×

A generalization of Duflo’s conjecture. (English) Zbl 1504.22019

Let \(G\) be a Lie group. Let \(H\) be a Lie subgroup of \(G\) with Lie algebra \(\mathfrak{h}\). Let \(\mathfrak{h}^*\) be the vector space dual of \(\mathfrak{h}\). Let \(\pi\) be a unitary irreducible representation of \(G\). According to the philosophy of the orbit method, there should correspond to \(\pi\) a coadjoint orbit \(\mathcal{O}_{\pi}\) such that the \(H\)-orbits occurring in the image of the associated moment map \(\operatorname{p}:\mathcal{O}_{\pi}\rightarrow\mathfrak{h}^*\) determine the spectrum of the restriction \(\pi\arrowvert_ H\).
For discrete series representations of almost algebraic real Lie groups, a refinement of this principle is the Duflo conjecture, which gives in terms of a properness condition on the moment map, a criterion for \(\pi\arrowvert_H\) to admit a direct sum decomposition into unitary irreducible representations of \(H\), each having a finite multiplicity itself determined by the geometry of the reduced space of \(\mathcal{O}_{\pi}\) relative to p.
When \(G\) is a general linear group over the real or complex numbers and \(H = P\) is its mirabolic subgroup, the Kirillov conjecture, proved in full generality by E. M. Baruch [Ann. Math. (2) 158, No. 1, 207–252 (2003; Zbl 1034.22010)], states that the restriction \(\pi\arrowvert_P\) is irreducible. In this setting, the results of the paper under review are in the spirit of the aforementioned ideas: it is shown that \(\pi\arrowvert_P\) is exactly the unitary irreducible representation which corresponds in Duflo’s orbit method to the unique Zariski open and dense \(P\)-orbit \(\Omega\) in \(\operatorname{p}(\mathcal{O}_{\pi})\). This provides a geometric interpretation of the Kirillov conjecture. It is also shown that the moment map \(\operatorname{p}\) is proper over \(\Omega\) and the reduced space of \(\Omega\) is a singleton set. As \(G\) does not admit discrete series representations, this verifies a generalisation of the Duflo conjecture, supporting in particular the conjectural relationship between multiplicities and the geometry of the reduced space.
The results of the paper depend on a detailed analysis of the geometry of the moment map, which is evaluated using the classification of coadjoint orbits of \(P\) obtained in [G. Liu and J. Yu, “A Geometric Interpretation of Kirillov’s Conjecture”, Preprint, arXiv:1806.06318], where similar results are obtained for tempered representations of \(G\).

MSC:

22E46 Semisimple Lie groups and their representations
17B08 Coadjoint orbits; nilpotent varieties
53D20 Momentum maps; symplectic reduction

Citations:

Zbl 1034.22010

References:

[1] J. Adams, D. Barbasch, D. Vogan:The Langlands Classification and Irreducible Characters for Real Reductive Groups, Progress in Mathematics 104, Birkhäuser, Boston (1992). · Zbl 0756.22004
[2] A. Aizenbud, D. Gourevitch, S. Sahi:Derivatives for smooth representations of GL(n,R)andGL(n,C), Israel J. Math. 206/1 (2015) 1-38. · Zbl 1317.22008
[3] L. Auslander, B. Kostant:Quantization and representations of solvable Lie groups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967) 692-695. · Zbl 0203.03302
[4] E. M. Baruch:A proof of Kirillov’s conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2) 158/1 (2003) 207- 252. · Zbl 1034.22010
[5] J. Bernstein:P-invariant distributions onGL(N)and the classification of unitary representations ofGL(N)(non-Archimedean case), in:Lie Group Representations II, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1041, Springer, Berlin (1984) 50-102. · Zbl 0541.22009
[6] M. Duflo:Théorie de Mackey pour les groupes de Lie algébriques (French), Acta Math. 149/3-4 (1982) 153-213. · Zbl 0529.22011
[7] M. Duflo:On the Plancherel formula for almost algebraic real Lie groups, in:Lie Group Representations III, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1077, Springer, Berlin (1984) 101-165. · Zbl 0546.22014
[8] M. Duflo, J. A. Vargas:Branching laws for square integrable representations, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 86/3 (2010) 49-54. · Zbl 1196.22009
[9] H. Fujiwara:Sur les restrictions des représentations unitaires des groupes de Lie résolubles exponentiels (French), Invent. Math. 104/3 (1991) 647-654. · Zbl 0702.22012
[10] V. Guillemin, S. Sternberg:Geometric quantization and multiplicities of group representations, Invent. Math. 67/3 (1982) 515-538. · Zbl 0503.58018
[11] G. Heckman:Projections of orbits and asymptotic behavior of multiplicities for compact connected Lie groups, Invent. Math. 67/2 (1982) 333-356. · Zbl 0497.22006
[12] A. Kirillov:Lectures on the Orbit Method, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 64, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004). · Zbl 1229.22003
[13] A. W. Knapp, D. Vogan:Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations, Princeton Mathematical Series 45, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995). · Zbl 0863.22011
[14] T. Kobayashi:Discrete decomposability of the restriction ofAq(λ)with respect to reductive subgroups and its applications, Invent. Math. 117 (1994) 181-205. · Zbl 0826.22015
[15] T. Kobayashi:Discrete descomposability of the restriction ofAq(λ)with respect to reductive subgroups. II: Microlocal analysis and asymptotic K-support, Ann. of Math. 2nd Ser. 147/3 (1998) 709-729. · Zbl 0910.22016
[16] T. Kobayashi:Discrete decomposability of the restriction ofAq(λ)with respect to reductive subgroups. III: Restriction of Harish-Chandra modules and associated varieties, Invent. Math. 131 (1998) 229-256. · Zbl 0907.22016
[17] T. Kobayashi:Admissible restrictions of irreducible representations of reductive Lie groups: Symplectic geometry and discrete decomposability, arXiv: 1907.12964 (2019). · Zbl 1481.22011
[18] T. Kobayashi, S. Nasrin:Multiplicity one theorem in the orbit method, in:Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces, S. Gindikin (ed.), Translation Series 2, Volume 210, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003) 161-169. · Zbl 1048.22006
[19] T. Kobayashi, S. Nasrin:Geometry of coadjoint orbits and multiplicity-one branching laws for symmetric pairs, Algebr. Repr. Theory 21/5 (2018) 1023-1036. · Zbl 1404.22035
[20] T. Kobayashi, B. Ørsted:Conformal geometry and branching laws for unitary representations attached to minimal nilpotent orbits, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 326/8 (1998) 925-930. · Zbl 0910.22010
[21] G. Liu:Duflo’s conjecture for the branching problem to the IwasawaAN-subgroup of a semisimple Lie group, Math. Ann. 362/1-2 (2015) 107-120. · Zbl 1320.22004
[22] G. Liu, Y. Oshima, J. Yu:Restriction of irreducible unitary representations of Spin(N,1)to parabolic subgroups, arXiv: 2010.01026 (2020).
[23] G. Liu, J. Yu:A geometric interpretation of Kirillov’s conjecture, arXiv: 1806.06318 (2018).
[24] G. W. Mackey:Induced representations of locally compact groups I, Ann. of Math. 2nd Ser. 55 (1952) 101-139. · Zbl 0046.11601
[25] P.-E. Paradan:Quantization commutes with reduction in the non-compact setting: the case of holomorphic discrete series, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 17/4 (2015) 955-990. · Zbl 1355.53074
[26] P.-E. Paradan:Kirillov’s orbit method: the case of discrete series representations, Duke Math. J. 168/16 (2019) 3103-3134. · Zbl 1431.22014
[27] S. Sahi:On Kirillov’s conjecture for Archimedean fields, Compositio Math. 72/1 (1989) 67-86. · Zbl 0693.22006
[28] S. Sahi:A simple construction of Stein’s complementary series representations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 108/1 (1990) 257-266. · Zbl 0714.22013
[29] S. Sahi, E. M. Stein:Analysis in matrix space and Speh’s representations, Invent. Math. 101/2 (1990) 379-393. · Zbl 0728.22010
[30] D. Vogan:The unitary dual ofGL(n)over an Archimedean field, Invent. Math. 83/3 (1986) 449-505. · Zbl 0598.22008
[31] D. Vogan:Unitary Representations of Reductive Lie Groups, Annals of Mathematics Studies 118, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1987). · Zbl 0626.22011
[32] D. Vogan:Unitary representations of reductive Lie groups and the orbit method. Based on notes prepared by Jorge Vargas, in:New Developments in Lie Theory and their Applications, Progress in Mathematics 105, Birkhäuser, Boston (1992) 87-114. · Zbl 0789.22026
[33] D
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.