitmann, G., Degenerate feedback and time consistency in differential games, (Hofer, E. P.; Reithmeier, E., Modeling and Control of Autonomous Decision Support Based Systems. Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Dynamics and Control, Aachen, Shaker Verlag (2005)), 185-192
[6] Cohen, D.; Michel, P., How should control theory be used to calculate a time-consistent government policy?, Review of Economic Studies, 55, 263-274 (1988) · Zbl 0657.90021
[7] Dockner, E. J.; Jørgensen, S.; Long, N. V.; Sorger, G., Differential Games in Economics and Management Science (2000), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 0996.91001
[8] Karp, L.; Lee, I. H., Time-consistent policies, Journal of Economic Theory, 112, 353-364 (2003) · Zbl 1054.91060
[9] Kydland, F., Equilibrium solutions in dynamic dominant-player models, Journal of Economic Theory, 15, 307-324 (1977) · Zbl 0375.90089
[10] Kydland, F.; Prescott, E., Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 473-492 (1977)
[11] Levine, D. K.; Pesendorfer, W., When are agents negligible?, American Economic Review, 85, 1160-1170 (1995)
[12] Lucas, R. E.; Stokey, N. L., Fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 55-93 (1983)
[13] Persson, T.; Tabellini, G., Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics (1990), Harwood Academic Publishers: Harwood Academic Publishers Chur
[14] Persson, T.; Tabellini, G., Political economics, Explaining Economic Policy (2000), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA
[15] Simaan, M.; Cruz, J. B., On the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero sum games, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 11, 533-555 (1973) · Zbl 0243.90056
[16] Simaan, M.; Cruz, J. B., Additional aspects of the Stackelberg strategy in nonzero sum games, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 11, 613-626 (1973) · Zbl 0245.90039
[17] Xie, D., On time consistency: a technical issue in Stackelberg differential games, Journal of Economic Theory, 76, 412-430 (1997) · Zbl 0888.90179
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.