×

Constrained school choice: an experimental QRE analysis. (English) Zbl 1527.91119

Summary: The theoretical literature on public school choice proposes centralized mechanisms that assign children to schools on the basis of parents’ preferences and the priorities children have for different schools. The related experimental literature analyzes in detail how various mechanisms fare in terms of welfare and stability of the resulting matchings, yet often provides only aggregate statistics of the individual behavior that leads to these outcomes (i.e., the degree to which subjects tell the truth in the induced simultaneous move game). In this paper, we show that the quantal response equilibrium (QRE) adequately describes individual behavior and the resulting matching in three constrained problems for which the immediate acceptance mechanism and the student-optimal stable mechanism coincide. Specifically, the comparative statics of the logit-QRE with risk-neutral and expected-payoff-maximizing agents capture the directional changes of subject behavior and the prevalence of the different stable matchings when cardinal payoffs (i.e., relative preference intensities) are modified in the experiment.

MSC:

91B68 Matching models

Software:

Z-Tree

References:

[1] Abdulkadiroğlu, A.; Sönmez, T., School choice: a mechanism design approach, Am Econ Rev, 93, 3, 729-747 (2003) · doi:10.1257/000282803322157061
[2] Abdulkadiroğlu, A.; Che, Y-K; Yasuda, Y., Resolving conflictive preferences in school choice: the Boston mechanism reconsidered, Am Econ Rev, 101, 1, 399-410 (2011) · doi:10.1257/aer.101.1.399
[3] Anderson, SP; Goeree, JK; Holt, CA, Minimum-effort coordination games: an analysis of all-pay auctions, J Political Econ, 106, 4, 828-853 (1998) · doi:10.1086/250031
[4] Anderson, SP; Goeree, JK; Holt, CA, Rent seeking with bounded rationality: stochastic potential and logit equilibrium, Games Econ Behav, 34, 2, 177-199 (2001) · Zbl 1013.91006 · doi:10.1006/game.2000.0800
[5] Bó, I.; Hakimov, R., Iterative versus standard deferred acceptance: experimental evidence, Econ J, 130, 626, 356-392 (2020)
[6] Bonkoungou, S.; Nesterov, A., Comparing school choice and college admissions mechanisms by their strategic accessibility, Theor Econ, 16, 3, 881-909 (2021) · Zbl 1474.91112 · doi:10.3982/TE4137
[7] Calsamiglia, C.; Haeringer, G.; Klijn, F., Constrained school choice: an experimental study, Am Econ Rev, 100, 4, 1860-1874 (2010) · doi:10.1257/aer.100.4.1860
[8] Capra, MC; Goeree, JK; Gomez, R.; Holt, CA, Anomalous behavior in a traveler’s dilemma, Am Econ Rev, 89, 3, 678-690 (1999) · doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.678
[9] Chen, Y.; He, Y., Information acquisition and provision in school choice: an experimental study, J Econ Theory, 197 (2021) · Zbl 1471.91339 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2021.105345
[10] Chen, Y.; Kesten, O., Chinese college admissions and school choice reforms: an experimental study, Games Econ Behav, 115, 1, 83-100 (2019) · Zbl 1411.91418 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2019.02.003
[11] Chen, Y.; Sönmez, T., School choice: an experimental study, J Econ Theory, 127, 1, 202-231 (2006) · Zbl 1122.91054 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2004.10.006
[12] Chen, Y.; Su, X.; Zhao, Z., Modeling bounded rationality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium, Manag Sci, 58, 10, 1952-1962 (2012) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1531
[13] Ding, T.; Schotter, A., Learning and mechanism design: an experimental test of school matching mechanisms with intergenerational advice, Econ J, 129, 623, 2779-2804 (2019) · doi:10.1093/ej/uez024
[14] Dreyfuss, B.; Heffetz, O.; Rabin, M., Expectations-based loss aversion may help explain seemingly dominated choices in strategy-proof mechanisms, Am Econ J Microecon, 14, 4, 515-555 (2022) · doi:10.1257/mic.20200259
[15] Dur, U., The modified Boston mechanism, Math Soc Sci, 101, 31-40 (2019) · Zbl 1426.91174 · doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2018.08.004
[16] Dur, U.; Hammond, RG; Kesten, O., Sequential school choice: theory and evidence from the field, J Econ Theory, 198 (2021) · Zbl 1481.91123 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2021.105344
[17] Dur, U.; Hammond, RG; Morrill, T., Identifying the harm of manipulable school-choice mechanisms, Am Econ J Econ Policy, 10, 1, 187-213 (2018) · doi:10.1257/pol.20160132
[18] Dur, U.; Morrill, T., What you don’t know can help you in school assignment, Games Econ Behav, 120, 246-256 (2020) · Zbl 1437.91317 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.10.014
[19] Echenique, F.; Wilson, A.; Yariv, L., Clearinghouse for two-sided matching: an experimental study, Quant Econ, 7, 2, 449-482 (2016) · Zbl 1396.91567 · doi:10.3982/QE496
[20] Featherstone, CR; Niederle, M., Boston versus deferred acceptance in an interim setting: an experimental investigation, Games Econ Behav, 100, 1, 353-375 (2016) · Zbl 1394.91302 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2016.10.005
[21] Fischbacher, U., Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Exp Econ, 10, 2, 171-178 (2007) · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
[22] Gale, D.; Shapley, LS, College admissions and the stability of marriage, Am Math Mon, 69, 1, 9-15 (1962) · Zbl 0109.24403 · doi:10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827
[23] Goeree, JK; Holt, CA, Asymmetric inequality aversion and noisy behavior in alternating-offer bargaining games, Eur Econ Rev, 44, 4, 1079-1089 (2000) · doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00048-3
[24] Goeree, JK; Holt, CA; Palfrey, TR, Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions, J Econ Theory, 104, 1, 257-272 (2002) · Zbl 1015.91028 · doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2914
[25] Goeree, JK; Holt, CA; Palfrey, TR, Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games, Games Econ Behav, 45, 1, 97-113 (2003) · Zbl 1054.91006 · doi:10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00052-6
[26] Goeree, JK; Holt, CA; Palfrey, TR, Regular quantal response equilibrium, Exp Econ, 8, 347-367 (2005) · Zbl 1108.91313 · doi:10.1007/s10683-005-5374-7
[27] Guarnaschelli, S.; McKelvey, RD; Palfrey, TR, An experimental study of jury decision rules, Am Political Sci Rev, 94, 2, 407-423 (2000) · doi:10.2307/2586020
[28] Guillen, P.; Hakimov, R., Not quite the best response: truth-telling, strategy-proof matching, and the manipulation of others, Exp Econ, 20, 3, 670-686 (2017) · doi:10.1007/s10683-016-9505-0
[29] Guillen, P.; Veszteg, R., Strategy-proofness in experimental matching markets, Exp Econ, 24, 2, 650-668 (2021) · doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09665-9
[30] Haeringer, G.; Klijn, F., Constrained school choice, J Econ Theory, 144, 5, 1921-1947 (2009) · Zbl 1195.91034 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2009.05.002
[31] Haile, PA; Hortaçsu, A.; Kosenok, G., On the empirical content of quantal response equilibrium, Am Econ Rev, 98, 1, 180-200 (2008) · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.180
[32] Hakimov, R.; Kübler, D., Experiments on centralized school choice and college admissions: a survey, Exp Econ, 24, 434-488 (2020) · doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09667-7
[33] Kawagoe, T.; Matsubae, T.; Takizawa, H., The skipping-down strategy and stability in school choice problems with affirmative action: theory and experiment, Games Econ Behav, 109, 212-239 (2018) · Zbl 1390.91244 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.12.012
[34] Klijn, F.; Pais, J.; Vorsatz, M., Preference intensities and risk aversion in school choice: a laboratory experiment, Exp Econ, 16, 1-23 (2013) · doi:10.1007/s10683-012-9329-5
[35] Klijn, F.; Pais, J.; Vorsatz, M., Affirmative action through minority reserves: an experimental study on school choice, Econ Lett, 139, 72-75 (2016) · Zbl 1396.91571 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.12.018
[36] Klijn, F.; Pais, J.; Vorsatz, M., Static versus dynamic deferred acceptance in school choice: a laboratory experiment, Games Econ Behav, 113, 147-163 (2019) · Zbl 1419.91530 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.009
[37] Kojima, F.; Ünver, MU, The Boston school-choice mechanism: an axiomatic approach, Econ Theory, 55, 515-544 (2014) · Zbl 1303.91125 · doi:10.1007/s00199-013-0769-8
[38] Li, S., Obviously strategy-proof mechanisms, Am Econ Rev, 107, 11, 3257-3287 (2017) · doi:10.1257/aer.20160425
[39] McKelvey, RD; Palfrey, TR, Quantal response equilibria for normal form games, Games Econ Behav, 10, 1, 6-38 (1995) · Zbl 0832.90126 · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1023
[40] Pais, J.; Pintér, Á., School choice and information: an experimental study on matching mechanisms, Games Econ Behav, 64, 1, 303-328 (2008) · Zbl 1153.91377 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2008.01.008
[41] Pathak, PA; Sönmez, T., School admissions reform in Chicago and England: comparing mechanisms by their vulnerability to manipulation, Am Econ Rev, 103, 1, 80-106 (2013) · doi:10.1257/aer.103.1.80
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.