×

Theoretical analysis on the finite-support approximation for the mixing-phase FIR systems. (English) Zbl 1169.94309

Summary: The inverse system approximation using the finite impulse responses (FIR) and the corresponding model-order determination are essential to a broad area of science and technology utilizing signal processing. To the best of our knowledge, there exists no explicit formulation of the exact \(L_{2}\) approximation error for the truncated inverse filters. The approach to determine the minimum inverse model-order subject to the maximum allowable \(L_{2}\) approximation error is also in demand. In this paper, we present two \(L_{2}\) approximation error measures and the two corresponding optimal finite-support approximates. Also, we derive the explicit \(L_{2}\) approximation error functions with respect to roots, multiplicities and model orders for these two kinds of approximates. Then, we propose a new algorithm to determine the minimum total model order of the appropriate truncated inverse filter to achieve a specified \(L_{2}\) approximation error. Our newly derived \(L_{2}\) approximation error evaluation method can be employed for signal processing, telecommunication, control systems involving the inverse filtering in the future. Besides, our novel model-order determination algorithm can be utilized for efficient dynamic memory allocation in a wide variety of applications since such a minimum total model order is proportional to the memory usage for any inverse filter implementation.

MSC:

94A12 Signal theory (characterization, reconstruction, filtering, etc.)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Mitra, S. K.: Digital signal processing, (2005)
[2] Daboczi, T.: Uncertainty of signal reconstruction in the case of jittery and noisy measurements, IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 47, 1062-1066 (October 1998)
[3] Rosa, M. O.; Pereira, J. C.; Grellet, M.: Adaptive estimation of residue signal for voice pathology diagnosis, IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 47, 96-104 (January 2000)
[4] Sikora, T.: Optimal Wiener interpolation filters for multiresolution coding of images, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 7, 443-447 (April 1997)
[5] Eldar, Y. C.: Robust deconvolution of deterministic and random signals, IEEE transactions on information theory 51, 2921-2929 (August 2005) · Zbl 1290.94017
[6] Govil, J.: Enhanced residual echo cancellation using estimation of delay and fast LMS/Newton algorithm based on autoregressive model, , 1356 (March 2006)
[7] Baykut, S.; Akgul, T.: Analysis of 1/f characteristics of male/female voiced speech residual, , 216-219 (April 2004)
[8] Park, S. J.; Lee, C.; Youn, D. H.: A residual echo cancellation scheme for hands-free telephony, IEEE signal processing letters 9, No. 12, 397-399 (December 2002)
[9] Tugnait, J. K.: Improved parameter estimation with noisy data for linear models using higher order statistics and inverse filter criteria, IEEE signal processing letters 2, No. 4, 63-65 (April 1995)
[10] Gray, A. J.; Markel, J.: A spectral-flatness measure for studying the autocorrelation method of linear prediction of speech analysis, IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing 22, No. 3, 207-217 (June 1974)
[11] Halpeny, O.; Childers, D.: Composite wavefront decomposition via multidimensional digital filtering of array data, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems 22, No. 6, 552-563 (June 1975)
[12] Chi, C. Y.: A further analysis for the minimum-variance deconvolution filter performance, IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing 35, No. 6, 888-889 (June 1987)
[13] Chi, C. Y.; Wang, D.: An improved inverse filtering method for parametric spectral estimation, IEEE transactions on signal processing 40, No. 7, 1807-1811 (July 1992) · Zbl 0850.62692 · doi:10.1109/78.143450
[14] Palicot, J.; Goupil, A.: Performance analysis of the weighted decision feedback equalizer, Signal processing 88, No. 2, 284-295 (February 2008) · Zbl 1186.94268 · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2007.07.021
[15] Lin, F.; Waag, R. C.: Estimation and compensation of ultrasonic wavefront distortion using a blind system identification method, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics and frequency control 49, No. 6, 739-755 (June 2002)
[16] Miwa, T.; Sato, M.; Niitsuma, H.: Subsurface fracture measurement with polarimetric borehole radar, IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 37, 828-837 (March 1999)
[17] Barlow, J. S.: Computerized clinical electroencephalography in perspective, IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering 26, 377-391 (July 1979)
[18] Ahn, C. B.; Cho, Z. H.: Analysis of the eddy-current induced artifacts and the temporal compensation in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, IEEE transactions on medical imaging 10, 47-52 (March 1991)
[19] Glick, S. J.; Penney, B. C.; King, M. A.; Byrne, C. L.: Noniterative compensation for the distance-dependent detector response and photon attenuation in spect imaging, IEEE transactions on medical imaging 13, 363-374 (June 1994)
[20] Daboczi, T.; Kollar, I.: Multiparameter optimization of inverse filtering algorithms, IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 45, 417-421 (April 1996)
[21] Zhu, Q.; Steinberg, B.: Deaberration of incoherent wavefront distortion: an approach toward inverse filtering, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics and frequency control 44, 575-589 (May 1997)
[22] Li, T. H.: Finite-alphabet information and multivariate blind deconvolution and identification of linear systems, IEEE transactions on information theory 49, 330-337 (January 2003) · Zbl 1063.94011 · doi:10.1109/TIT.2002.806138
[23] Tuncer, T. E.; Aktas, M.: LSE and MSE optimum partition-based FIR – IIR deconvolution filters with best delay, IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing 53, No. 10, 3780-3790 (October 2005) · Zbl 1370.94259
[24] Li, X. L.: A new gradient search interpretation of super-exponential algorithm, IEEE signal processing letters 13, 173-176 (March 2006)
[25] Farhang-Boroujeny, B.: Adaptive filters theory and applications, (1999) · Zbl 1056.93626
[26] Genin, Y.; Kung, S.: A two-variable approach to the model reduction problem with Hankel norm criterion, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems 28, No. 9, 912-924 (1981) · Zbl 0509.41001 · doi:10.1109/TCS.1981.1085067
[27] Yang, C. -D.; Yeh, F. -B.: An efficient algorithm on optimal Hankel-norm approximation for multivariable systems, IEEE transactions on automatic control 37, No. 6, 815-820 (1992) · Zbl 0760.93023 · doi:10.1109/9.256340
[28] L. Song, R.C. de Lamare, A. Hjorungnes, A.G. Burr, Approximate ML Decision Feedback Block Equalizer for Doubly Selective Fading Channels, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, accepted for publication.
[29] Yen, R. Y.; Liu, H. Y.; Li, C. W.; Cheng, W. C.: The adaptive MSINR algorithm to improve error rate for channel equalization, Signal processing 86, No. 8, 1984-1991 (August 2006) · Zbl 1172.94509 · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2005.09.018
[30] Makhoul, J.: Linear prediction: a tutorial review, Proceedings of the IEEE 63, No. 4, 561-580 (April 1975)
[31] Gradshteyn, I. S.; Ryzhik, I. M.; Jeffrey, A.; Zwillinger, D.: Table of integrals, series, and products, (2000) · Zbl 0981.65001
[32] Goldsmith, A.; Chua, S.: Variable-rate variable-power MQAM for fading channels, IEEE transactions on communications 45, No. 10, 1218-1230 (October 1997)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.