Improved moving least square-based multiple dimension decomposition (MDD) technique for structural reliability analysis. (English) Zbl 07342023
Summary: This paper presents the state-of-the-art on different moving least square (MLS)-based dimension decomposition schemes for reliability analysis and demonstrates a modified version for high fidelity applications. The aim is to improve the performance of MLS-based dimension decomposition in terms of accuracy, number of function evaluations and computational time for large-dimensional problems. With this in view, multiple finite difference high dimension model representation (HDMR) scheme is developed. This anchored decomposition is implemented starting from an initial reference point and progressively evolving in successive iterations. Most probable point (MPP) of failure is identified in every iteration and is used as the reference point for the next decomposition until it converges. Hermite polynomials in MLS framework are used between the support points for efficient interpolation. The support points are generated sequentially using multiple sparse grids based on the Clenshaw-Curtis scheme. Once the global response surface is constructed using the support points generated in each iteration, importance sampling is employed for reliability analysis. Six different benchmark problems are solved to show its performance vis-à-vis other methods. Finally, reliability-based design of a composite plate is demonstrated, clearly showing the advantage and superiority of the proposed improvements in MLS-based multiple dimension decomposition (MDD).
Keywords:
reliability analysis; polynomial dimension decomposition; moving least square; high-dimensional model representation; sequential sparse gridReferences:
| [1] | Adhikari, S., Chowdhury, R. and Friswell, M. I. [2011] “ High dimensional model representation method for fuzzy structural dynamics,” J. Sound Vib.330, 1516-1529. |
| [2] | Alibrandi, U. and Falsone, G. [2015] “ Optimal design of dampers in seismic excited structures by the expected value of the stochastic dissipated power,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.41, 129-138. |
| [3] | Aliş, Ö. F. and Rabitz, H. [2001] “ Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations,” J. Math. Chem.29, 127-142. · Zbl 1051.93502 |
| [4] | Balu, A. S. and Rao, B. N. [2012] “ Multicut-high dimensional model representation for structural reliability bounds estimation under mixed uncertainties,” Comput-Aided Civ. Inf.27, 419-438. |
| [5] | Baran, M. and Bieniasz, L. K. [2015] “ Experiments with an adaptive multicut-HDMR map generation for slowly varying continuous multivariate functions,” Appl. Math. Comput.258, 206-219. · Zbl 1338.41022 |
| [6] | Benson, J., Ziehn, T., Dixon, N. S. and Tomlin, A. S. [2008] “ Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model-Part II: Application and physical insight using sensitivity analysis,” Atmos. Environ.42, 1874-1891. |
| [7] | Box, G. E. P. and Wilson, K. B. [1951] “ On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions,” J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met.13, 1-45. · Zbl 0043.34402 |
| [8] | Bressolette, P., Fogli, M. and Chauvière, C. [2012] “ A stochastic collocation method for large classes of mechanical problems with uncertain parameters,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.25, 255-270. |
| [9] | Breitung, K. [2015] “ 40 years FORM: Some new aspects?” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.42, 71-77. |
| [10] | Bucher, C. and Bourgund, U. [1990] “ A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems,” Struct. Saf.7, 57-66. |
| [11] | Cai, X., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Yang, P. and Shao, X. [2016] “ An enhanced RBF-HDMR integrated with an adaptive sampling method for approximating high dimensional problems in engineering design,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.53, 1209-1229. |
| [12] | Cai, X., Qiu, H., Gao, L. and Shao, X. [2017] “ Metamodeling for high dimensional design problems by multi-fidelity simulations,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.56, 151-166. |
| [13] | Chakraborty, S. and Chowdhury, R. [2016] “ Assessment of polynomial correlated function expansion for high-fidelity structural reliability analysis,” Struct. Saf.59, 9-19. |
| [14] | Chakraborty, S. and Chowdhury, R. [2017a] “ Moment independent sensitivity analysis: H-PCFE-based approach,” J. Comput. Civil Eng.31, 06016001. |
| [15] | Chakraborty, S. and Chowdhury, R. [2017b] “ Hybrid framework for the estimation of rare failure event probability,” J. Eng. Mech.143, 04017010. |
| [16] | Chakraborty, S. and Majumder, D. [2018] “ Hybrid reliability analysis framework for reliability analysis of tunnels,” J. Comput. Civil Eng.32, 04018018. |
| [17] | Cheng, Y., Liang, D., Wang, W., Gong, S. and Xue, M. [2010] “ An efficient approach of aerosol thermodynamic equilibrium predictions by the HDMR method,” Atmos. Environ.44, 1321-1330. |
| [18] | Cho, H., Venturi, D. and Karniadakis, G. E. [2016] “ Numerical methods for high-dimensional probability density function equations,” J. Comput. Phys.305, 817-837. · Zbl 1349.65046 |
| [19] | Choi, S. K., Grandhi, R. V. and Canfield, R. A. [2004] “ Structural reliability under non-Gaussian stochastic behavior,” Comput. Struct.82, 1113-1121. |
| [20] | Choi, S. K., Grandhi, R. V. and Canfield, R. A. (eds.) [2007] Reliability-Based Structural Design, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, London, UK. · Zbl 1114.93001 |
| [21] | Chowdhury, R. and Adhikari, S. [2010] “ High dimensional model representation for stochastic finite element analysis,” Appl. Math. Model.34, 3917-3932. · Zbl 1201.65009 |
| [22] | Chowdhury, R. and Adhikari, S. [2012] “ Fuzzy parametric uncertainty analysis of linear dynamical systems: A surrogate modeling approach,” Mech. Syst. Signal. Pr.32, 5-17. |
| [23] | Chowdhury, R. and Rao, B. [2009a] “ Hybrid high dimensional model representation for reliability analysis,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.198, 753-765. · Zbl 1229.74123 |
| [24] | Chowdhury, R. and Rao, B. [2009b] “ Assessment of high dimensional model representation techniques for reliability analysis,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.24, 100-115. |
| [25] | Chowdhury, R. and Rao, B. N. [2010] “ Probabilistic stability assessment of slopes using high dimensional model representation,” Comput. Geotech.37, 876-884. |
| [26] | Chowdhury, R. and Rao, B. [2011] “ Multicut high dimensional model representation for reliability analysis,” Struct. Eng. Mech.38, 651-674. |
| [27] | Chowdhury, R., Rao, B. N. and Prasad, A. M. [2009a] “ High dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis,” Commun. Numer. Meth. Eng.25, 301-337. · Zbl 1169.74040 |
| [28] | Chowdhury, R., Rao, B. N. and Prasad, A. M. [2009b] “ Stochastic sensitivity analysis using HDMR and score function,” Sadhana34, 967-986. · Zbl 1426.62296 |
| [29] | Clenshaw, C. W. and Curtis, A. R. [1960] “ A method for numerical integration on an automatic computer,” Numer. Math.2, 197-205. · Zbl 0093.14006 |
| [30] | Coelho, R. F., Lebon, J. and Bouillard, P. [2011] “ Hierarchical stochastic metamodels based on moving least squares and polynomial chaos expansion,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.43, 707-729. · Zbl 1274.74267 |
| [31] | Dey, S., Mukhopadhyay, T. and Adhikari, S. [2015] “ Stochastic free vibration analysis of angle-ply composite plates — A RS-HDMR approach,” Compos. Struct.122, 526-536. |
| [32] | Dey, S., Mukhopadhyay, T. and Adhikari, S. [2017] “ Metamodel based high-fidelity stochastic analysis of composite laminates: A concise review with critical comparative assessment,” Compos. Struct.171, 227-250. |
| [33] | Fan, W., Wei, J., Ang, A. H. S. and Li, Z. [2016] “ Adaptive estimation of statistical moments of the responses of random systems,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.43, 50-67. |
| [34] | Fang, G., Lu, Z. and Cheng, L. [2015] “ A new methodology based on covariance and HDMR for global sensitivity analysis,” Appl. Math. Model.39, 5399-5414. · Zbl 1443.62007 |
| [35] | Faravelli, L. [1989] “ Response-surface approach for reliability analysis,” J. Eng. Mech.115, 2763-2781. |
| [36] | Foo, J. and Karniadakis, G. E. [2010] “ Multi-element probabilistic collocation method in high dimensions,” J. Comput. Phys.229, 1536-1557. · Zbl 1181.65014 |
| [37] | Forrester, A. I. J. and Keane, A. J. [2009] “ Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci.45, 50-79. |
| [38] | Franke, R. [1979] A Critical Comparison of Some Methods for Interpolation of Scattered Data, Report No. NPS53-79-003, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey CA, USA. |
| [39] | Fu, K., Liang, D., Wang, W., Cheng, Y. and Gong, S. [2012] “ Multi-component atmospheric aerosols prediction by a multi-functional MC-HDMR approach,” Atmos. Res.113, 43-56. |
| [40] | Gavin, H. P. and Yau, S. C. [2008] “ High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis,” Struct. Saf.30, 162-179. |
| [41] | Gavin, H. P. and Zaicenco, A. [2007] “ Performance and reliability of semi-active equipment isolation,” J. Sound Vib.306, 74-90. |
| [42] | Gerstner, T. and Griebel, M. [2010] “ Sparse grids,” in Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, Cont, R. (ed.) John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 1235-1240. |
| [43] | Ghanem, R. G. and Spanos, P. D. [1991] Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, 1st edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. · Zbl 0722.73080 |
| [44] | Guan, X. and Melchers, R. [2001] “ Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates,” Struct. Saf.23, 429-444. |
| [45] | Hu, C. and Youn, B. D. [2011] “ Adaptive-sparse polynomial chaos expansion for reliability analysis and design of complex engineering systems,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.43, 419-442. · Zbl 1274.74271 |
| [46] | Hu, C., Youn, B. D. and Yoon, H. [2013] “ An adaptive dimension decomposition and reselection method for reliability analysis,” Struct. Multidiscip. Opt.47, 423-440. · Zbl 1274.62672 |
| [47] | Isukapalli, S. S. [1999] Uncertainty Analysis of Transport-Transformation Models, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. |
| [48] | Jia, G. and Taflanidis, A. A. [2013] “ Kriging metamodeling for approximation of high-dimensional wave and surge responses in real-time storm/hurricane risk assessment,” Comput. Method. Appl. M.261-262, 24-38. · Zbl 1286.86018 |
| [49] | Kaymaz, I. and McMahon, C. A. [2005] “ A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.20, 11-17. |
| [50] | Kiureghian, A. D. and Dakessian, T. [1998] “ Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability,” Struct. Saf.20, 37-49. |
| [51] | Klimke, A. and Wohlmuth, B. [2005] “ Computing expensive multivariate functions of fuzzy numbers using sparse grids,” Fuzzy Set Syst.154, 432-453. · Zbl 1075.65067 |
| [52] | Lee, I., Choi, K. K., Du, L. and Gorsich, D. [2008] “ Inverse analysis method using MPP-based dimension reduction for reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear and multi-dimensional systems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.198, 14-27. · Zbl 1194.74250 |
| [53] | Li, E. and Wang, H. [2016] “ An alternative adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm assisted by expected improvement criterion and cut-HDMR expansion and its application in time-based sheet forming design,” Adv. Eng. Softw.97, 96-107. |
| [54] | Li, E., Wang, H. and Li, G. [2012] “ High dimensional model representation (HDMR) coupled intelligent sampling strategy for nonlinear problems,” Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1947-1955. |
| [55] | Li, G. and Rabitz, H. [2017] “ Relationship between sensitivity indices defined by variance- and covariance-based methods,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.167, 136-157. |
| [56] | Li, G., Wang, S. W. and Rabitz, H. [2002] “ Practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions,” J. Phys. Chem. A106, 8721-8733. |
| [57] | Li, G., Schoendorf, J., Ho, T. S. and Rabitz, H. [2004] “ Multicut-HDMR with an application to an ionospheric model,” J. Comput. Chem.25, 1149-1156. |
| [58] | Li, J., Wang, H. and Kim, N. H. [2012] “ Doubly weighted moving least squares and its application to structural reliability analysis,” Struct. Multidiscip. Opt.46, 69-82. |
| [59] | Liu, P. L. and Kiureghian, A. D. [1991] “ Optimization algorithms for structural reliability,” Struct. Saf.9, 161-177. |
| [60] | Liu, Y., Hussaini, M. Y. and Ökten, G. [2016] “ Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.152, 281-295. |
| [61] | Liu, H., Hervas, J. R., Ong, Y. S., Cai, J. and Wang, Y. [2018] “ An adaptive RBF-HDMR modeling approach under limited computational budget,” Struct. Multidiscip. Opt.57, 1233-1250. |
| [62] | Lophaven, S. N., Nielsen, H. B. and Søndergaard, J. [2002] “DACE: A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox,” Version 2.0, Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling (IMM), Technical University of Denmark. |
| [63] | Luo, X., Lu, Z. and Xu, X. [2014] “ Reproducing kernel technique for high dimensional model representations (HDMR),” Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 3099-3108. · Zbl 1360.46064 |
| [64] | Luyi, L., Zhenzhou, L., Jun, F. and Bintuan, W. [2012] “ Moment-independent importance measure of basic variable and its state dependent parameter solution,” Struct. Saf.38, 40-47. |
| [65] | Ma, X. and Zabaras, N. [2010] “ An adaptive high-dimensional stochastic model representation technique for the solution of stochastic partial differential equations,” J. Comput. Phys.229, 3884-3915. · Zbl 1189.65019 |
| [66] | Ma, X. and Zabaras, N. [2011] “ A stochastic mixed finite element heterogeneous multiscale method for flow in porous media,” J. Comput. Phys.230, 4696-4722. · Zbl 1416.76119 |
| [67] | Maitre, O. L. and Knio, O. M. [2010] Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification, 1st edn., Springer, Netherlands. · Zbl 1193.76003 |
| [68] | Melchers, R. [1989] “ Importance sampling in structural systems,” Struct. Saf.6, 3-10. |
| [69] | Most, T. and Bucher, C. [2005] “ A moving least squares weighting function for the element-free Galerkin method which almost fulfills essential boundary conditions,” Struct. Eng. Mech.21, 315-332. |
| [70] | Mukherjee, D., Rao, B. N. and Prasad, A. M. [2011] “ Global sensitivity analysis of unreinforced masonry structure using high dimensional model representation,” Eng. Struct.33, 1316-1325. |
| [71] | Mukherjee, D., Rao, B. N. and Prasad, A. M. [2012] “ Cut-HDMR-based fully equivalent operational model for analysis of unreinforced masonry structures,” Sadhana37, 609-628. |
| [72] | Mukhopadhyay, T., Dey, T. K., Chowdhury, R., Chakrabarti, A. and Adhikari, S. [2015] “ Optimum design of FRP bridge deck: An efficient RS-HDMR based approach,” Struct. Multidiscip. Opt.52, 459-477. |
| [73] | Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C. and Anderson-Cook, C. M. [2009] Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiment. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. · Zbl 1269.62066 |
| [74] | Naveen, B. O. and Balu, A. S. [2018] “ HDMR-based model update in structural damage identification,” Int. J. Comput. Methods, 1840004, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876218400042. · Zbl 07074131 |
| [75] | Nelsen, R. B. [2006] An Introduction to Copulas (Springer Series in Statistics), 2nd edn. Springer, New York, USA. · Zbl 1152.62030 |
| [76] | Okan, A. and Demiralp, M. [2017] “ A self-consistent high dimensional modeling based decomposition approach for univariate linear integral operators: Tridiagonal Kernel Enhanced Multivariance Products Representation (TKEMPR),” J. Comput. Appl. Math.326, 99-115. · Zbl 1370.65080 |
| [77] | Penmetsa, R. C. and Grandhi, R. V. [2002] “ Efficient estimation of structural reliability for problems with uncertain intervals,” Comput. Struct.80, 1103-1112. |
| [78] | Queipo, N. V., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R. and Tucker, P. K. [2005] “ Surrogate-based analysis and optimization,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci.41, 1-28. |
| [79] | Rabitz, H. and Aliş, Ö. F. [1999] “ General foundations of high-dimensional model representations,” J. Math. Chem.25, 197-233. · Zbl 0957.93004 |
| [80] | Rabitz, H., Aliş, Ö. F., Shorter, J. and Shim, K. [1999] “ Efficient input-output model representations,” Comput. Phys. Commun.117, 11-20. · Zbl 1015.68219 |
| [81] | Rahman, S. [2009] “ Stochastic sensitivity analysis by dimensional decomposition and score functions,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.24, 278-287. |
| [82] | Rahman, S. [2011] “ Decomposition methods for structural reliability analysis revisited,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.26, 357-363. |
| [83] | Rahman, S. and Xu, H. [2004] “ A univariate dimension reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.19, 393-408. |
| [84] | Rahman, S. and Xu, H. [2005] “ Decomposition methods for structural reliability analysis,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.20, 239-250. |
| [85] | Rahman, S. and Wei, D. [2006] “ A univariate approximation at most probable point for higher-order reliability analysis,” Int. J. Solids Struct.43, 2820-2839. · Zbl 1120.74791 |
| [86] | Rajashekhar, M. R. and Ellingwood, B. R. [1993] “ A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis,” Struct. Saf.12, 205-220. |
| [87] | Rao, B. N. and Chowdhury, R. [2008] “ Probabilistic analysis using high dimensional model representation and fast Fourier transform,” Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech.9, 342-357. · Zbl 1253.74006 |
| [88] | Rao, B. N. and Chowdhury, R. [2009] “ Enhanced high-dimensional model representation for reliability analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.77, 719-750. · Zbl 1156.74371 |
| [89] | Rao, B. N., Chowdhury, R. and Prasad, A. M. [2008] “ High dimensional model representation for piece-wise continuous function approximation,” Commun. Numer. Meth. Eng.24, 1587-1609. · Zbl 1155.65014 |
| [90] | Rao, B. N., Chowdhury, R., Prasad, A. M., Singh, R. K. and Kushwaha, H. S. [2009] “ Probabilistic characterization of AHWR inner containment using high dimensional model representation,” Nucl. Eng. Des.239, 1030-1041. |
| [91] | Rao, B. N., Chowdhury, R., Prasad, A. M., Singh, R. K. and Kushwaha, H. S. [2010] “ Reliability analysis of \(500\) MWe PHWR inner containment using high-dimensional model representation,” Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip.87, 230-238. |
| [92] | Rao, B. N. and Rahman, S. [2000] “ An efficient meshless method for fracture analysis of cracks,” Comput. Mech.26, 398-408. · Zbl 0986.74078 |
| [93] | Rathi, A. K. and Chakraborty, A. [2018] “ Dimension adaptive finite difference decomposition using multiple sparse grids for stochastic computation,” Struct. Saf.75, 119-132. |
| [94] | Rathi, A. K., Sharma PV, S. and Chakraborty, A. [2019] “ Sequential stochastic response surface method using moving least squares based sparse grid scheme for efficient reliability analysis,” Int. J. Comput. Methods16(5), 1840017. · Zbl 07074142 |
| [95] | Reddy, J. N. [2004] Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates and Shells: Theory and Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. · Zbl 1075.74001 |
| [96] | Sasikumar, P., Suresh, R. and Gupta, S. [2014] “ Analysis of CFRP laminated plates with spatially varying non-Gaussian inhomogeneities using SFEM,” Compos. Struct.112, 308-326. |
| [97] | Shan, S. and Wang, G. G. [2010] “ Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions,” Struct. Multidiscipc. Opt.41, 219-241. · Zbl 1274.74291 |
| [98] | Sobol’, I. M. [2001] “ Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates,” Math. Comput. Simul.55, 271-280. · Zbl 1005.65004 |
| [99] | Sobol’, I. M. [2003] “ Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.79, 187-193. |
| [100] | Sudret, B. [2008] “ Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.93, 964-979. |
| [101] | Tunga, M. A. [2011] “ An approximation method to model multivariate interpolation problems: Indexing HDMR,” Math. Comput. Model.53, 1970-1982. · Zbl 1219.65018 |
| [102] | Tunga, M. A. and Demiralp, M. [2005] “ A factorized high dimensional model representation on the nodes of a finite hyperprismatic regular grid,” Appl. Math. Comput.164, 865-883. · Zbl 1070.65009 |
| [103] | Tunga, M. A. and Demiralp, M. [2006] “ Hybrid high dimensional model representation (HHDMR) on the partitioned data,” J. Comput. Appl. Math.185, 107-132. · Zbl 1077.65010 |
| [104] | Ulaganathan, S., Couckuyt, T., Dhaene, T., Degroote, J. and Laermans, E. [2016] “ High dimensional Kriging metamodeling utilising gradient information,” Appl. Math. Model.40, 5256-5270. · Zbl 1465.62060 |
| [105] | Vessia, G., Kozubal, J. and Puła, W. [2017] “ High dimensional model representation for reliability analyses of complex rock-soil slope stability,” Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng.17, 954-963. |
| [106] | Walz, N. P., Burkhardt, M., Hanss, M. and Eberhard, P. [2015] “ Sensitivity computation for uncertain dynamical systems using high-dimensional model representation and hierarchical grids,” Proc. IUTAM13, 127-137. |
| [107] | Wang, G. G. and Shan, S. [2007] “ Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization,” J. Mech. Des.129, 370-380. |
| [108] | Wang, H., Tang, L. and Li, G. Y. [2011] “ Adaptive MLS-HDMR metamodeling techniques for high dimensional problems,” Expert Syst. Appl.38, 14117-14126. |
| [109] | Wei, D. L., Cui, Z. S. and Chen, J. [2008] “ Uncertainty quantification using polynomial chaos expansion with points of monomial cubature rules,” Comput. Struct.86, 2102-2108. |
| [110] | Wei, D. and Rahman, S. [2007] “ Structural reliability analysis by univariate decomposition and numerical integration,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.22, 27-38. |
| [111] | Wei, D. and Rahman, S. [2010] “ A multi-point univariate decomposition method for structural reliability analysis,” Int. J. Pres. Ves. Pip.87, 220-229. |
| [112] | Xiong, F., Chen, W., Xiong, Y. and Yang, S. [2011] “ Weighted stochastic response surface method considering sample weights,” Struct. Multidiscip. Opt.43, 837-849. |
| [113] | Xiu, D. and Karniadakis, G. E. [2003] “ Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos,” J. Comput. Phys.187, 137-167. · Zbl 1047.76111 |
| [114] | Xu, H. and Rahman, S. [2004] “ A generalized dimension-reduction method for multidimensional integration in stochastic mechanics,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.61, 1992-2019. · Zbl 1075.74707 |
| [115] | Yadav, V. and Rahman, S. [2014a] “ Adaptive-sparse polynomial dimensional decomposition methods for high-dimensional stochastic computing,” Comput. Method. Appl. M.274, 56-83. · Zbl 1296.62115 |
| [116] | Yadav, V. and Rahman, S. [2014b] “ A hybrid polynomial dimensional decomposition for uncertainty quantification of high-dimensional complex systems,” Probabilist. Eng. Mech.38, 22-34. |
| [117] | Ying, L. [2012] “ Application of stochastic response surface method in the structural reliability,” Proc. Eng.28, 661-664. |
| [118] | Youn, B. D., Xi, Z. and Wang, P. [2008] “ Eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method for sensitivity-free probability analysis,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.37, 13-28. · Zbl 1273.74574 |
| [119] | Zhang, Y. and Kiureghian, A. D. [1995] “ Two improved algorithms for reliability analysis,” in Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems: Proc. Sixth IFIP WG \(7.5\) Working Conf. Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems 1994, Springer, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 297-304. |
| [120] | Zhang, X. and Pandey, M. D. [2013] “ Structural reliability analysis based on the concepts of entropy, fractional moment and dimensional reduction method,” Struct. Saf.43, 28-40. |
| [121] | Zhang, X. and Pandey, M. D. [2014] “ An effective approximation for variance-based global sensitivity analysis,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.121, 164-174. |
| [122] | Ziehn, T., Hughes, K. J., Griffiths, J. F., Porter, R. and Tomlin, A. S. [2009] “ A global sensitivity study of cyclohexane oxidation under low temperature fuel-rich conditions using HDMR methods,” Combust. Theor. Model.13, 589-605. |
| [123] | Ziehn, T. and Tomlin, A. S. [2008a] “ Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model-Part I: The development of high dimensional model representations,” Atmos. Environ.42, 1857-1873. |
| [124] | Ziehn, T. and Tomlin, A. S. [2008b] “ A global sensitivity study of sulfur chemistry in a premixed methane flame model using HDMR,” Int. J. Chem. Kinet.40, 742-753. |
| [125] | Ziehn, T. and Tomlin, A. S. [2009] “ GUI-HDMR — A software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models,” Environ. Model. Softw.24, 775-785. |
| [126] | Ziehn, T. and Tomlin, A. S. [2017] “ Chapter 15 — Efficient tools for global sensitivity analysis based on high-dimensional model representation, in Sensitivity Analysis in Earth Observation Modeling, Petropoulos, G. P. and Srivastava, P. K. (eds.), Elsevier, pp. 297-318. |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
