×

Automated and distributed statistical analysis of economic agent-based models. (English) Zbl 1514.62332

Summary: We propose a novel approach to the statistical analysis of stochastic simulation models and, especially, agent-based models (ABMs). Our main goal is to provide fully automated, model-independent and tool-supported techniques and algorithms to inspect simulations and perform counterfactual analysis. Our approach: (i) is easy-to-use by the modeller, (ii) improves reproducibility of results, (iii) optimizes running time given the modeller’s machine, (iv) automatically chooses the number of required simulations and simulation steps to reach user-specified statistical confidence, and (v) automates a variety of statistical tests. In particular, our techniques are designed to distinguish the transient dynamics of the model from its steady-state behaviour (if any), estimate properties in both “phases”, and provide indications on the (non-)ergodic nature of the simulated processes – which, in turn, allows one to gauge the reliability of a steady-state analysis. Estimates are equipped with statistical guarantees, allowing for robust comparisons across computational experiments. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we apply it to two models from the literature: a large-scale macro-financial ABM and a small scale prediction market model. Compared to prior analyses of these models, we obtain new insights and we are able to identify and fix some erroneous conclusions.

MSC:

62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
62E10 Characterization and structure theory of statistical distributions
62J15 Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing
62-08 Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics

References:

[1] Agha, G.; Palmskog, K., A survey of statistical model checking, ACM Trans. Model. Comp. Simul., 28, 1, 6:1-6:39 (2018) · Zbl 1542.68091
[2] Alexopoulos, C.; Goldsman, D., To batch or not to batch?, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 14, 1, 76-114 (2004) · Zbl 1390.65018
[3] Alexopoulos, C.; Seila, A. F., Implementing the batch means method in simulation experiments, Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Winter Simulation, 214-221 (1996), IEEE Computer Society: IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA
[4] An, G.; Wilensky, U., From artificial life to in silico medicine, (Komosinski, M.; Adamatzky, A., Artificial Life Models in Software (2009), Springer London: Springer London London), 183-214
[5] Austin, S. R.; Dialsingh, I.; Altman, N., Multiple hypothesis testing: a review, J Indian Soc Agric Stat, 68, 2, 303-314 (2014)
[6] Barde, S., Direct comparison of agent-based models of herding in financial markets, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 73, 329-353 (2016) · Zbl 1401.91456
[7] ter Beek, M. H.; Legay, A.; Lafuente, A. L.; Vandin, A., A framework for quantitative modeling and analysis of highly (re) configurable systems, IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 46, 3, 321-345 (2020)
[8] ter Beek, M. H.; Legay, A.; Lluch-Lafuente, A.; Vandin, A., Quantitative analysis of probabilistic models of software product lines with statistical model checking, Proceedings 6th Workshop on Formal Methods and Analysis in SPL Engineering, FMSPLE@ETAPS 2015, London, UK, 11 April 2015, 56-70 (2015)
[9] ter Beek, M. H.; Legay, A.; Lluch-Lafuente, A.; Vandin, A., Quantitative security risk modeling and analysis with RisQFLan, Comput. Secur., 109, 102381 (2021)
[10] Belzner, L.; De Nicola, R.; Vandin, A.; Wirsing, M., Reasoning (on) service component ensembles in rewriting logic, Specification, Algebra, and Software, 188-211 (2014), Springer
[11] Belzner, L.; Hennicker, R.; Wirsing, M., Onplan: A framework for simulation-based online planning, Formal Aspects of Component Software, 1-30 (2016), Springer
[12] Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y., Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological), 57, 1, 289-300 (1995) · Zbl 0809.62014
[13] Benjamini, Y.; Liu, W., A step-down multiple hypotheses testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence, J Stat Plan Inference, 82, 1-2, 163-170 (1999) · Zbl 1063.62558
[14] Benjamini, Y.; Yekutieli, D., The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency, Ann Stat, 1165-1188 (2001) · Zbl 1041.62061
[15] Beygelzimer, A.; Langford, J.; Pennock, D., Learning performance of prediction markets with kelly bettors, arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.6655 (2012)
[16] Billingsley, P., Probability and measure (1995), John Wiley & Sons · Zbl 0822.60002
[17] Bortolussi, L.; Milios, D.; Sanguinetti, G., Machine learning methods in statistical model checking and system design - tutorial, (Bartocci, E.; Majumdar, R., Runtime Verification - 6th International Conference, RV 2015 Vienna, Austria, September 22-25, 2015. Proceedings (2015), Springer), 323-341
[18] Bottazzi, G.; Giachini, D., Wealth and price distribution by diffusive approximation in a repeated prediction market, Physica A, 471, 473-479 (2017) · Zbl 1400.91189
[19] Bottazzi, G.; Giachini, D., Betting, selection, and luck: a long-run analysis of repeated betting markets, Entropy, 21, 6, 585 (2019)
[20] Bottazzi, G.; Giachini, D., Far from the madding crowd: collective wisdom in prediction markets, Quantitative Finance, 19, 9, 1461-1471 (2019) · Zbl 1420.91541
[21] Brown, D. G.; Page, S.; Riolo, R.; Zellner, M.; Rand, W., Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, 2, 153-174 (2005)
[22] Caiani, A.; Godin, A.; Caverzasi, E.; Gallegati, M.; Kinsella, S.; Stiglitz, J. E., Agent based-stock flow consistent macroeconomics: towards a benchmark model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 69, 375-408 (2016) · Zbl 1401.91330
[23] Caiani, A.; Russo, A.; Gallegati, M., Does inequality hamper innovation and growth? an ab-sfc analysis, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29, 1, 177-228 (2019)
[24] Carley, K. M.; Fridsma, D. B.; Casman, E.; Yahja, A.; Altman, N.; Chen, L.-C.; Kaminsky, B.; Nave, D., Biowar: scalable agent-based model of bioattacks, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 36, 2, 252-265 (2006)
[25] Carrella, E., No free lunch when estimating simulation parameters, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24, 2, 7 (2021)
[26] Chow, S.-C.; Shao, J.; Wang, H., A note on sample size calculation for mean comparisons based on noncentral t-statistics, J Biopharm Stat, 12, 4, 441-456 (2002)
[27] Ciancia, V.; Latella, D.; Massink, M.; Paškauskas, R.; Vandin, A., A tool-chain for statistical spatio-temporal model checking of bike sharing systems, Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods. Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, LNCS, Vol. 9952, 657-673 (2016)
[28] Cincotti, S.; Raberto, M.; Teglio, A., Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator eurace, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 4 (2010)
[29] Cohen, J., A power primer, Psychol Bull, 112, 1, 155 (1992)
[30] Conway, R. W., Some tactical problems in digital simulation, Manage Sci, 10, 1, 47-61 (1963)
[31] Corradini, F.; Fornari, F.; Polini, A.; Re, B.; Tiezzi, F.; Vandin, A., A formal approach for the analysis of BPMN collaboration models, J. Syst. Softw., 180, 111007 (2021)
[32] Dahlke, J., Bogner, K., Mueller, M., Berger, T., Pyka, A., Ebersberger, B., 2020. Is the juice worth the squeeze? machine learning (ML) in and for agent-based modelling (ABM). 2003.11985.
[33] Dawid, H.; Harting, P.; van der Hoog, S.; Neugart, M., Macroeconomics with heterogeneous agent models: fostering transparency, reproducibility and replication, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29, 1, 467-538 (2019)
[34] Delli Gatti, D.; Di Guilmi, C.; Gaffeo, E.; Giulioni, G.; Gallegati, M.; Palestrini, A., A new approach to business fluctuations: heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility, Journal of Economic behavior & organization, 56, 4, 489-512 (2005)
[35] Delli Gatti, D.; Fagiolo, G.; Gallegati, M.; Richiardi, M.; Russo, A., Agent-based Models in Economics: A Toolkit (2018), Cambridge University Press
[36] Delli Gatti, D.; Grazzini, J., Rising to the challenge: bayesian estimation and forecasting techniques for macroeconomic agent based models, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 875-902 (2020)
[37] https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/dyncon/v52y2015icp166-189.html · Zbl 1402.91438
[38] Dosi, G.; Fagiolo, G.; Roventini, A., Schumpeter meeting keynes: a policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34, 9, 1748-1767 (2010) · Zbl 1231.91324
[39] Dosi, G.; Roventini, A., More is different... and complex! the case for agent-based macroeconomics, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29, 1, 1-37 (2019)
[40] Dosi, G.; Roventini, A.; Russo, E., Endogenous growth and global divergence in a multi-country agent-based model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 101, 101-129 (2019) · Zbl 1411.91394
[41] Effken, J. A.; Carley, K. M.; Lee, J.-S.; Brewer, B. B.; Verran, J. A., Simulating nursing unit performance with orgahead: strengths and challenges, Computers, informatics, nursing: CIN, 30, 11, 620 (2012)
[42] Fagiolo, G.; Giachini, D.; Roventini, A., Innovation, finance, and economic growth: an agent-based approach, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 15, 3, 703-736 (2020)
[43] Fagiolo, G.; Guerini, M.; Lamperti, F.; Moneta, A.; Roventini, A., Validation of agent-based models in economics and finance, Computer Simulation Validation, 763-787 (2019), Springer
[44] Fagiolo, G.; Roventini, A., Macroeconomic policy in dsge and agent-based models, Revue de l’OFCE, 124, 67-116 (2012)
[45] Fagiolo, G.; Roventini, A., Macroeconomic policy in DSGE and agent-based models redux: new developments and challenges ahead, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20, 1 (2017)
[46] Feller, W., 1957. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. · Zbl 0077.12201
[47] Franke, R.; Westerhoff, F., Structural stochastic volatility in asset pricing dynamics: estimation and model contest, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36, 8, 1193-1211 (2012) · Zbl 1345.91009
[48] Friguet, C.; Kloareg, M.; Causeur, D., A factor model approach to multiple testing under dependence, J Am Stat Assoc, 104, 488, 1406-1415 (2009) · Zbl 1205.62071
[49] https://www.jasss.org/8/3/2.html
[50] Galpin, V.; Georgoulas, A.; Loreti, M.; Vandin, A., Statistical analysis of CARMA models: an advanced tutorial, (Johansson, B.; Jain, S., 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden, December 9-12, 2018 (2018), IEEE), 395-409
[51] 936-936
[52] Gilmore, S.; Reijsbergen, D.; Vandin, A., Transient and steady-state statistical analysis for discrete event simulators, Integrated Formal Methods - 13th International Conference, IFM 2017, Turin, Italy, September 20-22, 2017, Proceedings, 145-160 (2017)
[53] Gilmore, S.; Tribastone, M.; Vandin, A., An analysis pathway for the quantitative evaluation of public transport systems, Integrated Formal Methods, 71-86 (2014), Springer
[54] Godley, W.; Lavoie, M., Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth (2006), Springer
[55] Gomes, M. I.; Haan, L. D., Approximation by penultimate extreme value distributions, Extremes (Boston), 2, 1, 71-85 (1999) · Zbl 0947.60019
[56] Gray, R. M., Probability, random processes, and ergodic properties, Vol. 1 (2009), Springer · Zbl 1191.60007
[57] Grazzini, J., Analysis of the emergent properties: stationarity and ergodicity, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 15, 2, 7 (2012)
[58] Grazzini, J.; Richiardi, M., Estimation of ergodic agent-based models by simulated minimum distance, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 51, 148-165 (2015) · Zbl 1402.91528
[59] Grazzini, J.; Richiardi, M. G.; Tsionas, M., Bayesian estimation of agent-based models, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 77, 26-47 (2017) · Zbl 1401.91459
[60] Grimm, V.; Railsback, S. F., Individual-based Modeling and Ecology (2013), Princeton university press · Zbl 1085.92043
[61] Guerini, M.; Moneta, A., A method for agent-based models validation, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 82, 125-141 (2017) · Zbl 1401.91504
[62] Ilachinski, A., Irreducible Semi-Autonomous Adaptive Combat (ISAAC): An Artificial-Life Approach to Land Warfare, Technical Report (1997), DTIC Document
[63] Kelton, W. D.; Law, A. M., An analytical evaluation of alternative strategies in steady-state simulation, Oper. Res., 32, 1, 169-184 (1984) · Zbl 0532.65100
[64] Kets, W.; Pennock, D. M.; Sethi, R.; Shah, N., Betting strategies, market selection, and the wisdom of crowds, Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014)
[65] Kukacka, J.; Kristoufek, L., Do complexfinancial models really lead to complex dynamics? agent-based models and multifractality, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 113, 103855 (2020) · Zbl 1514.91183
[66] Kwiatkowski, D.; Phillips, P. C.; Schmidt, P.; Shin, Y., Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?, J Econom, 54, 1, 159-178 (1992) · Zbl 0871.62100
[67] Lada, E. K.; Mokashi, A. C.; Wilson, J. R., Ard: An automated replication-deletion method for simulation analysis, 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), 802-813 (2013), IEEE
[68] Lamperti, F., Empirical validation of simulated models through the gsl-div: an illustrative application, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 13, 1, 143-171 (2018)
[69] Lamperti, F., An information theoretic criterion for empirical validation of simulation models, Econometrics and Statistics, 5, 83-106 (2018)
[70] Lamperti, F.; Bosetti, V.; Roventini, A.; Tavoni, M., The public costs of climate-induced financial instability, Nat Clim Chang, 9, 11, 829-833 (2019)
[71] Lamperti, F.; Dosi, G.; Napoletano, M.; Roventini, A.; Sapio, A., Faraway, so close: coupled climate and economic dynamics in an agent-based integrated assessment model, Ecol. Econ., 150, 315-339 (2018)
[72] Lamperti, F.; Dosi, G.; Napoletano, M.; Roventini, A.; Sapio, A., Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 153, 119806 (2020)
[73] Lamperti, F.; Roventini, A.; Sani, A., Agent-based model calibration using machine learning surrogates, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 90, 366-389 (2018) · Zbl 1401.91461
[74] Law, A. M.; Carson, J. S., A sequential procedure for determining the length of a steady-state simulation, Oper Res, 27, 5, 1011-1025 (1979) · Zbl 0423.65008
[75] http://www.averill-law.com/simulation-book/. 5th edition
[76] L’Ecuyer, P., 2016. SSJ: Stochastic simulation in Java, software library. http://simul.iro.umontreal.ca/ssj/.
[77] L’Ecuyer, P.; Meliani, L.; Vaucher, J., SSJ: a framework for stochastic simulation in Java, (Yücesan, E.; Chen, C.-H.; Snowdon, J. L.; Charnes, J. M., Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference (2002), IEEE Press), 234-242
[78] Lee, J. S.; Filatova, T.; Ligmann-Zielinska, A.; Hassani-Mahmooei, B.; Stonedahl, F.; Lorscheid, I.; Voinov, A.; Polhill, G.; Sun, Z.; Parker, D. C., The complexities of agent-based modeling output analysis, The journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 18, 4 (2015)
[79] Legay, A.; Lukina, A.; Traonouez, L.; Yang, J.; Smolka, S. A.; Grosu, R., Statistical Model Checking, (Steffen, B.; Woeginger, G. J., Computing and Software Science: State of the Art and Perspectives. Computing and Software Science: State of the Art and Perspectives, LNCS, Vol. 10000 (2019), Springer), 478-504 · Zbl 1482.68142
[80] Legay, A.; Sedwards, S.; Traonouez, L., Rare events for statistical model checking an overview, (Larsen, K. G.; Potapov, I.; Srba, J., Reachability Problems - 10th International Workshop, RP 2016, Aalborg, Denmark, September 19-21, 2016, Proceedings (2016), Springer), 23-35 · Zbl 1478.68168
[81] Lehr, R., Sixteen s-squared over d-squared: a relation for crude sample size estimates, Stat Med, 11, 8, 1099-1102 (1992)
[82] Lux, T.; Zwinkels, R. C., Empirical validation of agent-based models, Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 4, 437-488 (2018), Elsevier
[83] Macy, M. W.; Willer, R., From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling, Annu Rev Sociol, 143-166 (2002)
[84] Malerba, F.; Nelson, R.; Orsenigo, L.; Winter, S., ’History-friendly’models of industry evolution: the computer industry, Industrial and corporate change, 8, 1, 3-40 (1999)
[85] Mandes, A.; Winker, P., Complexity and model comparison in agent based modeling of financial markets, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 12, 3, 469-506 (2017)
[86] Mann, H. B.; Whitney, D. R., On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 1, 50-60 (1947) · Zbl 0041.26103
[87] von Neumann, J., Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance, Ann. Math. Statist., 12, 4, 367-395 (1941) · Zbl 0060.29911
[88] Pianini, D.; Sebastio, S.; Vandin, A., Distributed statistical analysis of complex systems modeled through a chemical metaphor, International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation, HPCS 2014, Bologna, Italy, 21-25 July, 2014, 416-423 (2014)
[89] Poledna, S., Miess, M. G., Hommes, C. H., 2020. Economic forecasting with an agent-based model. Available at SSRN 3484768.
[90] Popoyan, L.; Napoletano, M.; Roventini, A., Winter is possibly not coming: mitigating financial instability in an agent-based model with interbank market, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 103937 (2020) · Zbl 1517.91263
[91] Richiardi, M. G.; Leombruni, R.; Saam, N. J.; Sonnessa, M., A common protocol for agent-based social simulation, Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 9 (2006)
[92] Richiardi, M. G.; Richardson, R. E., Jas-mine: a new platform for microsimulation and agent-based modelling, International Journal of Microsimulation, 10, 1, 106-134 (2017)
[93] Saltelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Chan, K.-S., A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics, 41, 1, 39-56 (1999)
[94] Sarkar, S. K., Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures, The Annals of Statistics, 30, 1, 239-257 (2002) · Zbl 1101.62349
[95] Sarkar, S. K.; Chang, C.-K., The simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics, J Am Stat Assoc, 92, 440, 1601-1608 (1997) · Zbl 0912.62079
[96] Satterthwaite, F. E., An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components, Biometrics bulletin, 2, 6, 110-114 (1946)
[97] Sebastio, S.; Vandin, A., MultiVeStA: statistical model checking for discrete event simulators, 7th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, ValueTools ’13, Torino, Italy, December 10-12, 2013, 310-315 (2013)
[98] Secchi, D.; Seri, R., Controlling for false negatives in agent-based models: a review of power analysis in organizational research, Comput Math Organ Theory, 23, 1, 94-121 (2017)
[99] Sen, K.; Viswanathan, M.; Agha, G., Statistical model checking of black-box probabilistic systems, CAV 2004, 202-215 (2004), Springer · Zbl 1103.68639
[100] 1-1
[101] Seri, R.; Martinoli, M.; Secchi, D.; Centorrino, S., Model calibration and validation via confidence sets, Econometrics and Statistics, 20, 62-86 (2021)
[102] Seri, R.; Secchi, D., How many times should one run a computational simulation?, Simulating Social Complexity, 229-251 (2017), Springer
[103] Steiger, N. M.; Lada, E. K.; Wilson, J. R.; Joines, J. A.; Alexopoulos, C.; Goldsman, D., Asap3: a batch means procedure for steady-state simulation analysis, ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 15, 1, 39-73 (2005) · Zbl 1478.62244
[104] Steiger, N. M.; Wilson, J. R., Convergence properties of the batch means method for simulation output analysis, INFORMS J Comput, 13, 4, 277-293 (2001)
[105] Stuart, A.; Ord, J. K., Kendalls Advanced Theory of statistics, volume 1: Distribution Theory (1994) · Zbl 0880.62012
[106] Sun, W.; Tony Cai, T., Large-scale multiple testing under dependence, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 71, 2, 393-424 (2009) · Zbl 1248.62005
[107] Tafazzoli, A.; Wilson, J. R.; Lada, E. K.; Steiger, N. M., Performance of skart: a skewness-and autoregression-adjusted batch means procedure for simulation analysis, INFORMS J Comput, 23, 2, 297-314 (2011)
[108] Tesfatsion, L.; Judd, K. L., Handbook of computational economics: agent-based computational economics (2006), Elsevier · Zbl 1143.91300
[109] Thiele, J. C.; Kurth, W.; Grimm, V., RNETLOGO: An r package for running and exploring individual-based models implemented in NETLOGO, Methods Ecol. Evol., 3, 3, 480-483 (2012)
[110] Valente, M., Laboratory for simulation development: Lsd, Technical Report (2008), LEM Working Paper Series
[111] van der Hoog, S., Surrogate modelling in (and of) agent-based models: aprospectus, Computational Economics, 53, 3, 1245-1263 (2019)
[112] Vandin, A.; ter Beek, M. H.; Legay, A.; Lluch-Lafuente, A., QFLan: A tool for the quantitative analysis of highly reconfigurable systems, (Havelund, K.; Peleska, J.; Roscoe, B.; de Vink, E. P., Formal Methods - 22nd International Symposium, FM 2018, Held as Part of the Federated Logic Conference, FloC 2018, Oxford, UK, July 15-17, 2018, Proceedings (2018), Springer), 329-337
[113] http://www.jstor.org/stable/2235872 · JFM 66.0645.01
[114] Welch, B. L., The generalization of student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika, 34, 1/2, 28-35 (1947) · Zbl 0029.40802
[115] Welch, P. D., The statistical analysis of simulation results, The computer performance modeling handbook, 22, 268-328 (1983)
[116] Whitt, W., The efficiency of one long run versus independent replications in steady-state simulation, Manage Sci, 37, 6, 645-666 (1991) · Zbl 0746.65105
[117] Wilensky, U., 1999. NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
[118] Windrum, P.; Fagiolo, G.; Moneta, A., Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10, 2, 8 (2007)
[119] Winker, P.; Gilli, M.; Jeleskovic, V., An objective function for simulation based inference on exchange rate data, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2, 2, 125-145 (2007)
[120] Younes, H. L., Probabilistic verification for ǣblack-boxǥ systems, CAV 2015, 253-265 (2005), Springer · Zbl 1081.68641
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.