×

A demand aggregation approach for inventory control in two echelon supply chain under uncertainty. (English) Zbl 1486.90023

Summary: In this paper it is discussed that the demand aggregation is an effective approach for reducing inventory levels and the number of facilities under the uncertain supply and demand conditions. Therefore in this paper, an inventory control model is developed incorporating demand aggregation approach for two staged supply chain distribution network under uncertain demand conditions. The two stage of distribution network mainly consists of distributors and retailers. This inventory control model is developed as non-linear programming model with in the different alternatives of distribution networks. The main decision variables of the system are reorder point and the ordering quantity. The prime objective function in this paper is the total cost of system which mainly consists of ordering cost, inventory carrying cost, facility cost, facility operating cost and the cost of shipment. The model is solved for total cost minimization which provides the optimum inventory policy (reorder point and ordering quantity) and the minimum cost. Through this problem best alternative of distribution network is also suggested along with optimum reorder point, ordering quantity and total cost of the system. Some other vital inventory performance parameters besides of ordering quantity and reorder point are also evaluated for the system. These performance parameters are safety stocks, expected shortages per cycle, fill rates, cycle service level, average inventory etc. These performance parameters are evaluated with total cost of the system under different uncertainty levels for a desired service level. This problem also yielded the best network options in given uncertain conditions of demand and supply. This model is formulated for single product and single period. This study mainly focused on the small part of supply chain i.e. distribution network for implementing demand aggregation approach. A case study of a sugar mill distribution network has been performed for validating the industrial applications of the proposed model.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
90C30 Nonlinear programming
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Agrawal, P.: Effect of uncertain and turbulent environment on organizational design. Econ. Bus. J. Enq. Perspect. 5(1), 11-24 (2014)
[2] Angkiriwang, R., Pujawan, I.N., Santosa, B.: Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: reactive vs. proactive approaches. Prod. Manuf. Res. 2(1), 50-70 (2014)
[3] Anupindi, R., Bassok, Y.: Centralization of stocks: retailers vs. manufactures. Manag. Sci. 45(2), 178-191 (1999) · Zbl 1231.90007 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.2.178
[4] Arnold, J.R.T.: Introduction to Materials Management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)
[5] Bernstein, F., Decroix, G.A., Wang, Y.: The impact of demand aggregation through delayed component in an assemble to order system. Manag. Sci. 57(6), 1154-1171 (2011) · Zbl 1218.90081 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1340
[6] Bragila, M., Frosolini, M.: Virtual pooled inventories for equipment-intensive industries: an implementation in a paper district. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 112, 26-37 (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.010
[7] Constantin, A.: Inventory management, service level and safety stock. J. Public Adm. Finance Law X(6), 145-153 (2016)
[8] Christopher, M.: Logistic and Supply Chain Management. Pitman Pub, London (1992)
[9] Charles, J.C., Kumar, R.: A generalization of inventory pooling effect to nonnormal dependent demand. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 8(4), 351-358 (2006) · doi:10.1287/msom.1060.0117
[10] Chopra, S., Meindl, P., Kalra, D.V.: Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and operations, 5th edn, pp. 337-344. Pearson Education Inc., London (2013)
[11] Dang, V.T.: Effects of component commonality in multi-component inventory models. OPSEARCH 37(4), 294-315 (2017) · Zbl 1141.90315 · doi:10.1007/BF03398620
[12] Dai, Y., Fang, S.-C., Ling, X., Nuttle, H.L.W.: Risk pooling strategy in multi-echelon supply chain with price sensitive demand. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 67(3), 391-421 (2008) · Zbl 1222.90005 · doi:10.1007/s00186-007-0203-8
[13] Eppen, G.D.: Effects of centralization on expected costs in multi-location newsboy problem. Manag. Sci. 5(5), 498-501 (1979) · Zbl 0419.90049 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.5.498
[14] Eppen, G.; Scharge, L.; Schwarz, LB (ed.), Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demand, 51-67 (1981), Amsterdam · Zbl 0471.90044
[15] Etienne, E.C.: Supply chain responsiveness and the inventory illusion. Supply Chain Forum 6(1), 48-65 (2005) · doi:10.1080/16258312.2005.11517138
[16] Eynan, A., Fouque, T.: Benefiting from risk pooling effects: internal (component commonality) vs external (demand reshape) efforts. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 1(1), 90-99 (2005)
[17] Ferrer, G.: Open architecture, inventory pooling and maintenance modules. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 128, 393-403 (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.034
[18] Ganeshan, R.: Managing supply chain inventories: a multiple retailer, one warehouse, multiple supplier model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 59(1-3), 341-354 (1999) · doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00115-7
[19] Gaur, S., Ravindran, A.R.: A bi-criteria model for inventory aggregation problem under risk pooling. Comput. Ind. Eng. 51, 482-501 (2006) · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2006.08.009
[20] Gerchak, Y., He, Q.M.: On the relation between the benefits of risk pooling and variability of demand. IIE Trans. 35(11), 1027-1031 (2003) · doi:10.1080/07408170304399
[21] Govindan, K., Fattahi, Md, Keyvanshokooh, E.: Supply chain network design under uncertainty: a comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 263(1), 108-141 (2017) · Zbl 1380.90041 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.009
[22] Kamath, B.N., Bhattacharya, S.: Integrated inventory model for similar products under a two-echelon supply chain environment: an empirical Study. OPSEARCH 43(4), 331-357 (2006) · Zbl 1153.90315 · doi:10.1007/BF03398782
[23] Kang, J.H., Kim, Y.D.: Inventory control in a two level supply chain with risk pooling effect. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135, 116-124 (2012) · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.014
[24] Lee, H.L., Billington, C.: Managing supply chain inventories: opportunities and pitfalls. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 33(3), 65-74 (1992)
[25] Lin, C.T., Chen, C.B., Hsieh, H.J.: Effects of centralization on expected profits in a multi-location newsboy problem. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52(7), 839-841 (2001) · Zbl 1181.90016 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601077
[26] Liao, S.-H., Hsieh, C.-L., Lai, P.-J.: An evolutionary approach for multi-objective optimization of the integrated location—inventory distribution network problem in vendor-managed inventory. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(6), 6768-6776 (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.072
[27] Oeser, G.; Deshmukh, SG (ed.), Risk pooling in business logistics (2015), Cham
[28] Ouyang, L.-Y., Chang, H.C.: Mixture inventory model involving setup cost reduction with service level constraints. OPSEARCH 37(4), 327-339 (2000) · Zbl 1141.90325 · doi:10.1007/BF03398622
[29] Pal, S., Manna, D.K.: A marketing decision problem in single period stochastic inventory model. OPSEARCH 40(3), 230-240 (2003) · Zbl 1210.90011 · doi:10.1007/BF03398697
[30] Prakash, S., Kumar, S., Soni, G., Jain, V., Rathore, A.P.S.: Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 5(3), 1-28 (2018)
[31] Prakash, S., Soni, G., Rathore, A.P.S.: A grey based approach for assessment of risk associated with facility location in global supply chain. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 5(3), 419-436 (2015) · doi:10.1108/GS-12-2014-0059
[32] Reddy, G.S.N., Sarma, K.V.S.: A periodic review inventory problem with variable stock dependent demand. OPSEARCH 38(3), 332-341 (2001) · Zbl 1278.90034 · doi:10.1007/BF03398640
[33] Routroy, S., Kodali, R.: Differential evolution algorithm for supply chain inventory planning. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 16(1), 7-17 (2005) · doi:10.1108/17410380510574059
[34] Schmitt, A.J., Sun, S.A., Synder, L.V., Shen, Z.J.: Centralization vs decentralization: risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions. Omega 52, 201-212 (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.06.002
[35] Shi, J., Zhao, Y.: Component commonality under no hold-back allocation rules. Oper. Res. Lett. 42, 409-413 (2014) · Zbl 1408.90117 · doi:10.1016/j.orl.2014.06.001
[36] Sobel, MJ; Chhajed, D. (ed.); Lowe, TJ (ed.), Risk pooling, 155-174 (2008), Boston · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73699-0_9
[37] Synder, L.V., Daskin, M., Teo, C.P.: The stochastic location model with risk pooling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179, 1221-1238 (2007) · Zbl 1127.90039 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.03.076
[38] Takai, S., Sengupta, S.: An approach to evaluate the probability of component commonality. J. Mech. Des. 139(7), 74501-74507 (2017) · doi:10.1115/1.4036644
[39] Vats, P., Soni, G., Rathore, A.P.S., Purohit, J.K.: Risk pooling approach in multi-product multi-period inventory control model under uncertainty. In: 2018 International Conference on Production and Operations Management Society (POMS) (2018)
[40] Wazed, MdA, Ahmed, S., Nukman, Y.: Commonality in manufacturing resource planning issues and models: a review. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 4(2), 167-188 (2010) · doi:10.1504/EJIE.2010.031076
[41] Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C.: Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 50, 2-18 (1991) · Zbl 1403.90061 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
[42] Weng, Z.K.: Risk-pooling over demand uncertainty in the presence of product modularity. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62, 75-85 (1999) · doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00226-6
[43] Xu, K., Evers, P.T.: Managing single echelon inventories through demand aggregation and the feasibility of correlation matrix. Comput. Oper. Res. 30, 297-308 (2003) · Zbl 1029.90009 · doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00097-1
[44] Yang, H., Scharge, L.: Conditions that cause risk pooling to increase inventory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(3), 837-851 (2009) · Zbl 1157.90333 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.064
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.