×

Variables reduction in data envelopment analysis. (English) Zbl 1302.90128

Summary: In real applications of data envelopment analysis (DEA), there are a number of pitfalls that could have a major influence on the efficiency. Some of these pitfalls are avoidable and the others remain problematic. One of the most important pitfalls that the researchers confront is the closeness of the number of operational units and the number of inputs and outputs. In performance measurement using DEA, the closeness of these two numbers could yield a large number of efficient units. In this article, some inputs or outputs will be aggregated and the number of inputs and outputs are reduced iteratively. Numerical examples show that in comparison to the single DEA method, our approach has the fewest efficient units. This means that our approach has a superior ability to discriminate the performance of the DMUs.

MSC:

90C08 Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.)
91B06 Decision theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601400 · Zbl 1139.90372 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601400
[2] Amirteimoori, A and Emrouznejad., A.Optimal input/output reduction in production process, Decis. Support Syst. 52 (2012), pp. 742–747 · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.020
[3] DOI: 10.1080/02331930902878333 · Zbl 1203.90080 · doi:10.1080/02331930902878333
[4] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261 · Zbl 0800.90096 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
[5] DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 · Zbl 0416.90080 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[6] Cooper WW, An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses (2006)
[7] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1 · Zbl 0980.90038 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
[8] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00243-6 · Zbl 1011.90528 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00243-6
[9] DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2007.09.010 · Zbl 1179.90316 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2007.09.010
[10] DOI: 10.1023/B:PROD.0000034748.22820.33 · doi:10.1023/B:PROD.0000034748.22820.33
[11] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.045 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.045
[12] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1 · Zbl 1073.90520 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1
[13] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00321-4 · Zbl 0938.91018 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00321-4
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.