×

Pairs of commuting nilpotent operators with one-dimensional intersection of kernels and matrices commuting with a Weyr matrix. (English) Zbl 1459.15013

The authors deal with the problem of classifying pairs \((A, B)\) of commuting nilpotent operators on a vector space. Such a problem has its origin in the paper of I. M. Gel’fand and V. A. Ponomarev [Funkts. Anal. Prilozh. 3, No. 4, 81–82 (1969; Zbl 0204.45301)] where they proved that classifying pairs \((M, N)\) of commuting nilpotent matrices under similarity transformations includes the problem of classifying \(t\)-tuples of matrices with any \(t\) under similarity transformations \[ (A_1, \ldots, A_t) \rightarrow (S^{-1} A_1 S, \ldots, S^{-1} A_t S), \qquad S {\mbox{ is nonsingular}}. \] Using Belitskii’s algorithm, the authors reduce \((M, N)\) by similarity transformations to some simple pair \((W_M, B)\), where \(W_M\) is the Weyr canonical form of \(M\). They also show that uniqueness of the pair \((W_M, B)\) can be proved only if the Jordan canonical form of \(M\) is a direct sum of Jordan blocks of the same size and the field \(\mathbb{F}\) is of zero characteristic. Finally in order to describe the structure of the matrix \(B\), the authors describe the form of all matrices that commute with a Weyr matrix.

MSC:

15A21 Canonical forms, reductions, classification
15A27 Commutativity of matrices
16G60 Representation type (finite, tame, wild, etc.) of associative algebras

Citations:

Zbl 0204.45301

References:

[1] Barot, M., Representations of quivers, (Notes for a Course at the “Advanced School on Representation Theory and Related Topics” (2006), ICTP: ICTP Trieste, Italy), available in
[2] Barot, M., Introduction to the Representation Theory of Algebras (2015), Springer: Springer Cham · Zbl 1330.16001
[3] Belitskiĭ, G. R., Normal forms in a space of matrices, (Marchenko, V. A., Analysis in Infinite-Dimensional Spaces and Operator Theory (1983), Naukova Dumka: Naukova Dumka Kiev), 3-15, (in Russian)
[4] Belitskii, G., Normal forms in matrix spaces, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory, 38, 251-283 (2000) · Zbl 0971.65037
[5] Belitskii, G. R.; Sergeichuk, V. V., Complexity of matrix problems, Linear Algebra Appl., 361, 203-222 (2003) · Zbl 1030.15011
[6] Friedland, S., Simultaneous similarity of matrices, Adv. Math., 50, 189-265 (1983) · Zbl 0532.15009
[7] Gantmacher, F. R., The Theory of Matrices, vol. 1 (2000), AMS Chelsea Publishing
[8] Gelfand, I. M.; Ponomarev, V. A., Remarks on the classification of a pair of commuting linear transformations in a finite dimensional vector space, Funct. Anal. Appl., 3, 325-326 (1969)
[9] Horn, R. A.; Johnson, C. R., Matrix Analysis (2013), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 1267.15001
[10] Krause, H., Representations of quivers via reflection functors (2008), available in
[11] O’Meara, K. C.; Clark, J.; Vinsonhaler, C. I., Advanced Topics in Linear Algebra: Weaving Matrix Problems Through the Weyr Form (2011), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York · Zbl 1235.15013
[12] Sergeichuk, V. V., Canonical matrices for linear matrix problems, Linear Algebra Appl., 317, 53-102 (2000) · Zbl 0967.15007
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.