Supply chain decisions and coordination under the combined effect of overconfidence and fairness concern. (English) Zbl 1435.90031
Summary: The purpose of this study was to examine the joint effect of overconfidence and fairness concern on supply chain decisions and design contracts to achieve a win-win situation within the supply chain. For this study, a centralized supply chain model was established without considering the retailers’ overconfidence and fairness concern. Furthermore, the retailers’ overconfidence and fairness concerns were introduced into the decentralized supply chain, while the Stackelberg game model between the manufacturer and the retailer was built. Furthermore, an innovative supply chain contract, i.e., buyback contract, with promotional cost sharing was designed to achieve supply chain coordination along with overconfidence and fairness concern. Finally, a numerical analysis was also conducted to analyze the effect of overconfidence, fairness concern, and the validity of the contract. The principal findings of the study include the positive correlation between retailers’ overconfidence and optimal order quantity, sales effort, expected utility, and profit. Although the order quantity and sales efforts were not affected by the fairness concern of the retailer, the contract achieved coordination with a win-win outcome when the level of overconfidence and fairness concern was moderate.
MSC:
| 90B06 | Transportation, logistics and supply chain management |
| 90B50 | Management decision making, including multiple objectives |
References:
| [1] | Ren, Y.; Croson, D. C.; Croson, R. T. A., The overconfident newsvendor, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68, 5, 496-506 (2017) · doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0103-5 |
| [2] | Cui, T. H.; Mallucci, P., Fairness ideals in distribution channels, Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 6, 969-987 (2016) · doi:10.1509/jmr.12.0093 |
| [3] | Chen, K.; Wang, X.; Huang, M.; Ching, W.-K., Salesforce contract design, joint pricing and production planning with asymmetric overconfidence sales agent, Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 13, 2, 873-899 (2017) · Zbl 1364.90016 · doi:10.3934/jimo.2016051 |
| [4] | Zheng, X. X.; Liu, Z.; Li, K. W., Cooperative game approaches to coordinating a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns, International Journal of Production Economic, 212, 92-110 (2018) |
| [5] | China Internet Watch, False Prosperity behind Double 11: Refund Rate Increased to 69 |
| [6] | Lu, C. L., P&G’s collaborative supply chain transformation, Enterprise Management, 10, 79-80 (2016) · doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2320.2016.10.030 |
| [7] | Li, M.; Petruzzi, N. C.; Zhang, J., Overconfident competing newsvendors, Management Science, 63, 8, 2637-2646 (2016) |
| [8] | Nie, T., Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts, European Journal of Operational Research, 258, 2, 491-500 (2017) · Zbl 1394.90115 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.051 |
| [9] | Du, X.; Jiang, B., Signaling through price and quality to consumers with fairness concerns, Journal of Marketing Research, 53, 6, 988-1000 (2016) · doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0323 |
| [10] | Kurz, V.; Orland, A.; Posadzy, K., Fairness versus efficiency: how procedural fairness concerns affect coordination, Experimental Economics, 21, 3, 601-626 (2018) · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9540-5 |
| [11] | Villa, S.; Castañeda, J. A., Transshipments in supply chains: a behavioral investigation, European Journal of Operational Research, 269, 2, 715-729 (2018) · Zbl 1388.90014 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.025 |
| [12] | Gu, B.; Fu, Y.; Li, Y., Fresh-keeping effort and channel performance in a fresh product supply chain with loss-averse consumers’ returns, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018 (2018) · Zbl 1427.90044 · doi:10.1155/2018/4717094 |
| [13] | Croson, D.; Croson, R.; Ren, Y., How to Manage an Overconfident Newsvendor (2008), , 2008, http://cbees.utdallas.edu/papers/CrosonRenCmsonMS2008 |
| [14] | Li, M., Overconfident distribution channels, Production and Operations Management, 28, 6, 1347-1365 (2019) · doi:10.1111/poms.12981 |
| [15] | Liu, W.; Wang, D.; Tang, O.; Zhu, D., The impacts of logistics service integrator’s overconfidence behaviour on supply chain decision under demand surge, European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 12, 4, 558-597 (2018) · doi:10.1504/ejie.2018.093634 |
| [16] | Xu, L.; Shi, X.; Du, P.; Govindan, K.; Zhang, Z., Optimization on pricing and overconfidence problem in a duopolistic supply chain, Computers & Operations Research, 101, 162-172 (2019) · Zbl 1458.90152 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2018.04.003 |
| [17] | Li, Y.; Shan, M., Advance selling decisions with overconfident consumers, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2, 3, 891-905 (2016) · Zbl 1331.90032 |
| [18] | Cui, T. H.; Raju, J. S.; Zhang, Z. J., Fairness and channel coordination, Management Science, 53, 8, 1303-1314 (2007) |
| [19] | Wu, X.; Niederhoff, J. A., Fairness in selling to the newsvendor, Production and Operations Management, 23, 11, 2002-2022 (2014) · doi:10.1111/poms.12222 |
| [20] | Chen, Z.; Ivan Su, S.-I., Social welfare maximization with the least subsidy: photovoltaic supply chain equilibrium and coordination with fairness concern, Renewable Energy, 132, 1332-1347 (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.026 |
| [21] | Liu, W.; Wang, D.; Shen, X.; Yan, X.; Wei, W., The impacts of distributional and peer-induced fairness concerns on the decision-making of order allocation in logistics service supply chain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 116, 102-122 (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2018.05.006 |
| [22] | Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Y.; Lu, R., Optimal environmental quality and price with consumer environmental awareness and retailer’s fairness concerns in supply chain, Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 1063-1079 (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.187 |
| [23] | Wang, X. L.; Hu, S. Q.; Liu, X. B., Supply coordination with option contract considering overconfidence under random demand and yields, Computer Integrated Manufacturing System, 24, 11, 2898-2908 (2018) |
| [24] | Jiang, W.; Liu, J., Inventory financing with overconfident supplier based on supply chain contract, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018 (2018) · Zbl 1427.90017 · doi:10.1155/2018/5054387 |
| [25] | Ma, P.; Wang, H.; Shang, J., Contract design for two-stage supply chain coordination: integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts, International Journal of Production Economics, 146, 2, 745-755 (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.09.004 |
| [26] | Liu, J.; Jiang, W. F.; Tang, Y. P., The supply chain coordination based on carbon reduction of overconfident manufacturer, Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Science), 42, 2, 203-207 (2018) |
| [27] | Dubey, R.; Altay, N.; Blome, C., Swift trust and commitment: the missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination?, Annals of Operations Research, 283, 1-2, 159-177 (2019) · doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2676-z |
| [28] | Cui, C.; Feng, Z.; Tan, C., Credibilistic loss aversion nash equilibrium for bimatrix games with triangular fuzzy payoffs, Complexity, 2018 (2018) · Zbl 1407.91017 · doi:10.1155/2018/7143586 |
| [29] | Fehr, E.; Schmidt, K. M., A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 3, 817-868 (1999) · Zbl 0944.91022 · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 |
| [30] | Qin, Z.; Yang, J., Analysis of a revenue-sharing contract in supply chain management, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 11, 1, 17-29 (2008) · doi:10.1080/13675560701380354 |
| [31] | Bai, S.-Z.; Ni, J., Research on buy-back contract with sales effort cost sharing, Proceedings of the 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, IEEE |
| [32] | Karagözoğlu, E.; Keskin, K., Time-varying fairness concerns, delay, and disagreement in bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 147, 115-128 (2018) |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
