×

Supply chain coordination with uncertainty in two-echelon yields. (English) Zbl 1262.90017

Summary: We study the coordination models in the supply chain where there are uncertain two-echelon yields and random demand. We analyzed three contracts of revenue sharing (RS), overproduction risk sharing (OS), and combination of RS and OS (RO), and contrasted them with uncoordinated model. We studied the optimal order decision for downstream manufacturer and the optimal production decision for upstream manufacturer. Numerical examples were presented to illustrate the results. The study showed that the RS contract and OS sharing contract both have their advantages and disadvantages and the RO contract could benefit the whole supply chain best. We found out that the OS contract gives the upstream manufacturer incentive to produce more so as to maximize the profit value, but the upstream manufacturer may receive less as the price of overproduced part increases. We also found out that under most scenarios, the supply chain benefits from the yields and demand risks reduction and generates a higher profit. But sometimes in the OS contract the downstream manufacturer profit can increase as yields randomness increases. And, in the uncoordinated case and OS contract, the upstream manufacturer profit can increase as demand randomness increases.

MSC:

90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
90B30 Production models
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00489.x · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00489.x
[2] DOI: 10.1002/nav.10113 · Zbl 1055.90005 · doi:10.1002/nav.10113
[3] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0215 · Zbl 1232.90173 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0215
[4] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.936 · Zbl 1231.90013 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.7.936
[5] DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199408)41:5<609::AID-NAV3220410503>3.0.CO;2-7 · Zbl 0809.90038 · doi:10.1002/1520-6750(199408)41:5<609::AID-NAV3220410503>3.0.CO;2-7
[6] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.036 · Zbl 1109.90004 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.09.036
[7] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.06.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.06.003
[8] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.021 · Zbl 1188.90030 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.021
[9] DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(92)90011-U · doi:10.1016/0925-5273(92)90011-U
[10] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.004 · Zbl 1168.90508 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.004
[11] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.019 · Zbl 1159.90310 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.02.019
[12] DOI: 10.1287/opre.47.2.277 · Zbl 0979.90011 · doi:10.1287/opre.47.2.277
[13] Inderfurth K., Central European Journal of Operations Research 12 pp 117– (2004)
[14] DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2.3.239 · doi:10.1287/mksc.2.3.239
[15] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.018 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.018
[16] DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.07.006 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2008.07.006
[17] Kouvelis P., IIE Transactions 34 pp 717– (2002)
[18] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0154 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0154
[19] Leng M., INFOR 43 pp 187– (2005)
[20] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.10.019 · Zbl 1176.90172 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.10.019
[21] Moses M., IIE Transactions 32 pp 245– (2000)
[22] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0211 · Zbl 1232.90079 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0211
[23] DOI: 10.1287/mksc.16.1.81 · doi:10.1287/mksc.16.1.81
[24] DOI: 10.1007/s00291-005-0025-0 · Zbl 1170.90315 · doi:10.1007/s00291-005-0025-0
[25] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1220.9786 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1220.9786
[26] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(96)00098-7 · Zbl 0929.90004 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(96)00098-7
[27] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515 · Zbl 1232.90200 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515
[28] DOI: 10.1016/0272-6963(81)90007-3 · doi:10.1016/0272-6963(81)90007-3
[29] Weng Z. K., IIE Transactions 29 pp 681– (1997)
[30] DOI: 10.1023/A:1007619423631 · doi:10.1023/A:1007619423631
[31] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.011 · Zbl 1188.90021 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.011
[32] DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00207-9 · doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00207-9
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.