×

A multi-attribute method for choosing among potential alternatives with ordinal evaluation. (English) Zbl 1116.90060

Summary: Some concepts are introduced with a view to dealing with the problem of choosing the best potential alternative(s) in a multi-attribute ordinal data context. We assume that we know the possibilistic weights of attributes and ordinal evaluations of each potential alternative on all attributes. We define what we refer to as positive/negative coalitions of attributes and positiveness/negativeness numerical bags associated with each potential alternative. We also define what will be called positional advantage operators and we describe how all these concepts are used to lay the foundation for the choice method appearing in this paper.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bernardo, J. J., A linear assignment formulation of the multi-attribute purchase decision, Journal of Business Administration, 7, 2, 23-44 (1976)
[2] Cook, W. D.; Kress, M., Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference, Management Science, 31, 1, 26-32 (1985) · Zbl 0608.90003
[3] De Keyser, W.; Peeters, P., ARGUS-Outranking multicriteria method, (Paruccini, Work applying multicriteria decision aid for environmental management (1994), Kluwer Academic Publisher), 163-185
[4] Hinloopen, E.; Nijkamp, P.; Rietveld, P., Qualitative discrete multiple criteria choice models in regional planning, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13, 77-102 (1983)
[5] Larichev, O. I.; Moshkovich, H., Verbal decision analysis for unstructured problems (1997), Kluwer Academic Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publisher Boston · Zbl 1032.91564
[6] Paelinck, J. H.P., QUALIFLEX, a flexible multiple criteria method, Economics Letters, 3, 193-197 (1978)
[7] Rebaï, A., BBTOPSIS: A bag based technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 60, 143-162 (1993) · Zbl 0791.90004
[8] Rebaï, A., Canonical fuzzy bags and bag fuzzy measures as basis for MADM with mixed non-cardinal data, European Journal of Operational Research, 78, 34-48 (1994) · Zbl 0814.90055
[9] Rebaï, A.; Martel, J.-M., A fuzzy bag approach to choosing the “Best” multiattribute potential actions in a multiple judgments and non cardinal data context, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 87, 159-166 (1997)
[10] Rebaï, A.; Martel, J.-M., Rangements BBTOPSIS fondés sur des intervalles de proximités relatives avec qualification des préférences, RAIRO-Operations Research, 34, 449-465 (2000) · Zbl 0989.90092
[11] Roubens, M., Preference relations on actions and criteria in multiple decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 51-55 (1982) · Zbl 0481.90080
[12] Roy, B., Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE), Revue Française d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, 8, 57-75 (1968)
[13] Tsoukias, A.; Perny, P.; Vincke, Ph., From concordance/discordance to the modelling of positive and negative reasons in decision aiding, (Bouyssou, D.; Jacquet-Lagréze, E.; Perny, P.; Slowinski, R.; Vanderpooten, D., Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: Essays in honour of Bernard Roy (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht), 147-174 · Zbl 1059.90088
[14] Xu, X.; Martel, J.-M.; Lamond, B., A multiple criteria ranking procedure based on distance between partial preorders, European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 69-80 (2001) · Zbl 0989.90097
[15] Yager, R. R., On the theory of bags, International Journal of General Systems, 13, 23-37 (1986)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.